F118 Accepted in Part

Learning and information from complaints

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Subject to anonymisation, a summary of each upheld complaint relating to patient care, in terms agreed with the complainant, and the trust's response should be published on its website. In any case where the complainant or, if different, the patient, refuses to agree, or for some other reason publication of an upheld, clinically related complaint is not possible, the summary should be shared confidentially with the Commissioner and the Care Quality Commission.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009 require NHS bodies to prepare an annual report on complaints handling, including the number of complaints received and how they were dealt with. These reports must be made available to the public (SI 2009/309, Regulation 18).
- CQC requires registered providers to submit complaints data as part of the Notifications regulations. CQC's Regulation 16 (receiving and acting on complaints) requires providers to have an accessible complaints system, to investigate complaints, and to take action where necessary. CQC assesses complaint handling during inspections (SI 2014/2936, Regulation 16).
- The PHSO's NHS Complaint Standards (July 2022) state that organisations should use complaints data for learning and improvement and should be transparent about complaints outcomes. However, the standards do not specifically require the publication of individual upheld complaint summaries on trust websites as Francis recommended (NHS Complaint Standards, PHSO, July 2022).
- No published evidence has been identified of a national requirement for trusts to publish anonymised summaries of each individual upheld complaint on their websites. Most trusts publish aggregated complaints data in annual reports and quality accounts, but not individual complaint summaries.

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 6 Feb 2026 · NHS organisations Francis recommended learning and information from complaints be systematically shared and acted upon. The NHS complaints procedure was reformed and CQC monitors complaint handling. However, subsequent healthcare scandals (Shrewsbury and Telford, East Kent, Countess of Chester) demonstrated that complaint information was still not being acted upon effectively. The Ockenden Report (2022) found maternity complaints at Shrewsbury were systematically dismissed. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
  • 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 1 Jul 2022 · Legislation - Integrated Care Boards (Health and Care Act 2022) Clinical Commissioning Groups replaced by 42 Integrated Care Boards from 1 July 2022 under Health and Care Act 2022. ICBs have broader responsibilities for population health, bringing together NHS organisations, local authorities and partners. Implements some Francis recommendations on commissioning integration. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Apr 2022 · PHSO - NHS Complaint Standards PHSO developed NHS Complaint Standards framework providing consistent approach to complaint handling across NHS. Piloted 2021-2022, introduced across NHS from 2022. Applies to all NHS organisations and independent healthcare providers delivering NHS-funded care. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
  • 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
  • 28 Oct 2013 · UK Government - Clwyd-Hart Review Ann Clwyd MP and Professor Tricia Hart published review of NHS hospital complaints handling on 28 October 2013. Key recommendations: Chief Executives must sign off complaint responses; Trust Boards must scrutinise complaints; trusts must publish annual complaints reports in plain English. View source → Confirmed Completed

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.