F107

Sharing concerns

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

If the Health Protection Agency or its successor, or the relevant local director of public health or equivalent official, becomes concerned that a provider's management of healthcare associated infections is or may be inadequate to provide sufficient protection of patients or public safety, they should immediately inform all responsible commissioners, including the relevant regional office of the NHS Commissioning Board, the Care Quality Commission and, where relevant, Monitor, of those concerns. Sharing of such information should not be regarded as an action of last resort. It should review its procedures to ensure clarity of responsibility for taking this action.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

DHSC and NHS England stated in September 2024 that the recommendation was implemented on an ongoing basis, reporting that health protection functions had transferred to the UK Health Security Agency and that a statutory Code of Practice on infection prevention was issued in 2022 (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted earlier government progress updates and an April 2013 memorandum of understanding between Public Health England and the Care Quality Commission (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
Public Health England is reviewing its governance framework which underpins its responsibilities (in partnership with local, regional and national partners) for sharing and escalating concerns. As part of this work and as new structures emerge, Public Health England is revisiting and updating its internal operational guidelines, which provide a standardised risk-based approach within the framework, for its regional centres. This work formalises the process whereby Public Health England internally escalates, and informs local and national commissioners and regulators about, any concerns they might have regarding the management of Healthcare Associated Infection-related risks linked with health and adult social care providers (e.g. during outbreaks and incidents of infectious diseases).
A peer support toolkit, previously developed by the Health Protection Agency (whose functions were transferred into Public Health England from 1 April 2013), is also under review. The toolkit clarifies the process whereby expert and peer support might be offered to, or requested by, healthcare providers. It includes recommended timelines, and the format the advice might take, as deemed appropriate for the situation.
Following discussions with the key parties outlined in this recommendation, joint draft proposals are being developed to share expertise across all the key stakeholders in relation to infection, including those that are healthcare associated. These stakeholders include the Care Quality Commission, Monitor, NHS England and the NHS Trust Development Authority. The draft proposals strengthen current practices on information sharing among these organisations and will also establish an agreed set of principles and information flows setting out the lines of communication for sharing information where there are concerns that may require further investigation. The overarching principles and lines of communication were established in July 2013.

Extract from: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

On 1 April 2013 the Health Protection Agency was abolished, and its functions were transferred to the Secretary of State (section 56 and Part 2 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012). Public Health England (PHE) was established as an executive agency of the Department of Health in 2013.

On 1 April 2012 the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) was formally established as an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care. All of PHE’s health protection functions transferred to UKHSA and PHE was abolished.

UKHSA’s regional teams lead UKHSA’s response to all health related incidents within their part of the country. They provide specialist input to local authorities, the local NHS and other partners to prevent and reduce the impact of infectious diseases; environmental, chemical and radiation hazards; and major emergencies. This includes investigating and managing health protection enquiries, cases, incidents and outbreaks, as well as delivering regional disease surveillance and alert systems. See associated standards for healthcare associated infections.

The NHS Standard Contract (SC 21) requires providers to adhere to Code of Practice on the Prevention and Control of Infections and put in place and implement an infection prevention programme in accordance with it .

In 2022 DHSC issued a detailed statutory Code of Practice on infection prevention and control.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 107, PDF page 475-476.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

Public Health England has been undertaking work to review and revise arrangements for the sharing of information and escalation of concerns relating to the management of healthcare associated infections by health and adult social care providers. This includes procedures for internal escalation within Public Health England and escalation to relevant external bodies, such as commissioners and regulators, both locally and nationally. This work is being undertaken within the context of an organisation-wide strategic review, which includes consideration of the management of public health priorities to ensure Public Health England can fulfil its role of leading the public health system and deliver its responsibilities in the most efficient and effective way.

Set in this context, escalation procedures have been updated and will be finally outlined within updated operational guidance for Public Health England Centres, aimed at improving the quality and consistency of the advice and support Public Health England Centres offer to provider organisations in relation to healthcare associated infections. Public Health England’s operational guidance has been re-written to reflect the changes to structures within the health and social care sector in England and to outline the requirements relating to the Antimicrobial Resistance agenda. It is currently being prepared for internal consultation with a view to publication before the end of march 2015. Public Health England’s work to update this operational guidance will be further finessed by the recommendations resulting from its own internal strategic review. This document encompasses the updated escalation algorithm and is scheduled for publication by end of March 2015. Public Health England is also considering how it will integrate proportionate expert support into the escalation process as requested or deemed necessary according to the level of concern.

Additionally, Public Health England is working to integrate this approach into a high-level overview of the escalation steps in relation to sharing concerns about healthcare associated infections aligned to incident levels within Public Health England’s National Incident Response Plan. This work is being undertaken with partners, including the Department of Health, NHS England, the Care Quality Commission, Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority. Public Health England will continue to monitor the agreed ways of working between the organisations and undertake work to strengthen, these informed by any changes or recommendations arising from its strategic review.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to Public Health England, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that Public Health England was formalising the process by which it internally escalated and informed local and national commissioners and regulators about any concerns they might have about management of healthcare associated infections.

Public Health England and the Care Quality Commission’s April 2013 Memorandum of Understanding included provision for Public Health England to notify the Care Quality Commission where it had concerns about relevant incidents ad outbreaks, including in relation to how a service has managed to them.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that Public Health England was undertaking work to review and revise arrangements for the sharing of information and escalation of concerns relating to the management of healthcare associated infections by healthcare providers.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 107, PDF page 441-442.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.