Accountability of providers' directors
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: CQC
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Provision should be made for regulatory intervention to require the removal or suspension from office after due process of a person whom the regulator is satisfied is not or is no longer a fit and proper person, regardless of whether the trust is in significant breach of its authorisation or licence.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- No published evidence has been identified that CQC has exercised its power under Regulation 5 to require the removal of a director. A parliamentary written question (PQ 48409, October 2016) addressed enforcement of the FPPT; the response indicated that CQC does not maintain a record of directors found not fit and proper, as the requirement is for providers to determine fitness (PQ 48409, 12 October 2016).
- The Kark review (February 2019) recommended (Recommendation 5) a power to disbar individuals from board positions for serious misconduct, independent of whether the trust is in breach of its licence or registration conditions. The Secretary of State did not accept this recommendation at the time (Kark review, DHSC, February 2019).
- The government consultation response of July 2025 confirmed that secondary legislation will be brought forward to implement a statutory barring system for senior NHS leaders, to be operated by the Health and Care Professions Council. This would create a mechanism for regulatory removal of individuals found guilty of serious misconduct, independent of the trust's overall regulatory status. Parliamentary debate is anticipated in the second half of 2026 (Leading the NHS: proposals to regulate NHS managers, DHSC, consultation response, July 2025).
Response — verbatim from government
●Department of Health and Social Care
The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
- 30 Sep 2023 · UK Government - Kark Review of FPPT Tom Kark QC reviewed the Fit and Proper Person Test in 2019 and found it essentially "does not ensure directors are fit for the post they hold, and does not stop the unfit from moving around the system." NHS England published updated FPPT Framework effective 30 September 2023 requiring standardised board-level assessments. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
- 27 Nov 2014 · Legislation - Fit and Proper Person Requirement Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Regulation 5: Fit and Proper Person Requirement came into force November 2014. Requires providers to ensure directors meet fitness requirements including good character, qualifications, competence. CQC can require removal of directors. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
- 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.