F13

The nature of standards

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Standards should be divided into: Fundamental standards of minimum safety and quality – in respect of which non-compliance should not be tolerated. Failures leading to death or serious harm should remain offences for which prosecutions can be brought against organisations. There should be a defined set of duties to maintain and operate an effective system to ensure compliance; Enhanced quality standards – such standards could set requirements higher than the fundamental standards but be discretionary matters for commissioning and subject to availability of resources; Developmental standards which set out longer term goals for providers – these would focus on improvements in effectiveness and are more likely to be the focus of commissioners and progressive provider leadership than the regulator. All such standards would require regular review and modification.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended dividing healthcare standards into fundamental, enhanced quality, and developmental tiers. In commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England stated that the Care Quality Commission (CQC) can take civil enforcement action or bring criminal prosecutions against providers breaching fundamental standards, alongside wider requirements set through provider licences and the NHS Oversight Framework (2024) (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found that twelve fundamental standards took effect in April 2015 under 2014 regulations, while enhanced quality standards and developmental statements were incorporated into guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
The Department of Health, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NHS England and the Care Quality Commission are working on a new framework of standards. New regulations setting out fundamental standards of care will come into effect during 2014, and will apply to all providers of health and social care required to register with the Care Quality Commission. Through its Chief Inspectors, the Care Quality Commission is engaging with providers, professionals and the public on what guidance it should publish on complying with these regulations and how they should relate to the Care Quality Commission’s broader assessments of the quality of health and care services.
In Patients First and Foremost13 the Government confirmed that the Care Quality Commission would work with stakeholders to draw up a set of simpler fundamental standards that would make explicit the basic standards, and set a clear bar below which care should never fall. In June 2013, the Care Quality Commission issued A new start – Consultation on changes to the way the Care Quality Commission regulates, inspects and monitors care. This document started the public discussion on what the fundamental standards of care should be. On 17 October 2013, the Care Quality Commission published the responses to the consultation in A new start: Responses to our consultation on changes to the way the Care Quality Commission regulates, inspects and monitors care services, which showed that there is broad agreement with the new approach. The Department will consult shortly on the draft regulations; these will set in legislation the fundamental standards of care as outcomes that providers must meet. The final set of standards is likely to cover areas such as: care and safety of patients and service users; abuse, including neglect; respecting and involving service users; nutrition; consent; governance; cleanliness and safety of premises and equipment; staffing; fitness of directors; and duty of candour.
The Care Quality Commission will issue succinct guidance on meeting the regulations’ requirements, which it will take into account when considering prosecutions. This guidance will sit alongside the broader handbook that the Care Quality Commission will issue on how it decides ratings of providers and services.
The fundamental standards of care will be part of the regulatory system in their own right, alongside the Care Quality Commission’s broader assessments of the overall quality of a provider’s services. This will start initially in the hospital sector, but also alongside new Chief Inspectors of General Practice and Adult Social Care, who will extend and develop the approach for their respective sectors over time. The Care Quality Commission will keep guidance for their sectors under review and will advise Ministers if changes to the regulations are needed.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has an existing programme of production of quality standards that define what high quality care should look like in a defined care or service area. Topics in healthcare are referred by NHS England to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence provides guidance for commissioners to help them to commission for quality improvement within these areas. Enhanced quality standards are set out for commissioners in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards, which in future will also specify developmental standards.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

CQC is the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England. They monitor, inspect and regulate services to ensure health and social care services are safe, effective, compassionate and providing high quality care. Where a registered provider of healthcare services is found to have breached the fundamental standards as set out in the Health and Social Care 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, CQC can bring civil enforcement action or a criminal prosecution. The highest level of civil enforcement action available is to cancel a providers registration.

All organisations are required under the Health Act 2009 to produce Quality Accounts if they deliver services under an NHS Standard Contract.

Guidance published by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership sets out that the legislation governing Quality Accounts requires details of the trust’s clinical audit participation for each of the national audits, enquiries and quality improvement programmes they participate in. They also require information related to improvements responding to clinical audit report recommendations.

In addition to the CQC’s fundamental standards, the NHS Oversight Framework (2024) set NHS England’s approach to oversight of NHS providers and ICBs. This includes oversight metrics to indicate issues.

The NHS provider licence included a condition covering provider governance (FT4) that required organisations to meet specific standards as set by DHSC, Monitor, CQC or NHS England.

The Code of governance for NHS provider trusts (2023) sets out the expectation that the board of directors will establish procedures that manage risk.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 13, PDF page 429-430.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has introduced developmental statements in its quality standards where appropriate. Between June and September 2014 it published NICE quality standards - the process guide a consultation on its updated quality standards process guide which made detailed proposals for how developmental statements would be identified and produced.

The Government has passed legislation that will put in place new fundamental standards as requirements for registration with the Care Quality Commission. These fundamental standards set a minimum level below which care must not fall. Where providers fail to meet these standards the Care Quality Commission will be able to use its enforcement powers to protect patients and service users from the risks of poor care – including prosecuting providers where a failure to meet a fundamental standard results in avoidable harm to a patient or service user, or a significant risk of such harm.

The fundamental standards will come into force for all providers registered with the Care Quality Commission in April 2015. Two new regulations introducing a duty of candour for NHS bodies and a fit and proper person requirement for directors of NHS bodies came in to force in November 2014.The Care Quality Commission published guidance for providers on the duty of candour for NHS bodies and the fit and proper person requirement for directors of NHS bodies regulations to help providers meet the requirements of the regulations.

The Care Quality Commission has also recently published a series of provider handbooks. These will sit alongside the guidance on the regulations and describe the end to end inspection process, including how the Care Quality Commission will judge what good quality care looks like and how the Care Quality Commission will rate providers. The handbooks cover hospitals, specialist mental health services, community health services, adult social care, and GP and out of hours services.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

Fundamental standards were implemented via the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities)) Regulations 2014, regs. 8 to 20A, in force from April 2015. Twelve fundamental standards. Every registered healthcare provider of NHS services required to comply with these requirements.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government considered that enhanced quality standards were already provided by guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence had published a consultation on its updated quality standards process which made detailed proposals for how developmental standards would be identified and produced, and that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence had introduced developmental statements in its quality standards where appropriate.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 13, PDF page 390-391.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.