ACPO Media Contact Recording
Leveson Inquiry · An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · Issued 29 November 2012 · Addressed to: Police, National Police Chiefs Council
Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Mar 2018)
DeliveryNo statement from Police or National Police Chiefs Council found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
It should be mandatory for ACPO rank officers to record all of their contact with the media, and for that record to be available publicly for transparency and audit purposes. This record need be no more than a very brief note to the effect that a conversation has taken place and the subject matter of that conversation. Where the discussion involves a more significant operational or organisational matter, then it may be sensible for a more detailed note to be retained. Finally, in circumstances where policy or organisation matters may be on the agenda for discussion, it is good practice for a press officer also to be present.
Leveson Inquiry, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · 29 Nov 2012 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry recommended that chief police officers publicly record all contact with the media. In a May 2024 written answer, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Home Office, relayed that the recommendation was accepted by the Association of Chief Police Officers, superseded by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), and stated that "All the recommendations have been addressed" (Lord Sharpe of Epsom, May 2024). In Authorised Professional Practice updated in October 2025, the College of Policing stated that chief officers should publicly record all media contact where policing matters are discussed (College of Policing, Oct 2025).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.
About this summary
Report-level response context
Government response
●UK Government · Accepted · 1 Mar 2018
The Metropolitan Police Service, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services and the College of Policing have implemented or are implementing all of the Inquiry’s recommendations in relation to law enforcement. For example, the College of Policing have published a code of ethics and developed national guidance for police officers on how to engage with the press. Reforms in the Policing and Crime Act 2017 also strengthened protections for whistleblowers.
Delivery
No statement on delivery from Police or National Police Chiefs Council has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
What other bodies have found
●College of Policing · 7 Oct 2025
Chief officers should record all their contact with the media where policing matters are discussed. This record should be publicly available. A brief record that the conversation has taken place and of its subject matter is sufficient.
●Home Office · 23 May 2024
The Leveson Inquiry made eight recommendations (68 and 75-81) concerning the press and the police, focused on providing greater transparency and openness. These were accepted by the Government, the College of Policing and the then Association of Chief Police Officers (superseded by the National Police Chiefs’ Council). All the recommendations have been addressed.
Earlier findings (1)
●Home Office · 12 Feb 2013
This recommendation is accepted by the Home Office and ACPO have given a commitment that it will be implemented in due course. In the future, the College of Policing will take forward work on issues relating to ethics, values and standards of integrity within the police.
From: Leveson Inquiry Report Recommendations - Home Office Response
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.