L59

ICO Good Practice Guidelines

Leveson Inquiry · An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · Issued 29 November 2012 · Addressed to: Information Commissioner

Government responseInformation Commissioner: Accepted (Jan 2013)

DeliveryInformation Commissioner says completed (Sep 2014)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

In discharge of its functions and duties to promote good practice in areas of public concern, the Information Commissioner's Office should take immediate steps, in consultation with the industry, to prepare and issue comprehensive good practice guidelines and advice on appropriate principles and standards to be observed by the press in the processing of personal data. This should be prepared and implemented within six months from the date of this Report.

Leveson Inquiry, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · 29 Nov 2012 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked the Information Commissioner's Office to publish data protection guidance for the press. In September 2014, it published guidance for the media explaining data protection obligations, clarifying journalism exemptions, and advising on good practice (Information Commissioner's Office, Sep 2014). It had previously reported in June 2013 that it had consulted on developing guidance for the press and on issuing it as a code of practice (Information Commissioner's Office, Jun 2013). In January 2013, it recognised the need to prepare guidance based on data protection law as it then stood and the importance of consultation with the press and broadcasting industry (Information Commissioner's Office response, Jan 2013).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.

Report-level response context

PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.

Government response

●Information Commissioner · Accepted · 7 Jan 2013

Words of: Information Commissioner's Office, The Information Commissioner's Response to the Leveson Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press, 7 January 2013

We recognise the need for the ICO to prepare this guidance, based on the DPA as it currently stands. We also recognise the importance of consultation with the press and broadcasting industry.

Extract from: The Information Commissioner's Response to the Leveson Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press

Delivery

●Information Commissioner says completed · 4 Sep 2014

In the report of the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press, Lord Justice Leveson recommended that the ICO: “should take immediate steps, in consultation with the industry, to prepare and issue comprehensive good practice guidelines and advice on appropriate principles and standards to be observed by the press in the processing of personal data.” This guide responds to that need. It explains how the DPA applies to journalism. It sets out the basic principles and obligations, advises on good practice, and clarifies how an exemption for journalism works to protect freedom of expression. It also explains what happens when someone complains, and the role and powers of the ICO.

From: Data protection and journalism: a guide for the media

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Information Commissioner · 19 Jun 2013

We have paid close attention to the Inquiry recommendations and published an action plan responding to these. We have set out an engagement strategy to ensure we have a more constructive relationship with media bodies on their compliance with information rights law and have consulted on developing guidance for the press on data protection as recommended by Lord Justice Leveson. We consulted about issuing this guidance in the form of a code of practice.

From: Information Commissioner's Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012/13

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.