Information management Code of Practice
Bichard Inquiry · The Bichard Inquiry Report · Issued 22 June 2004 · Addressed to: Home Office
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Dec 2004)
DeliveryHome Office says completed (May 2006)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
A Code of Practice should be produced covering record creation, review, retention, deletion and information sharing. This should be made under the Police Reform Act 2002 and needs to be clear, concise and practical. It should supersede existing guidance.
Bichard Inquiry, The Bichard Inquiry Report · 22 Jun 2004 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Home Office reported in May 2006 that recommendations 8 to 11, including this recommendation, had been implemented (Home Office, May 2006). The department had previously stated in December 2004 that a draft Code of Practice on Information Management had been introduced for consultation, setting out high-level principles for police information management and sharing to be implemented by June 2005 alongside detailed operational guidance (Home Office response, Dec 2004).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 22 Dec 2004
A draft Code of Practice on Information Management for the police has been introduced for consultation and will be implemented by June 2005. The Code sets out the high-level principles for information management and sharing by the police service, and will be supported by detailed operational guidance.
Response document: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Progress Report
Delivery
●Home Office says completed · 25 May 2006
Recommendations 8–11 implemented.
From: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Third Progress Report
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.