R6 Accepted

PNC data quality inspection

Bichard Inquiry · The Bichard Inquiry Report · Issued 22 June 2004 · Addressed to: HMICFRS, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The quality and timeliness of PNC data input should be routinely inspected as part of the Policing Performance Assessment Framework (PPAF) and the Baseline Assessments, which are being developed by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC).

Bichard Inquiry, The Bichard Inquiry Report · 22 Jun 2004 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

Home Office

The Home Secretary made a statement to Parliament on 22 June 2004, the day the Bichard Inquiry Report was published, accepting all 31 recommendations in full. The government stated it was "in principle, accepting Sir Michael's main recommendations and will act on them immediately." Implementation led to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 and the creation of the Independent Safeguarding Authority (now the Disclosure and Barring Service). By February 2007, 21 of the 31 recommendations had been fully or substantially completed. See Hansard, 22 June 2004.

Home Office · 22 Jun 2004 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Jan 2015 · Home Office HMIC 'Building the Picture' inspection examined police information management practices across 14 forces. Found varying levels of alignment with national framework. HMIC incorporated police data quality into PEEL inspections as successor to PPAF. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.