Review firearms officer Post Incident Procedures delays
Manchester Arena Inquiry · Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 2: Emergency Response · Issued 3 November 2022 · Addressed to: College of Policing
Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Nov 2025)
DeliveryCabinet Office says completed (Feb 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The College of Policing should assess whether delays in the provision of written accounts by some firearms officers involved in the response to the Attack were due to Post-Incident Procedures. If so, those procedures should be reviewed.
Manchester Arena Inquiry, Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 2: Emergency Response · 3 Nov 2022 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In February 2026, the Cabinet Office recorded the recommendation as completed on its monitoring dashboard, stating that the armed policing review relating to post-incident procedures was closed with no update required (Cabinet Office, Feb 2026). The UK government had previously accepted the recommendation in full in November 2025, when the dashboard also logged the review as closed (Cabinet Office response, Nov 2025; Cabinet Office, Nov 2025).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●UK Government · Accepted · 14 Nov 2025
Accepted in full
Response document: Manchester Arena Inquiry recommendations (GOV.UK page linking to the Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard)
Delivery
●Cabinet Office says completed · 27 Feb 2026
Armed Policing APP Review relating to PIP HO & NPCC - CLOSED - NO UPDATE REQUIRED
Earlier statements on delivery (0)
●Cabinet Office · 14 Nov 2025
Armed Policing APP Review relating to PIP HO & NPCC - CLOSED - NO UPDATE REQUIRED
From: Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, original version (data file)
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.