40

Extend medical examiners to stillbirths

Morecambe Bay Investigation · Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · Issued 3 March 2015 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Jul 2015)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say not accepted (Feb 2026)DHSC states no delivery position (May 2024)Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered (Mar 2020)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Given that the systematic review of deaths by medical examiners should be in place, as above, we recommend that this system be extended to stillbirths as well as neonatal deaths, thereby ensuring that appropriate recommendations are made to coroners concerning the occasional need for inquests in individual cases, including deaths following neonatal transfer. Action: the Department of Health.

Morecambe Bay Investigation, Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · 3 Mar 2015 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Investigation recommended extending the medical examiner system to review stillbirths and neonatal deaths. The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, that the recommendation had not been taken forward (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). They explained that while the statutory medical examiner system was introduced in September 2024 for non-coronial deaths, stillbirths cannot be included because stillborn babies are not legally classified as having died (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In June 2026, Baroness Levitt for the Ministry of Justice stated that the government will consider next steps on coronial investigations of stillbirths after an independent investigation into maternity care led by Baroness Amos reports (Baroness Levitt, Jun 2026).

Sources

Baroness Levitt, Jun 2026

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 16 Jul 2015

Words of: Department of Health, Learning not blaming (Cm 9113), government response to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports, July 2015

106. We accept these recommendations in principle. The medical examiners system has been trialled successfully in a number of areas across the country. We will soon be publishing a report from the interim National Medical Examiner setting out the lessons learned from the pilot sites. 107. The Government remain committed to the principle of these reforms. Further progress will be informed by a reconsideration of the operation of the new system in the light of other positive developments on patient safety since 2010 and by a subsequent public consultation exercise on regulations required to introduce a medical examiner system nationally in England. 108. Medical examiners would scrutinise all deaths except for stillbirths (for legal reasons) and any death that requires a coroner investigation. However, the MBRRACE confidential enquiries provide independent scrutiny of all maternal deaths and topics related to stillbirths and neonatal deaths, which is sufficient to learn national lessons for improvement of care.

Response document: Learning not blaming: The government response to the Freedom to Speak Up consultation, the Public Administration Select Committee report 'Investigating Clinical Incidents in the NHS', and the Morecambe Bay Investigation

Site note: This is the Department of Health's response, "Learning not blaming" (Cm 9113, July 2015), to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports. The department has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018, and the rows are filed under that name. Every word is the department's, including where it reports what another body has done or will do.

Site note: The response gives this passage once, for recommendations 39 and 40 together ("We accept these recommendations in principle"), and the same words are recorded on each.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say not accepted · 27 Feb 2026

This recommendation was accepted in principle by the previous Government but has not been taken forward.

As set out in response to recommendation 39, the new statutory medical examiner system was rolled out across England and Wales from 9 September 2024 to provide independent scrutiny of non-coronial deaths, and to give bereaved people a voice. However, as set out in the Government response at the time, there is no provision for the medical examiner system to become involved in the certification for stillborn babies and therefore this recommendation was not accepted. This is because the functions of medical examiners, as set out in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, are limited to scrutinising causes of death. Stillborn babies are not legally classified as having died because Common law does not see this as a death, as they were not born alive.

Section 4 of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc) Act 2019 places a duty on the Secretary of State of Health and Social Care to make arrangements for the preparation of a report on whether, and if so how, the law ought to be changed to enable or require coroners to investigate still-births. The previous Government (DHSC and the Ministry of Justice) jointly consulted on proposals to provide coroners with new powers to investigate term stillbirths in 2019. In 2023, a factual summary of responses to the consultation was published.

There are other mechanisms through which still births are reviewed and investigated.

The Maternity and Newborn Investigations Programme conducts independent investigations of specific perinatal deaths, including term intrapartum stillbirths, and neonatal deaths of all term babies born following labour when the baby died within the first week of life (0-6 days) of any cause. The Programme was originally established as a part of the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB). The work of the HSIB transferred to the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) following the Health and Care Act 2022. As the Act did not make provision for maternity investigations under HSSIB, and to ensure the continuation of independent maternity investigations, the programme transitioned into the CQC in October 2023 and became known as the Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme.

The PMRT supports Trusts to carry out standardised perinatal mortality reviews across NHS maternity and neonatal units in England. The PMRT is used to investigate a wider remit of cases, including all stillbirths where the baby is born from 24+0 weeks gestation showing no signs of life, or if the gestation is not known, where the baby is over 500g.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Not accepted”. Table row: section 23.2 No. 40, PDF page 654-655.

●DHSC states no delivery position · 15 May 2024

Medical examiners were introduced on a non-statutory basis from 2019 to provide independent scrutiny of the causes of all non-coronial deaths, to support the appropriate direction of deaths to the coroner. This includes neonatal death.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024), The Department of Health and Social Care

Site note: DHSC's own comments on progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in February 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). They are not a finding of the Inquiry. Table row: section 20.2 No. 40, PDF page 620.

●Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered · 2 Mar 2020

Medical examiners have been introduced on a non-statutory basis from April 2019 to scrutinise all non-coronial deaths and ensure the right deaths are referred to coroners. This includes neonatal death.

From: Maternity Services: Standards (written question UIN 21205)

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Department of Health and Social Care · 24 Feb 2020

Medical examiners will scrutinise all non-coronial deaths and ensure the right deaths are referred to coroners. This includes neonatal deaths. We remain committed to establishing a statutory system in the National Health Service, that will scrutinise all deaths which do not involve a coroner, as soon as Parliamentary time allows. This will build upon the non-statutory system already being implemented.

There is currently no provision for the medical examiner to become involved in the certification for stillborn babies. This is because the functions of medical examiners, as set out in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, are limited to scrutinising causes of death. Stillborn babies are not legally classified as having died because Common law does not see this as a death, as they were not born alive. Officials have been analysing responses to the consultation that sets out proposals for giving coroners new powers to investigate term stillbirths. The Government plans to publish a response in the spring or early summer.

From: Neonatal Mortality and Perinatal Mortality (written question UIN 548)

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Ministry of Justice · 25 Jun 2026

The independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care led by Baroness Amos set out in its terms of reference that it will look to understand the potential role of coroners in the investigation of late term stillbirths and identify mistakes which would help prevent future deaths. We want to ensure that the Government’s final conclusions on coronial investigation of stillbirths reflect any relevant findings and recommendations when the independent investigation makes. We will carefully consider next steps following the publication of the final report.

From: Coroners: Perinatal Mortality (written question UIN HL868)

Site note: Written answer HL868 of 25 June 2026, given by Baroness Levitt for the Ministry of Justice, to a question on the 37-week threshold for coronial investigation of stillbirths. Neither the question nor the answer names the Morecambe Bay Investigation. It is recorded here because this recommendation asks for medical examiners' review of deaths to extend to stillbirths, with recommendations to coroners. The recommendation is addressed to the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care); this is the Ministry of Justice's answer, not that department's.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 27 Feb 2026

Department of Health response (July 2015):

Accepted in principle.

“The medical examiners system has been trialled successfully in a number of areas across the country …

Medical examiners would scrutinise all deaths except for stillbirths (for legal reasons) and any death that requires a coroner investigation.

However, the MBRRACE confidential enquiries provide independent scrutiny of all maternal deaths and topics related to stillbirths and neonatal deaths, which is sufficient to learn national lessons for improvement of care.” (p. 94)

Hansard – September 2023 “We have already committed to moving medical examiners to a statutory basis and will table secondary legislation on that shortly. It will ensure that deaths not reviewed by a coroner are investigated in all medical settings, in particular extending coverage in primary care, and will enter into force in April.” (col 36-37)

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 23.2 No. 40 (one merged cell for Nos. 39, 40), PDF page 654-655.

●Health and Social Care Committee Expert Panel · 22 Mar 2024

However, the Government is yet to publish its decision about whether to include stillbirths within the remit of medical examiners, following a consultation which closed in 2019.

From: Expert Panel: Evaluation of the Government's progress on meeting patient safety recommendations (Second Special Report of Session 2023-24)

Earlier findings (1)

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

“We have already committed to moving medical examiners to a statutory basis and will table secondary legislation on that shortly. It will ensure that deaths not reviewed by a coroner are investigated in all medical settings, in particular extending coverage in primary care, and will enter into force in April.” (col 36-37)

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 20.2 No. 40, PDF page 620.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.