30

National protocol on duties relating to inquests

Morecambe Bay Investigation · Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · Issued 3 March 2015 · Addressed to: NHS England

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Jul 2015)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say partially delivered (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered (Mar 2020)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

A national protocol should be drawn up setting out the duties of all Trusts and their staff in relation to inquests. This should include, but not be limited to, the avoidance of attempts to 'fend off' inquests, a mandatory requirement not to coach staff or provide 'model answers', the need to avoid collusion between staff on lines to take, and the inappropriateness of relying on coronial processes or expert opinions provided to coroners to substitute for incident investigation. Action: NHS England, the Care Quality Commission.

Morecambe Bay Investigation, Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · 3 Mar 2015 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In commentary published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated that the government has not introduced a national protocol, explaining that existing legislation and professional codes remove the need for one (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). They reported that inquest duties were instead addressed through provider reminders, regulator guidance, and the rollout of medical examiners in September 2024 (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Earlier, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found in May 2024 that it could identify no follow-up to the department's initial commitment to consider an additional protocol (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 16 Jul 2015

Words of: Department of Health, Learning not blaming (Cm 9113), government response to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports, July 2015

67. We accept this recommendation in principle. We will give further thought, with the Ministry of Justice and Chief Coroner's Office, to whether an additional protocol would be helpful in guiding appropriate behaviour in relation to coroner investigations and inquests. In the meantime, we will ask Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority to remind Foundation Trusts and NHS Trusts of the existing legislation and guidance setting out their duties in relation to inquests. 68. Dr Kirkup's assessment of the behaviour of certain staff in relation to the inquest process is particularly concerning. There is existing legislation in relation to how public bodies and professionals should behave with respect to coronial processes, and expectations within existing professional codes. All relevant information must be shared with coroners to ensure that they are able to carry out their statutory duties to investigate relevant deaths, to ascertain who has died, where, when and how: • The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 gives coroners powers to require a person or organisation in England and Wales to provide evidence and to require a witness in England and Wales to give evidence at an inquest. The 2009 Act makes it, "an offence for a person to do anything that is intended to have the effect of (a) distorting or otherwise altering any evidence, document or other things that is given, produced or provided for the purpose of an investigation... (b) preventing any evidence, document or other thing from being given produced or provided for the purposes of such an investigation or to do anything that the person knows or believes is likely to have that effect". This offence is limited to actions where there is "intention" to distort or alter evidence, and is punishable by a fine and / or imprisonment. • The new Nursing and Midwifery Council Code requires nurses and midwives to cooperate with all investigations and audits and to be open and candid with service users about all aspects of care and treatment, including when any mistake or harm has taken place. • The General Medical Council's publication Good Medical Practice and supporting guidance includes clear requirements for medical doctors to cooperate with formal inquiries, including inquests, to be honest and trustworthy when giving evidence, and to make sure any information they give is not false or misleading.

Response document: Learning not blaming: The government response to the Freedom to Speak Up consultation, the Public Administration Select Committee report 'Investigating Clinical Incidents in the NHS', and the Morecambe Bay Investigation

Site note: This is the Department of Health's response, "Learning not blaming" (Cm 9113, July 2015), to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports. The department has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018, and the rows are filed under that name. Every word is the department's, including where it reports what another body has done or will do.

Site note: The recommendation is addressed to NHS England; the passage is the Department of Health's account, not that body's.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say partially delivered · 27 Feb 2026

The Government has not introduced a national protocol.

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and the professional codes of the GMC and the NMC fulfil this recommendation and remove the need for a specific protocol on inquests to be developed.

NHS Improvement (now NHS England) reminded NHS providers of their duties regarding coroner’s inquests in May 2016. CQC has developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Coroner’s Society.

NHS Resolution published guidance for health providers on supporting staff to prepare for an inquest. In 2020, NHS Resolution also produced three films to help prepare staff for giving evidence. Film two sets out the legal and professional obligations required as part of attending an inquest and giving evidence under oath.

From 9 September 2024 all deaths in any health setting that are not investigated by a coroner will be reviewed by NHS medical examiners. The purpose of the medical examiner system includes providing greater safeguards for the public by ensuring independent scrutiny of all non-coronial deaths and ensuring the appropriate direction of deaths to the coroner.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Partially Implemented – Closed”. Table row: section 23.2 No. 30, PDF page 649-650.

●Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered · 2 Mar 2020

NHS Improvement, in 2016, published national compulsory guidance on the duties, and the current legislation relating to coroner inquests that National Health Service trusts, foundation trusts, and individual clinicians must follow with regards to coronial processes.

Healthcare professional regulators, the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the General Medical Council’s guidance requires nurses, midwives and doctors to cooperate with all investigations, formal inquires and inquests.

From: NHS Trusts: Coroners (written question UIN 21208)

Site note: Written answer of 2 March 2020 by Nadine Dorries for the Department of Health and Social Care. The question cites the Morecambe Bay Investigation report and asks what has been done on this recommendation. The recommendation is addressed to NHS England; this is the Department's answer, not theirs.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

Department of Health response (July 2015):

They will give “further thought” to an additional protocol. (p. 81) However, unable to find any follow up to this.

“There is existing legislation in relation to how public bodies and professionals should behave with respect to coronial processes.” (p. 81)

“The new Nursing and Midwifery Council Code requires nurses and midwives to cooperate with all investigations and audits and to be open and candid with service users about all aspects of care and treatment, including when any mistake or harm has taken place.”

“The General Medical Council’s publication Good Medical Practice and supporting guidance includes clear requirements for medical doctors to cooperate with formal inquiries, including inquests” (p. 81)

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 20.2 No. 30, PDF page 612.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.