Home / Inquiries / Azelle Rodney Inquiry / AR-1
AR-2 →
AR-1

Full Review of Operation Tayport

Azelle Rodney Inquiry · The Report of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry · Issued 5 July 2013 · Addressed to: Metropolitan Police Service

Government responseMetropolitan Police Service: Accepted (Jun 2014)Ministry of Justice: No response yet (Jul 2013)

DeliveryNo statement from Metropolitan Police Service found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Thus, I recommend that, as soon as is reasonably practicable, the MPS undertake a full, thorough review of all aspects of Operation Tayport.

Azelle Rodney Inquiry, The Report of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry · 5 Jul 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The recommendation asks the Metropolitan Police Service to thoroughly review Operation Tayport. In June 2014, Assistant Commissioner Rowley stated that he commissioned Commander Neil Basu to review the recommendations (AC Rowley response, Jun 2014). In May 2014, the Azelle Rodney Inquiry reported that the police force asked Deputy Chief Constable Simon Chesterman to review the operation to address the recommendation, and that the commander had completed a further review against chapter 24 of the report and sent it to the Chairman for consideration (Azelle Rodney Inquiry, May 2014). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of June 2014 (AC Rowley response, Jun 2014).

Sources

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 19 Oct 2026.

Government response

●Metropolitan Police Service · Accepted · 3 Jun 2014

Words of: AC Rowley, Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service, covering response in the Metropolitan Police Service review of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry recommendations, to Sir Christopher Holland, 2014

I commissioned Commander Neil Basu – the head of profession for armed policing in the MPS and an experienced Strategic Firearms Commander, to conduct a review of your recommendations as set out by Judy Kemish on the 3rd February 2014

Response document: Metropolitan Police Service review of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry recommendations

Site note: This document is on the Inquiry's own website, which closed in 2015. The link is to the UK Government Web Archive capture of 6 April 2015, the only copy on the public record. The review is a two-column table, so the passage is taken from a table-aware extraction: a line-based one interleaves the columns and scatters the sentence. The table row this passage sits in is keyed to the Inquiry report paragraph that carries the recommendation.

●Ministry of Justice · No response yet · 5 Jul 2013

No formal government response published. The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice made a written statement to the House of Commons on 5 July 2013, the day the report was published. It names no recommendation and states no government position on any.

Read the response →

Delivery

No statement on delivery from Metropolitan Police Service has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Azelle Rodney Inquiry · 2 May 2014

The MPS asked the national lead for armed policing, DCC Simon Chesterman, to conduct a review of Operation Tayport in order to properly address the Chairman's first recommendation. Further, as a result of a request from the Chairman, AC Rowley commissioned Commander Basu to review Operation Tayport against the comments in Chapter 24 of the Report. Commander Basu has made a number of further recommendations alongside those made by Sir Christopher and DCC Chesterman. The review is now complete and has been sent to the Chairman for his consideration.

From: Azelle Rodney Inquiry: Recommendations Update

Site note: This document is on the Inquiry's own website, which closed in 2015. The link is to the UK Government Web Archive capture of 6 April 2015, the only copy on the public record.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.