Proactive DoF Monitoring
RHI Inquiry · The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · Issued 13 March 2020 · Addressed to: Department of Finance
Government responseNorthern Ireland Executive: Accepted (Oct 2021)
DeliveryDepartment of Finance says in progress (Mar 2024)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Particularly where a policy initiative is demand-led, novel, complex and/or likely to be lengthy, consideration should be given to increasing Department of Finance involvement from an early stage and on an ongoing basis, including a more proactive role in monitoring the financial progress of the relevant initiative, rather than merely reactively dealing with periodic requests for additional expenditure or approval.
RHI Inquiry, The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · 13 Mar 2020 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In March 2024, the Department of Finance reported that work remained in progress, explaining that a May 2022 letter allows it to apply variable standard and non-standard approval conditions to tailor post-approval monitoring to a project's risk, complexity, and expenditure scale (Department of Finance, Mar 2024). The Northern Ireland Audit Office subsequently found in October 2024 that the recommendation had been implemented (Northern Ireland Audit Office, Oct 2024).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Northern Ireland Executive · Accepted · 7 Oct 2021
These recommendations can be accepted in full.
It is important to note that public expenditure in NI is governed by the UK Budgeting rules set by HM Treasury. These rules mean that there is limited flexibility available to the Executive in some areas.
Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including the stipulation that resources should be utilised in line with regularity, propriety and value for money considerations. Funding for some specific issues may be provided by HMT on a time-limited basis. In addition the HMT public expenditure rules mean that only very limited funding can be carried forward between financial years. However, this does not override the value for money requirement. Departments have the opportunity to revise annual budget allocations through the in-year process.
Value for Money is already a requirement in the NICS core competency framework.
These recommendations have been addressed in work to date through:
• Departments’ response to the lessons learned following PWC’s Heat Reports;
• the major and fundamental Review of the Expenditure Approval and Business Case Processes, incorporating many of the recommended elements;
• the delivery of an online package of Public Expenditure training for both budget holders and general-service grades;
• the initiation of a review of MPMNI;
• re-establishment of DoF-led Finance Director meetings
• the issue of a formal protocol for engagement with HMT.
Further work is required to:
• give consideration to the role of Casework Committees to ensure that they are rigorous and deliver the necessary scrutiny and independence, in line with the existing role of GatewayTM reviews;
• Implementation of Five Case Model guidance
• Engagement with the Treasury around ‘false economies’
• Consideration by DoF of the introduction of an Approval Panel for the highest cost and most complex proposals
• As part of the Annual Assurance Statement, departments will be asked to confirm:
- that the appropriate approvals process has been followed for all expenditure;
- that Ministers have been made aware of conditions that apply to all expenditure approvals as standard and specifically have been made aware of any non-standard conditions that had been applied to expenditure; and
- that they are content all expenditure activity has adhered to the conditions of its approval.
• Supply shall:
- include a line in non-standard approval letters to say that Ministers should be made aware of the additional conditions; and
- issue a Finance Directors letter to advise this change is coming in and that it would be for departments to determine the most suitable method for advising their Minister of such conditions.
• Progress and finalise the review of MPMNI
• deliver the strategy currently under development for the NICS finance profession;
• Gauge the demand for a further classroom-based training course. As part of that process DoF will engage with Finance Directors on departmental requirements. Should there be demand for such a course DoF will develop in conjunction with CAL.;
• keep the information sharing and knowledge transfer protocols under review, engaging with HMT and departments on their effectiveness and revising where necessary.
• assess position with both HMT and departments and review any breaches for lessons learned as part of its first review.
Response document: Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan: Annex A Summary of Recommendations and Response
Delivery
●Department of Finance says in progress · 14 Mar 2024
The Department of Finance wrote to departments in May 2022 regarding the conditions of DoF approval. This letter stated that, while DoF would continue to routinely apply standard conditions of approval to projects it approved, these conditions, in terms of implementation timeframes and tolerance levels, could vary depending on the nature of the project. Further, the letter stated that DoF may also apply “non-standard” conditions of approval in certain circumstances, to provide further assurance around the proposal. These measures taken together will help to ensure that DoF can tailor the level of monitoring of a project post-approval to the degree of complexity, risk, scale of spend, etc involved.
From: Implementation of the Recommendations of the RHI Inquiry (publication page for three documents)
Earlier statements on delivery (0)
●Department of Finance · 1 Sep 2023
The Department of Finance wrote to departments in May 2022 regarding the conditions of DoF approval. This letter stated that, while DoF would continue to routinely apply standard conditions of approval to projects it approved, these conditions, in terms of implementation timeframes and tolerance levels, could vary depending on the nature of the project.
Further, the letter stated that DoF may also apply “non-standard” conditions of approval in certain circumstances, to provide further assurance around the proposal. These measures taken together will help to ensure that DoF can tailor the level of monitoring of a project post-approval to the degree of complexity, risk, scale of spend, etc involved.
From: Implementation of the Recommendations of the RHI Inquiry (publication page for three documents)
What other bodies have found
●NI Audit Office · 15 Oct 2024
Implemented.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.