BAHA-49 Accepted

Consistent Training Materials

Baha Mousa Inquiry · The Report of the Baha Mousa Inquiry - Volume III · Issued 8 September 2011 · Addressed to: Ministry of Defence

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Training materials across the Services need to be reviewed to ensure that the messages about all aspects of CPErS handling are clear and consistent. The arrangement whereby the PM(A) will act as a coordinator and validator of prisoner handling training should assist in bringing greater consistency.

Baha Mousa Inquiry, The Report of the Baha Mousa Inquiry - Volume III · 8 Sep 2011 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Defence Secretary stated on 8 September 2011 that the government accepted this recommendation and stated that training materials had been reviewed and made consistent across the Services, with the Provost Marshal (Army) acting as coordinator and validator of prisoner handling training (Government Response to the Baha Mousa Inquiry, Ministry of Defence, September 2011).
- Military training materials are internal documents not publicly available for independent verification.

Response — verbatim from government

Ministry of Defence

Accepted. Training materials have been reviewed and made consistent across Services.

Ministry of Defence · 8 Sep 2011 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.