Consistent Sight Deprivation Terminology
Baha Mousa Inquiry · The Report of the Baha Mousa Inquiry - Volume III · Issued 8 September 2011 · Addressed to: Ministry of Defence
Government responseMinistry of Defence: Accepted in part (Sep 2011)
DeliveryMinistry of Defence says completed (Mar 2014)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Theatre level detention instructions and guidance should be reviewed to ensure that references to the means of permissible sight deprivation are consistent.
Baha Mousa Inquiry, The Report of the Baha Mousa Inquiry - Volume III · 8 Sep 2011 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry recommended reviewing detention guidance to ensure consistent references to permissible sight deprivation. In March 2014, Mark Francois, Minister for the Armed Forces, announced that the Ministry of Defence had taken action to consider and address all accepted recommendations (Mr Mark Francois, Mar 2014). Previously, in September 2011, Liam Fox, Secretary of State for Defence, stated to the House of Commons that he was accepting in principle all inquiry recommendations with one reservation (Dr Liam Fox response, Sep 2011).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 12 Oct 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Ministry of Defence · Accepted in part · 8 Sep 2011
I can inform this House that I am accepting in principle all of his recommendations with one reservation.
Extract from: Statement on the report into the death of Mr Baha Mousa in Iraq in 2003
Delivery
●Ministry of Defence says completed · 27 Mar 2014
I am pleased to announce that the Ministry of Defence has now taken action to consider and address all the accepted recommendations in the report.
From: Baha Mousa Report, Mr Mark Francois, Minister for the Armed Forces
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.