MAI-33

Improve GMFRS Major Incident record-making

Manchester Arena Inquiry · Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 2: Emergency Response · Issued 3 November 2022 · Addressed to: Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service

Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Nov 2025)

DeliveryCabinet Office says in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service should reflect on its approach to record-making during and immediately following a Major Incident, with a view to improving the current practice.

Manchester Arena Inquiry, Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 2: Emergency Response · 3 Nov 2022 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service to improve major incident record-making. In February 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the use of body-worn video cameras was becoming more prevalent across fire and rescue services, while trained loggists and routine documentation such as command and decision logs were also widely in use (Cabinet Office, Feb 2026). Earlier, in November 2025, the United Kingdom Government recorded that the recommendation was "accepted in full" (Cabinet Office response, Nov 2025).

Sources

Cabinet Office, Feb 2026

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record above reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Government response

●UK Government · Accepted · 14 Nov 2025

Speaker not recorded. Source: Cabinet Office, Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard (government response status), 14 November 2025

Accepted in full

Response document: Manchester Arena Inquiry recommendations (GOV.UK page linking to the Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard)

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says in progress · 27 Feb 2026

In addition to previous updates, the use of body worn video cameras are becoming more prevalent in the UK FRS. The use of trained loggists and routine use of documentation to capture and record decision (for example command and decision logs) are also widely in use.

From: Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Cabinet Office · 14 Nov 2025

In addition to previous updates, the use of body worn video cameras are becoming more prevalent in the UK FRS. The use of trained loggists and routine use of documentation to capture and record decision (for example command and decision logs) are also widely in use.

From: Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, original version (data file)

Published evidence

●JESIP · 1 Apr 2024

Summary by this site of the published finding

JESIP Joint Doctrine updated to v3.1 (April 2024) following inquiry findings on interoperability failures. Operation Plato reformed to cover all terrorist attack types, not just firearms. Emphasis extended beyond command-level to frontline responders.

JESIP Joint Doctrine Version 3.1, April 2024View source →

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.