Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Lesley Higginson

Ref: 2026-0292 Date: 10 Jun 2026 Coroner: Jacqueline Devonish Area: Cheshire 1 response identified · 1 indexed addressee View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner identified a need for clarity on the ambulance service's policy for declining welfare calls and how this aligns with the police's 'Right Care Right Person' policy, which creates uncertainty about responsibility for welfare checks.

Date 10 Jun 2026
56-day deadline 8 Oct 2026 est. estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date
Responses identified 1 of 1

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner identified a need for clarity on the ambulance service's policy for declining welfare calls and how this aligns with the police's 'Right Care Right Person' policy, which creates uncertainty about responsibility for welfare checks.
View full coroner's concerns
Mrs Higginson benefitted from a care package designed for her independence and welfare, engaging a remote means of making daily contact with her in the least intrusive manner. Failed contact was followed up by a call to the ambulance service which indicated that they would not attend.

It is important to know whether there is an established policy for declining welfare calls, and if so, when it was introduced. It leaves patients in a difficult position when aligned with the constabulary Right Care Right Person (RCRP) policy which was published nationally on 23 June 2023 and implemented in the Cheshire region in January 2024. The RCRP policy states that the police in Cheshire (and in other areas nationally) will not respond to welfare check calls when healthcare are best placed to support those who may be in crisis. It is unclear from the ambulance service response whether a request for a welfare check, in the circumstances of this death, is to be deemed to be healthcare related and whether the ambulance service properly rejected the request, on the grounds stated.

Responses

1 respondent

North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust

NHS Trust
Letter dated 21 Jul 2026 PDF
AI-classified response stance Noted
AI-generated response summary

• The Concern for Welfare Response Criteria Guidelines Policy was introduced in May 2024, in response to the Right Care, Right Person (RCRP) National Partnership Agreement. • NWAS has communicated its policy on welfare call deployment to local system partners, including police, acute trusts, mental health organisations, and councils. • NWAS met with the Okay Each Day service to advise them on the circumstances for ambulance deployment in welfare calls.

View full response
Dear Ms Devonish

Regulation 28 Report – Inquest Touching the Death of Lesley Katherine Higginson

I write further to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report dated 10th June 2026, which was issued to North West Ambulance Service (“NWAS”) following the conclusion of the inquest touching the death of Lesley Katherine Higginson.

I am aware that you will share my response with Lesley’s family, and I firstly wish to express my sincere condolences to them. NWAS’ core purpose is to save lives, prevent harm and provide services which optimise the likelihood of positive patient outcomes.

Through the Regulation 28 report, you have requested that NWAS considers your matters of concern. By this letter I will address those concerns as far as I am able.

I note that the inquest took place on 4th June 2026 and that NWAS did not have Interested Person (IP) status. NWAS provided witness evidence from Connor Hayes, Paramedic, on 5th February 2026 though he was not called to give evidence. Therefore, no NWAS witnesses or representatives were in attendance at the hearing.

Through the Regulation 28 report, you have requested that NWAS considers your matters of concern and have suggested that action is taken to prevent future deaths occurring in the future. Within this letter, I will address those concerns raised as far as I am able.

Mrs Higginson benefitted from a care package designed for her independence and welfare, engaging a remote means of making daily contact with her in the least intrusive manner. Failed contact was followed up by a call to the ambulance service which indicated that they would not attend. It is important to know whether there is an established policy for declining welfare calls and when it was introduced. It leaves patients in a difficult position when aligned with the constabulary Right Care Right Person (RCRP) policy which was published nationally on 23 June 2023 and implemented in the Cheshire region in January 2024. The RCRP policy states that the police in Cheshire (and in other areas nationally) will not respond to welfare check calls when healthcare are best placed to support those who may be in crisis. It is unclear from the ambulance service response whether a request for a welfare check, in the circumstances of this death, is to be deemed to be healthcare related and whether the ambulance service properly rejected the request, on the grounds stated.

On 17th of January 2026 at 15:16 hrs a call was received from Okay Each Day, a wellbeing check service, in which the caller advised that they had attempted to contact Ms Higginson on their daily call but had not received a response. During this call, they advised that a neighbour of Ms Higginson’s had advised that they had cameras for each other, and she had seen no movement of Ms Higginson on the cameras.

This call elicited an ambulance response, and the caller was advised that there was a 1 hour 20 minute to 1 hour 50 minute response time but they may receive a call back from a Health Care Professional within that timeframe. This was accepted by the caller. An Advanced Paramedic called Okay Each Day back at 15:35hrs and advised that due to the location of Ms Higginson being unknown and a medical need for an ambulance also being unknown, an ambulance would not be deployed.

This advice was in accordance with the NWAS Concern for Welfare policy, which covers the receipt, recording, escalation and NWAS responses in relation to concern for welfare of a patient. Where such calls are received, the guidelines provide that the patient’s location needs to be known and there needs to be a confirmed medical need.

NWAS need a verified location and assurance that a patient is indeed present at the specified location where an ambulance resource is being dispatched to. Additionally, NWAS rely on accurate contact information, ensuring that any provided contact number will connect us directly with the patient. NWAS does not have the legal powers, nor the equipment, to force entry to properties.

As an ambulance service, our primary function is to prioritise and respond to the medical needs of our patients whether this is face-to-face or via other methods. A confirmed physical or mental health complaint means that the caller has evidence or good reason to believe that the patient or service user is currently suffering from a physical or mental health issue that requires either a face-to-face assessment or telephone response. It cannot be assumed that an individual being uncontactable, means that they require medical assistance. Nor do NWAS have the capacity to conduct thorough enquiries, on behalf of other services, to determine whether an individual is experiencing physical or mental health concerns. It is incumbent upon these services to arrange for and execute such inquiries autonomously.

The NWAS Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Lead has listened to the 999 calls made in respect of Ms Higginson and has confirmed that the 999 call from Okay Each Day at 15:16 hrs was handled appropriately and in line with the Concern for Welfare policy. It could not be determined that Ms Higginson was at the specified location nor could it be determined that she had a confirmed physical or mental health complaint. It was therefore correct that NWAS did not deploy an ambulance to Ms Higginson based on the information provided at the time of the call.

A subsequent call was received at 11:49 hrs on 18th January 2026. The caller was a neighbour of Ms Higginson who stated that a foot could be seen on the floor. NWAS then deployed an ambulance which arrived within 54 minutes, at 12:43 hrs. Ms Higginson was sadly declared deceased on scene at 13:03 hrs.

The Concern for Welfare Response Criteria Guidelines Policy was introduced in May 2024, in response to the Right Care, Right Person (RCRP) National Partnership Agreement. NWAS have been clear and transparent with local system partners, including the Police, Acute Trusts, Mental Health Organisations and Councils regarding the deployment of ambulances when concern for welfare calls are made to the service and the circumstances in which an ambulance will and will not be deployed. NWAS and other system partners have previously noted that there is a gap in services for members of the public who may need concern for welfare call outs and this has been discussed in both strategic and tactical RCRP meetings, but not something that NWAS are able to fulfil unilaterally.

NWAS have also met with the Okay Each Day service who have been advised as to the circumstances in which an ambulance will and will not be deployed when concern for welfare calls are received. It was recommended by NWAS that Okay Each Day explore whether they could set up a pathway with other agencies to make initial contact with a patient where their exact location cannot be determined or for them to consider their own response team to conduct these enquiries

I am grateful to you for bringing this matter to my attention and I am sorry that you felt it necessary to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report to NWAS. If you require any further clarification or information, please do not hesitate to contact me or the Trust’s Deputy Director of Corporate Affairs, Emma Shiner.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 27 January 2026 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lesley Katherine HIGGINSON aged 72. The inquest concluded on 4th June 2026.
Circumstances of the death
Ms Higginson, a medically vulnerable adult, was found deceased at her home address on 18 January 2026 following a concern for welfare raised by neighbours. Due to a desire to remain in her own home and not be attended by carers several times a day, Adult Social care arranged a package of care through SOS Homecare including medication management (epilepsy and other medication) and remote welfare checks.

Alertacall, was commissioned to ensure remote contact with her on a daily basis through a call button service known as the Okay Each Day Service. Alertacall had been unable to speak to her over the weekend she died.

Mrs Higginson also benefitted from a remote medication delivery service, The Medication Support Company. A new medication safe and computer screen had been installed in her home on 13 January 2026 which was operated remotely at fixed times of the day. She had not answered the calls on Friday 16 January resulting in a team member visit to her home. She was present.

On Saturday 17 January there was no contact with her by the medication team, and in accordance with the medication support policy an escalation visit would be due after 24 hours of no contact. A plan was made to visit to check on her welfare on Sunday 18 January but she had died prior to this visit being conducted.

In accordance with Alertacall policies and prior agreement with Mrs Higginson, a neighbour was contacted on Saturday 17 January and asked to conduct a welfare check. The neighbour, reported back that contact had not been established. Alertacall then escalated to the emergency services. The police declined attendance for a welfare call. The ambulance service accepted the welfare call initially but later called back rejecting the request to attend stating it was not their policy to accept welfare checks if there is no confirmation someone is in the property. Alertacall recontacted the neighbour who then reported having seen Mrs Higginson out riding her scooter with the dog that day. The escalation was closed having established contact with a neighbour.

On Sunday 18 January, there was no answer from Mrs Higginson to Alertacall and the neighbour raised concerns confirming that emergency services had been contacted. The ambulance service arrived at 12:34, and entry was forced by the Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service, finding Mrs Higginson deceased on her bed, and confirmed her death at 13:03.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0292
Date of report
10 June 2026
Coroner
Jacqueline Devonish
Coroner area
Cheshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 8 Oct 2026 (estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date).

Sent to

North West Ambulance Service

Source links