Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Rebecca Mclellan- Prevention of future deaths report

Date: 18 May 2026 Area: Suffolk Responses identified: 2 / 3 View PDF

A patient was without a dedicated care co-ordinator for nine weeks due to staff shortages and the absence of a documented system to manage planned, prolonged leave or ensure continuity of care.

Date 18 May 2026
56-day deadline 22 Sep 2026 est.
Responses identified 2 of 3

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A patient was without a dedicated care co-ordinator for nine weeks due to staff shortages and the absence of a documented system to manage planned, prolonged leave or ensure continuity of care.
View full coroner's concerns
On the 31st May 2023, Becca’s care co-ordinator in the Youth team went on planned, prolonged leave. On the 7th August 2023 Becca presented in significant distress to the Trust office that governed her mental health care. Due to issues with allocation, she had been without a dedicated, named care co-ordinator for approximately nine weeks. This was in part due to staff shortages. At that time, there were four vacancies out of the Youth team of sixteen. These were two Band 5, one Band 6 and a psychologist As a consequence of her distressed presentation at the Trust office, a senior mental health care practitioner urgently took over the role as Becca’s care co-ordinator An update from the NSFT dated 2nd April 2026 described the current position with regards to vacancies as one Band 6 and one Assistant Psychologist in the Youth team. There is no documented system that I consider adequately highlights and manages planned, prolonged key care co-ordinator absence in the Youth team, nor a formal, documented process that clearly and accurately ensures that the roles and responsibilities of named key care co-ordinators are adequately covered during periods of planned leave. There is no process to ensure a dedicated, named care co-ordinator is identified to the mental health patient to provide continuity of care during prolonged periods of planned leave. I consider that the risk of a lack of a dedicated and identified care co-ordinator for a significant period during planned leave creates an ongoing risk of future deaths for people with significant mental health disorders, so consider this a matter for a PFD report.

Responses

2 respondents
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust NHS Trust
13 May 2026 PDF
Noted

The Trust states that existing systems including an E-roster, team off-duty chart, daily huddle, Check and Challenge meetings, and an Early Warning Trigger Score are already in place to manage staff absence and ensure continuity of care. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Sharpstone Rebecca McLellan Inquest I refer to your letter sent by email on 6 May 2026 and am grateful for the confirmation of your views in relation to PFD regarding each of the matters set out. As indicated in the Trust's legal team letter on 6 May 2026, the Trust were not aware that you had an ongoing concern in relation to the management of key staff vacancies and absent staff in the Youth team. As such we would be grateful if you would consider the information below, as the Trust considers there is a system in place that addresses the ongoing concerns you have.
1. E-roster: this an electronic platform which holds all shifts across the Trust so that it is easy to see who is working and who is not at any given time to enable planning. Oversight of the E-Roster is undertaken by the Operational Manager and Community Team Manager identify gaps, manage staff absence, book additional temporary staff and provide an overview of how many hours a day each team has to manage capacity.
2. Team off duty chart: this is a chart of all staff within the team, noting who is on and off duty, on leave (of any type, planned or unplanned) at any given time. It also records who is responsible for covering the duty role (availability for urgent calls and referrals) on each day, and who is covering for staff that are off. This chart is held in the Youth Team Microsoft Teams channel to enable all staff who are working on and off site to access it quickly. The chart is created 2 months ahead of time and updated by the team administrator whenever there are reported absences or changes.
3. Daily huddle: This is a team meeting that takes place every morning and where any staffing and absences can be acknowledged and the team informed of any cover requirements. The off duty chart is then updated by the team administrator.
4. Early Warning Trigger Score (EWTS) Audit: this is a monthly audit providing a structured approach to the early identification of quality risks within a clinical team. Upon completion of the audit, a Trigger Score is calculated. The Community Early Warning Trigger Tool has 25 indicators to categorise the team capacity including vacancies, sickness, complaints, leadership post filled, medic posts filled, and more. This supports managers to recognise the risk within their team and escalate as necessary for support with staffing. The EWTS is used in conjunction with Clinical Audit outcomes, financial oversight and key performance indicators, and is a tool used across the Trust. Trust HQ: County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH Tel: 01603 421421 Web: www.nsft.nhs.uk

[Page 2]
5. Check and Challenge for the staff roster: this includes monthly review by Associate Director of Nursing for community of the E-roster in relation to anything that may impact on team capacity (for example staff vacancies, sickness, planned leave). This regular review began in April 2026, to ensure we are looking ahead as well as at the current capacity to enable planning of team capacity.
6. Unplanned leave process: When a care co-ordinator is on unplanned leave (sickness), their patient clinic appointments are reviewed by the Community Team Manager (CTM) and team administrator. They then re allocate the appointments to another clinician or rebook them, depending on: predicted length of sickness absence, clinical risk and the intervention need of the patient. When sickness becomes long term, this managed by the CTM who reviews the staff member’s caseload and reallocates to the rest of the team based on the patients’ acuity and intervention levels. There is also a fortnightly allocation meeting which takes place to allocate new patients but can also be utilised to discuss and re-allocate patients whose care co-ordinator is on long term absence.
7. Planned leave process: When a care co-ordinator is due to go on planned leave, they prepare a hand over of their patients, outlining their intervention level and which patients require reallocation to cover their absence. Patients are notified that their usual clinician will not be present for their next appointment and they may see a different clinician. Patients are also informed to call the duty worker and refer to their safety plan if they need support when their care co-ordinator is on leave. For patients who are receiving specific clinical interventions from their care co-ordinator, their care may be paused until the staff member returns. This is only where it is a specialist need and this is done with the patient’s consent and input.
8. Staff shortages due to vacant posts are highlighted through the EWTS audit putting in context the impact of vacancies alongside staff sickness. If the EWTS demonstrates a high score, it can trigger consideration for Business continuity for the team, reviewing capacity and what activity can be undertaken within the resources available. This would also be recorded as a risk on the trust risk register to highlight the increased risk in the team. The East Youth Team EWTS is currently 5 which would not trigger concern for the teams capacity. When staff leave, their posts are reviewed to see if the role and grade of that post meets the needs of the service or requires amendment. Posts then go through an approval process within the Trust before being advertised on NHS Jobs website and recruited to. We ensure a service user is involved with recruitment by participating on the interview panel also. There are a number of policies relevant to the management of staff absence and vacancies, as follows:
1. Annual leave policy
2. Sickness absence policy
3. Rostering policy (which provides clear parameters for the production of rosters for all wards and departments)
4. Engagement and use of Temporary Workers including Medical Locums policy
5. Transfer policy (which sets out expectations and guidance in relation to safe transfers of care, including in relation to staff changes and sickness)
6. Supporting and Managing Attendance policy (which promotes and supports staff in minimising absence from work)
7. Trust Business Continuity Management Plan policy The Trust have considered the lack of care coordinator in this case and since then, the E-roster, off duty chart, Check and Challenge and EWTS are all now in place to allow for a better continuation of care despite both planned and unplanned staff leave.

[Page 3] I hope that this further information will assist you in consideration of whether to issue a PFD, or in the drafting of the PFD. If you require any further information, I would be very happy to provide it.
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust NHS Trust
16 Jul 2026 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust has prepared and ratified a guidance note for staff to document and consistently apply processes for managing planned, prolonged care coordinator absence in the Youth Team. This includes procedures for patient handover, re-allocation decisions via MDT, patient notification, and joint appointments. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Sharpstone Regulations 28 and 29 (Coroners Investigations Regulations 2013) notification made in response to the death of Rebecca McLellan I write to you in respect of Rebecca McLellan who sadly died on 20 November 2023. Her inquest concluded on 25 March 2026, and you subsequently raised a concern within a prevention of future deaths report, issued on 18 May 2026. Your concern is that: There is no documented system that I consider adequately highlights and manages planned, prolonged key care co-ordinator absence in the Youth team, nor a formal, documented process that clearly and accurately ensures that the roles and responsibilities of named key care co-ordinators are adequately covered during periods of planned leave. There is no process to ensure a dedicated, named care co-ordinator is identified to the mental health patient to provide continuity of care during prolonged periods of planned leave. As explained in the attached letter to you dated 13 May 2026 (enclosed), there are specific processes in place both for planned and unplanned leave. I note your concern set out in the prevention of future deaths report, specifically relates to the management of planned and prolonged absence of care-coordinators in the Youth Team however. Planned, prolonged leave may include maternity/paternity leave or planned sick leave. The process to manage prolonged, planned leave of a care-coordinator in the Youth Team is as set out below:
- At the point that a care co-ordinator’s prolonged absence is planned, they will no longer have any new patients allocated to them.
- In advance of their absence, the care co-ordinator prepares a hand over of their patients which outlines their intervention level.
- In addition, at the care co-ordinator’s supervisions with their line manager in the run up to their absence, there is discussion about the care co-ordinator’s patients and management of the planned leave, supported by the handover document.
- At MDT meetings, each patient and their clinical need is discussed. In the context of care co-ordinator going on planned leave, these MDT discussions support the Clinical Team Manager to determine which patients require re-allocation during the planned leave and which do not.
- The decision about re-allocation is made at the most appropriate time (based on the patient’s presentation at the time and known history), in the lead up to the care co-ordinator’s absence. The Trust HQ: County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH Tel: 01603 421421 Web: www.nsft.nhs.uk

[Page 2] expectation is that a decision will be made for all patients prior to the last two planned visits by the care co-ordinator before their leave.
- Individual patients are notified by their care co-ordinator of the plans to manage their absence in advance. How that is done will be dependant on what is most appropriate for the patient, but when a decision is made to re-allocate a patient to a new care co-ordinator, they are notified of this at the penultimate appointment with their usual care coordinator. Then the final appointment before the care co-ordinator’s leave is a joint appointment with the original and the new care coordinator to support a positive transition between staff. To ensure the process is documented and applied consistently across all community services, the Trust has prepared and ratified a guidance note for staff (enclosed). Rebecca’s tragic death has brought about change within the Trust, as set out in the evidence provided to the Court by , Director of Nursing and Quality for East Suffolk, both during the inquest and subsequently. We trust that the above information addresses your concern. Finally, I wish to join my colleagues in offering our deepest condolences to Rebecca’s family and friends for their tragic loss.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 23rd March 2026 I resumed the Inquest into the death of Rebecca Jessie Mclellan (known as Becca) The conclusion of the Inquest on the 25th March 2026 was Suicide The Medical cause of death was given as: 1a) Hanging
Circumstances of the death
On 20th November 2023 Police forced entry into Becca’s flat after concerns were raised by a colleague Becca was found hanging [REDACTED] Becca had left a final note and letters The Postmortem concluded that her death was due to hanging Becca was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in July 2022. She had been started on Aripiprazole but this was not tolerated Becca had an initial mental health assessment on the 26th October 2022 when she described pressure of speech and agitation with intermittent suicidal thoughts but no plans or intent She saw a Consultant Psychiatrist on the 22nd November 2022 and was started on Lamotrigine: she was in a mildly manic state A referral to the ADHD team was made in March 2023. Becca did not see the ADHD team before her death Becca had an urgent mental health review on the 23rd March 2023 as she was feeling flat At review on the 5th April 2023 Becca was flat in mood with a number of life stressors At her mental health assessment on 25th May 2023, Becca had made a concrete plan with a ligature and a piece of rope A further review took place on 30th May, noting Becca’s mood had stabilised. [REDACTED]mg Becca was functioning well and felt Lamotrigine          mg a day was helping her On the 7th August 2023 she presented in significant distress to the Trust. She had been without a dedicated care coordinator for approximately 9 weeks There was an urgent assessment with a Senior mental health care practitioner who then reviewed Becca formally on the 10th August 2023 There was a further mental health review on the 16th August 2023, with Becca complaining of low mood, life stressors and being unhappy about lack of follow-up due to the absence of her care co-ordinator Becca wasn’t keen on increasing the dose of Lamotrigine due to side effects: fluoxetine was started with monitoring for hypomania On 14th September 2023 Becca said that the fluoxetine had improved her mood There was a plan to refer her to the eating disorders team in October 2023. Her BMI was 16.4 at that time. She didn’t see the eating disorders team prior to her death In late October 2023, Becca developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome secondary to her Lamotrigine. The Lamotrigine was slowly reduced. She remained on Fluoxetine At her mental health assessment on 13th November 2023 Becca sounded flat in affect. She was anxious about starting Lithium as her Lamotrigine was being tailed off.
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths as detailed above, and I believe you or your organisation have the power to take any such action you identify.
Copies sent to
1. [REDACTED]2. [REDACTED]3. [REDACTED]4. [REDACTED]Daniel Sharpstone,  HM Assistant Coroner for Suffolk. 18th May 2026

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Date of report
18 May 2026
Coroner area
Suffolk

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 3
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 22 Sep 2026 (estimated).

Sent to

1. Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (NSFT)
report, namely by 18th July 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period if an appropriate application is made.
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this

Source links