Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Derek Edward Bartlett Twivey
Ref: 2013-0175
Date: 30 Jul 2013
Coroner: Elisabeth Bussey-Jones
Area: West Sussex
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
The coroner's concern relates to circumstances that could create a risk of future deaths, and action should be taken to prevent such occurrences.
Date
30 Jul 2013
56-day deadline
24 Sep 2013 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
The coroner's concern relates to circumstances that could create a risk of future deaths, and action should be taken to prevent such occurrences.
View full coroner's concerns
continue to exist in the future, and in the Coroner’s opinion, action should be taken to prevent the occurrence or continuation of such circumstances, or to eliminate or reduce the risk of death created by such circumstances, the Coroner may report the circumstances to a person who may have the power to take such action. Summary of the facts Mr Twivey had had a history of a number of admissions to hospital prior to November 2012. He was further admitted on the 27th November to the Beckett Ward at Worthing Hospital. He was transferred to the Buckingham Ward on the 29th November. On the 16th December he suffered a fall at hospital. As he had sustained a head injury a CT Scan was requested. The scan performed that day showed no signs of bleeding and the findings were similar to the results of scans carried out in October 2012. The Doctor treating him on the Buckingham Ward felt a diagnosis of dementia could not be made at that time. On the 22nd December 2013 he was discharged from Worthing Hospital to the Fairlight Nursing Home as part of a ‘step down’ program. Prior to his transfer, a
[Page 2] full assessment had been conducted at Worthing Hospital by on behalf of the Nursing Home. The assessment was conducted to consider suitability of the placement, bearing in mind Mr Twivey’s needs. It was appreciated at the time that he was a patient with a high falls risk. He arrived at Fairlight Nursing Home on the afternoon of Saturday, 22nd December. Between 530am on the 23rd December 2012 and 430 am on the 24th December 2012, Mr Twivey suffered 5 falls at the nursing home. The fall at 530am on 23rd December resulted in him being found on the floor with tear to his right ear. At 2050 hours on Sunday 23rd December he was again found on floor with the wound to his ear having re-opened. Later that day at 2330 hours he was found on the floor bleeding again from the same location. On Monday 24th December the registered manager for the Nursing Home, had concerns as to whether Fairlight was a suitable location for Mr Twivey. I understand she had not been on duty over the weekend. She contacted his Community Psychiatric Nurse but did not manage to get through to them at that time. In evidence indicated concerns as to suitability of accommodation probably arose on Sunday 24th December. It had been anticipated that a risk assessment should have been conducted within 24 hours of Mr Twivey arriving at the Nursing Home. From the evidence heard it would appear this did not occur because it was a weekend and there was a pressure on staffing levels due to the time of year. On Tuesday 25th December, Mr Twivey was readmitted to Worthing Hospital. He was noted to have left sided weakness. A CT Scan performed showed subdural haematomas. This was described as a new finding. He remained in Worthing Hospital and passed away there on the 16th of January 2013. He was 91 years of age. Matters of Concern During the course of the inquest my enquiries revealed matters giving rise to two areas of concern. Those matters are as follows: (a)The need to carry out a risk assessment within 24 hours regardless of staffing levels or time of year; and (b)The timeliness of steps to be taken if it is appreciated shortly after admission that the accommodation is not suitable for the patient’s needs. In my opinion action should be taken in order to prevent the risk of future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. You are required to respond to this letter within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 1st October 2013. If you are unable to reply within this time, you may apply for an extension. The response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action. If no action is to be taken, you must explain why no action is proposed. A copy of this report is being sent to the Chief Coroner and to who was identified as an interested person at the inquest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
[Page 3] The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Yours sincerely, Elisabeth Bussey-Jones Assistant Coroner for West Sussex
[Page 2] full assessment had been conducted at Worthing Hospital by on behalf of the Nursing Home. The assessment was conducted to consider suitability of the placement, bearing in mind Mr Twivey’s needs. It was appreciated at the time that he was a patient with a high falls risk. He arrived at Fairlight Nursing Home on the afternoon of Saturday, 22nd December. Between 530am on the 23rd December 2012 and 430 am on the 24th December 2012, Mr Twivey suffered 5 falls at the nursing home. The fall at 530am on 23rd December resulted in him being found on the floor with tear to his right ear. At 2050 hours on Sunday 23rd December he was again found on floor with the wound to his ear having re-opened. Later that day at 2330 hours he was found on the floor bleeding again from the same location. On Monday 24th December the registered manager for the Nursing Home, had concerns as to whether Fairlight was a suitable location for Mr Twivey. I understand she had not been on duty over the weekend. She contacted his Community Psychiatric Nurse but did not manage to get through to them at that time. In evidence indicated concerns as to suitability of accommodation probably arose on Sunday 24th December. It had been anticipated that a risk assessment should have been conducted within 24 hours of Mr Twivey arriving at the Nursing Home. From the evidence heard it would appear this did not occur because it was a weekend and there was a pressure on staffing levels due to the time of year. On Tuesday 25th December, Mr Twivey was readmitted to Worthing Hospital. He was noted to have left sided weakness. A CT Scan performed showed subdural haematomas. This was described as a new finding. He remained in Worthing Hospital and passed away there on the 16th of January 2013. He was 91 years of age. Matters of Concern During the course of the inquest my enquiries revealed matters giving rise to two areas of concern. Those matters are as follows: (a)The need to carry out a risk assessment within 24 hours regardless of staffing levels or time of year; and (b)The timeliness of steps to be taken if it is appreciated shortly after admission that the accommodation is not suitable for the patient’s needs. In my opinion action should be taken in order to prevent the risk of future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. You are required to respond to this letter within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 1st October 2013. If you are unable to reply within this time, you may apply for an extension. The response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action. If no action is to be taken, you must explain why no action is proposed. A copy of this report is being sent to the Chief Coroner and to who was identified as an interested person at the inquest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
[Page 3] The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Yours sincerely, Elisabeth Bussey-Jones Assistant Coroner for West Sussex
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Draw up maternity risk assessment protocol
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Audit maternity and paediatric services
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Nutritional screening
Waterhouse Inquiry
Require comprehensive child needs assessment before admission to care
Waterhouse Inquiry
Follow emergency child admissions with comprehensive assessment within prescribed period
Waterhouse Inquiry
Base care plans on comprehensive assessment, prepared with child consultation
Waterhouse Inquiry
Require social worker assessment and inter-departmental consultation before residential school placement
Southport Inquiry
Shared multi-agency risk-assessment tool
Southport Inquiry
LCC online harms risk assessment review
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Amend GLOS to allow claimants oral submissions at panel hearings
Report details
- Reference
- 2013-0175
- Date of report
- 30 July 2013
- Coroner
- Elisabeth Bussey-Jones
- Coroner area
- West Sussex
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 24 Sep 2013 (estimated).
Sent to
- Fairlight Nursing Home