Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Brian Belfield
Ref: 2013-0270
Date: 21 Oct 2013
Coroner: Robert Chapman
Area: Cumbria (North and West)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Failures in race management included an inaccurate system for tracking participants, lack of a single responsible person for checks, and unreliable communication between race control and marshals, leading to a missing runner.
Date
21 Oct 2013
56-day deadline
17 Dec 2013
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Failures in race management included an inaccurate system for tracking participants, lack of a single responsible person for checks, and unreliable communication between race control and marshals, leading to a missing runner.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) No system was in place to ensure that an accurate record was kept, and referred to, of the participants in the race and those who had retired so that at the conclusion of the race it could be easily ascertained if anyone was missing.
(2) The emphasis was on counting the total numbers of participants and retirees, rather than checking off the race numbers against an accurate record of the race numbers of those who had started. Thus, as happened in Mr Belfield’s case an inaccurate count meant that there was no recognition that one runner was missing.
(3) There did not appear to be any one single person, either the race organiser, or a nominated official in the race organisation, who had the responsibility to check the race numbers of those starting with the race numbers of those finishing, taking into account the race numbers of those who have retired. A single person should have had that responsibility.
(4) There was no reliable means of communication between the race control and the marshals out on the fells so that each of them were aware of the number of
David Ll. Roberts Ll.B Her
5 D&E Lakeland Business Park Lamplugh Road, Cockermouth. Cumbria. CA13 0QT west@cumbria.gov.uk (01900) 706902 ax: (01900) 706915 Majesty’s Senior Coroner ______ North and West Cumbria hmcoroner.north Tel: F (5) Thus it was not possible to “monitor” the runners around the course as required by the FRA Safety Requirement number 13. The higher the “risk” to participants in the race, because of terrain, weather conditions, length of the race etc, the higher the need for an effective means of communication, which should be planned into the preparations for the race participants in the race, those who had retired, and where they had retired.
(6) When the marshal at checkpoint 3 notified race control of an inaccurate number of runners who passed through checkpoint 3 there was no consideration or investigation as to the reasons for the inaccuracies.
(7) There is potential for an element of “number confusion” if left over race numbers are used or reused. There should be an emphasis for allocated race numbers to start with the figure 1 rather than the figure 0
(2) The emphasis was on counting the total numbers of participants and retirees, rather than checking off the race numbers against an accurate record of the race numbers of those who had started. Thus, as happened in Mr Belfield’s case an inaccurate count meant that there was no recognition that one runner was missing.
(3) There did not appear to be any one single person, either the race organiser, or a nominated official in the race organisation, who had the responsibility to check the race numbers of those starting with the race numbers of those finishing, taking into account the race numbers of those who have retired. A single person should have had that responsibility.
(4) There was no reliable means of communication between the race control and the marshals out on the fells so that each of them were aware of the number of
David Ll. Roberts Ll.B Her
5 D&E Lakeland Business Park Lamplugh Road, Cockermouth. Cumbria. CA13 0QT west@cumbria.gov.uk (01900) 706902 ax: (01900) 706915 Majesty’s Senior Coroner ______ North and West Cumbria hmcoroner.north Tel: F (5) Thus it was not possible to “monitor” the runners around the course as required by the FRA Safety Requirement number 13. The higher the “risk” to participants in the race, because of terrain, weather conditions, length of the race etc, the higher the need for an effective means of communication, which should be planned into the preparations for the race participants in the race, those who had retired, and where they had retired.
(6) When the marshal at checkpoint 3 notified race control of an inaccurate number of runners who passed through checkpoint 3 there was no consideration or investigation as to the reasons for the inaccuracies.
(7) There is potential for an element of “number confusion” if left over race numbers are used or reused. There should be an emphasis for allocated race numbers to start with the figure 1 rather than the figure 0
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 2 May 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Brian Belfield, aged 63. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 26th September 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was:
The Cause of death was:
1.a. Exposure and Hypothermia
The Narrative Conclusion was:
On the 29th April 2012 Mr Belfield registered as a competitor in the Buttermere Sailbeck Fell Race. He was a seasoned fell runner and had run this race in previous years. During the course of the race the weather became very poor with cold temperatures, high winds, driving rain, and poor visibility, particularly on the route between Causey Pike and Crag Hill.
S:\Statutory functions\Rule 43 and PFD\Post April 2013\Belfield 2013-0270.doc
At some point between Sail and Crag Hill Mr Belfield left the race route and descended the fell-side at a place called Scar Crag. This was a difficult place to descend without good knowledge of the area, and especially in the poor prevailing weather conditions. There was no recognised track or path at this point to the bottom of the valley. It is likely that Mr Belfield took this route in order to shelter from the poor weather conditions and as a means of retiring from the race and returning to Buttermere.
During the course of the descent Mr Belfield slipped on slippery moss falling and sliding a number of feet on his back, and in the process suffering abrasions and concussion. He came to rest in a pool of water from a stream, and it appears he became unconscious and died as a result of exposure and hypothermia. His death would have occurred shortly after his fall. After a search by a Mountain Rescue Team and an RAF helicopter he was found the next day.
The organisers of the Race had miscalculated the number of runners and those who had retired and as a result they had not realised that Mr. Belfield was missing until his Wife had raised the alarm when he had not returned to their lodgings.
The Cause of death was:
1.a. Exposure and Hypothermia
The Narrative Conclusion was:
On the 29th April 2012 Mr Belfield registered as a competitor in the Buttermere Sailbeck Fell Race. He was a seasoned fell runner and had run this race in previous years. During the course of the race the weather became very poor with cold temperatures, high winds, driving rain, and poor visibility, particularly on the route between Causey Pike and Crag Hill.
S:\Statutory functions\Rule 43 and PFD\Post April 2013\Belfield 2013-0270.doc
At some point between Sail and Crag Hill Mr Belfield left the race route and descended the fell-side at a place called Scar Crag. This was a difficult place to descend without good knowledge of the area, and especially in the poor prevailing weather conditions. There was no recognised track or path at this point to the bottom of the valley. It is likely that Mr Belfield took this route in order to shelter from the poor weather conditions and as a means of retiring from the race and returning to Buttermere.
During the course of the descent Mr Belfield slipped on slippery moss falling and sliding a number of feet on his back, and in the process suffering abrasions and concussion. He came to rest in a pool of water from a stream, and it appears he became unconscious and died as a result of exposure and hypothermia. His death would have occurred shortly after his fall. After a search by a Mountain Rescue Team and an RAF helicopter he was found the next day.
The organisers of the Race had miscalculated the number of runners and those who had retired and as a result they had not realised that Mr. Belfield was missing until his Wife had raised the alarm when he had not returned to their lodgings.
Circumstances of the death
As set out in the Narrative Verdict, above.
Copies sent to
following
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Review CCTV monitoring SIA licence requirements
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Enact Protect Duty into law
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Establish standard for event healthcare services
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Mandatory Ambulance Liaison Officer at events
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Employer requirement to train in first aid
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Review licensing for security contractors
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
On-Call Consultant Display
Vale of Leven Inquiry
24/7 IPC cover
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Increase driver briefing frequency with safety as primary agenda item
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Establish and apply criteria for signallers exceeding maximum 72-hour work week
Report details
- Reference
- 2013-0270
- Date of report
- 21 October 2013
- Coroner
- Robert Chapman
- Coroner area
- Cumbria (North and West)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 17 Dec 2013.
Sent to
- Fell Runners Association