Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Edwin Thompson
Ref: 2014-0542
Date: 22 Dec 2014
Coroner: Terence Carney
Area: Gateshead & South Tyneside
Responses identified: 0 / 2
View PDF
A clear, concise directive is needed for care home staff to promptly seek medical advice for residents experiencing pain, especially if it suggests a cardiac issue.
Date
22 Dec 2014
56-day deadline
9 Mar 2015
Responses identified
0 of 2
Coroner's concerns
A clear, concise directive is needed for care home staff to promptly seek medical advice for residents experiencing pain, especially if it suggests a cardiac issue.
View full coroner's concerns
A The seeking of medical advice and assistance. There is a need to draft and disseminate to all care staff a clear, simple and concise directive to care home staff to seek medical advice or assistance in respect of residents presenting with pain, particularly of a cardiac nature without delay. Staff with no medical qualification must not seek to speculate as to possible causes of symptoms and should not seek to medicate ( unless otherwise previously prescribed by a Medical Practitioner) or prescribe “remedies” of no or no known worth to anyone in their care. B As to Training Training in the practices and protocols within the establishment should be formalised, regularised and directed as a personalised package to all staff. It should be the subject of planned periodic review and revision throughout the year and an integral part of the established annual appraisal of staff members and their performance. The quality and effectiveness of in house training provision should be an integral and essential element in and of the periodic appraisal of management performance. C As to record keeping The accurate recording of incidents affecting the care and management of residents is an essential tool in keeping staff informed of the needs of residents in order that the staff can be better able to react respond and plan for the essential needs of residents. The quality of the recording of notes must be evaluated by management on their regular reviews of residents care notes and staff must be made aware in a timely fashion of any shortcomings in the notes and their content. Assistance to improve in the recording of notes must be given an urgent priority in any training needs and recognised as a significant performance issue if there is consistent failure to adhere to the expected standard. Ultimately and aspirationally a computer based system of record keeping would be the preferred option, but the lesson of effective record keeping in whatever format, has to be reinforced by regular and effective file checks by Managers. Action Should be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. Your Response
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 9th March 2015. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. Copies & Publication
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons {NAMES} {and to the Local Safe-Guarding board (where the deceased was under 18)}. I have also sent it to the {NAMED PERSON} who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Date: 22nd December 2014 {Signature}
Senior Coroner – Gateshead & South Tyneside
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. Your Response
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 9th March 2015. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. Copies & Publication
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons {NAMES} {and to the Local Safe-Guarding board (where the deceased was under 18)}. I have also sent it to the {NAMED PERSON} who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Date: 22nd December 2014 {Signature}
Senior Coroner – Gateshead & South Tyneside
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Apply full and fair meaning consistently across all schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Allow 3-month window to accept Fixed Sum Offer after assessment
Urology Services Inquiry
Board and senior leadership development
Urology Services Inquiry
Medical leadership and doctors in difficulty
Urology Services Inquiry
Urology Service
Urology Services Inquiry
Cancer Services
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Implementation monitoring group
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Public learning disability performance dashboard within 12 months
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Restraint and seclusion observation records
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Independent care plan reviews
Report details
- Reference
- 2014-0542
- Date of report
- 22 December 2014
- Coroner
- Terence Carney
- Coroner area
- Gateshead & South Tyneside
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 2
2 responses not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 9 Mar 2015.
Sent to
- Quality Care Commission
- South Tyneside Council