Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Diana Hughes

Ref: 2015-0195 Date: 18 May 2015 Coroner: Katy Skerrett Area: Gloucestershire Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Concerns relate to the communication of 'special instructions' to medical personnel during surgical procedures via the WHO/Surgical checklist.

Date 18 May 2015
56-day deadline 13 Jul 2015 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Community health care and emergency services related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Concerns relate to the communication of 'special instructions' to medical personnel during surgical procedures via the WHO/Surgical checklist.
View full coroner's concerns
The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows. — (1) How ‘special instructions’ during a surgical procedure are communicated to other medical personnel via the WHO / Surgical checklist.

__|

_————— Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corintum Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tet 01452 305661 | Fax 01452 412618

Responses

1 respondent
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust NHS Trust
PDF
Action Planned

The Trust is considering amending the WHO surgical checklist and reviewing its documentation policy to improve recording of special instructions for post-operative care. Progress will be monitored through the Safety Experience and Risk Group. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Skerrett Diana Ruth Hughes am writing in response to the Regulation 28 report received from You on 22n May 2015 in connection with the inquest into the death of Mrs Hughes. have read the report carefully and have discussed this case with the Trust's legal representative can confirm that as a result of the Trust's own internal investigation undertaken before the inquest, the following actions were identified, and work on these actions in underway: Consideration is being given to amending the WHOISurgical checklist document to include an additional instruction to direct staff at the end of the procedure to check whether 'special instructions for post-operative care have been physically written on the operation note_ 2 Consideration is being given to a review of the Trust documentation policy to establish that the record of the surgicalloperative procedure should be completed on new operation note document specifically designed to record that clinical information. In Mrs Hughes' case , the operation notes were written onto a medical continuation sheet; in red pen: This is currently acceptable Trust policy. 3_ It is also intended that any new operation note document incorporates heading to specifically identify 'Special Instructions' for post-operative care This work is led by Consultant General Surgeon and Speciality Director for Surgery, Who gave evidence at your enquiry: The progress of these actions will be monitored through the monthly meetings of the Safety Experience and Risk Group (SERG) chaired byE Director of Safety: Chair: Professor Clair Chilvers DSc Chief Executive: Dr Frank Harsent PhD, MBA WWW gloshospitals nhs uk BETTER FOR YOU Katy being

Gloucestershire Hospitals [NHS] NHS Foundation Trust hope this is the information you require. Please do not hesitate to contact me if | can be of further assistance

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 15/01/2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Diana Ruth Hughes. The inquest was concluded on the 6/05/2015. She died of septicaemia caused by a necrotising fasciitis which had developed following her cholecystectomy, and a narrative conclusion was given.
Circumstances of the death
This 66 year old lady was admitted to hospital for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the 8" January 2014. A single dose of prophylactic antibiotic was given before the procedure. No further antibiotics were administered until approximately 36 hours later. The surgery was converted to an open procedure due to complications found during the procedure. Mrs Hughes’ surgeon requested that she be admitted to a surgical ward for a minimum of 48 hours. However she remained in the Day Surgery unit until 0900 hours on the 9" January 2014. Post-operatively Mrs Hughes developed tachycardia from 12.30pm on the g™ January. The nursing team attempted to contact the surgical team. Mrs Hughes did not receive a post operative review by the surgical team until the evening of the g" January when her condition rapidly deteriorated. At 19.25 hours a crash call was put out. She was returned to theatre and an emergency exploratory laparotomy was carried out, which revealed widespread infection and infarction of the bowel. It is probable that the widespread infection would not have proved fatal if Mrs Hughes had received antibiotic treatment, as opposed to a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics. Mrs Hughes remained critically ill throughout the emergency laparotomy. She passed away in the recovery room at 21.55 hours
Action should be taken
nn ==» ee ooo a |

9 Dated 18" May 2015

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action.
Copies sent to
for GloucestershireEES SSS SS Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 | Fax 01452 412618

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0195
Date of report
18 May 2015
Coroner
Katy Skerrett
Coroner area
Gloucestershire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 13 Jul 2015 (estimated).

Sent to

Not Listed

Source links