Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust states that an appropriate policy was in place at the time of the prescription of amiodarone and that this was followed during the inpatient stay and communicated to the GP. Since this case, but not because of it, an Amiodarone Passport and Patient Handheld Information Booklet has been developed which provides information about the drug, including the monitoring regime and the potential life-threatening side effects. (AI summary)
View full response
cough at each review relating to possible pulmonary toxicity. It also confirms the further tests to be undertaken if there is suspected pulmonary toxicity The amiodarone in this case, was initially prescribed by STHFT on 16 October 2013 whilst the patient was an in-patient; following development of atrial fibrillation. It was determined by the cardiologists that this should continue post discharge, and this was confirmed via the in-patient discharge summary dated 20 October 2013,a copy of which is documented to have been given to the patient and also will have been sent to the GP (in Sheffield this goes to GPs electronically, but is printed off and sent to practices outside of Sheffield) This correspondence also referred the GP to an internet link to the Shared Care Protocol and also summarised the hospital physician and GP responsibilities (Appendix 2). A further letter was sent to the GP on 5 November 2013 (Appendix 3) which included the following: "Post operatively he developed atrial fibrillation and therefore was started on treatment with amiodarone This is to be continued in the community and we would be grateful if you could carry out the tests as per the agreed protocol. We will see Mr Bows in clinic in 6 weeks time with an ECG on arrival where further decisions regarding the amiodarone can be made. As is transpired the amiodarone was then stopped with immediate effect (as the patient had reverted to a sinus rhythm) at the out-patient appointment referred to, which took place on 27 November 2013_ This was confirmed to the patient during that appointment and the plan was also communicated to the GP by letter of 29 November 2013 (Appendix 4) 2 With regard to the development of amiodarone toxicity, heard evidence that should this complication develop it usually does so within the first twelve months or so of commencing this and linked with (1) above, there was nothing before me to suggest primary care providers, or indeed secondary care prescribers, were taking steps to ensure there was adequate monitoring during this period: This Trust would be responsible for baseline monitoring and monitoring during the loading dose_ From review of the medical records the appropriate tests were carried out: It is not known what reviews were undertaken in the community, but monitoring tests are largely undertaken at 6 and 12 months, unless there is any suspected pulmonary toxicity or other side effects in the meantime. The patient was on the amiodarone prescribed by STHFT for around 6 weeks: therefore believe that an appropriate protocol was in place at the time of the prescription of amiodarone and that this was followed during the inpatient stay and communicated to the GP_ Since this case, but not because of it, to further improve the safety of patients taking amiodarone , an Amiodarone Passport and Patient Handheld Information Booklet has been developed which provides information about the drug, including the monitoring regime and the potential life threatening side effects (Appendix 5). hope that the above satisfies you that the Trust has an appropriate policy in place , of which is to ensure that this is also communicated to GPs Please do not hesitate to contact me if can be of any further assistance or provide any further information in respect of these issues.