Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Karen Clayton

Ref: 2015-0388 Date: 15 Sep 2015 Coroner: John Pollard Area: Manchester (South) Responses identified: 1 / 2 View PDF

The road layout has insufficient segregation for mixed traffic, with a confusing contra-flow cycle lane and unclear signage, creating a dangerous environment compounded by weak guidance on pedestrian use of cycle paths.

Date 15 Sep 2015
56-day deadline 11 Nov 2015
Responses identified 1 of 2
Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The road layout has insufficient segregation for mixed traffic, with a confusing contra-flow cycle lane and unclear signage, creating a dangerous environment compounded by weak guidance on pedestrian use of cycle paths.
View full coroner's concerns
At this location there is mixed traffic, being pedestrian, bicycle and motor: There is insufficient room for all these different forms of traffic to be effectively segregated (Trafford) Although this is a "one way" route for most traffic, the cycle lane allows for bicycles to travel in a contra flow. This is inherently confusing and dangerous for the cyclists and other road users (Trafford) The signage in the immediate area is unclear and possibly confusing(Trafford) Because of the location of the Supermarket and the lay out of the road, there_is an obvious crossing-place via the cycle Not to use this route The 30"_ riding The doing path: by pedestrians intending to walk to the railway station would nvolve them in crossing the road twice (Trafford)
5. The guidance in the "Highway Code" and elsewhere relating to the fact that pedestrians should not walk in a cycle path; is weak and needs to be re-written and reinforced: (Secretary of State for Transport)

Responses

1 respondent
Trafford Council Local Authority / Fire Service
17 Nov 2015 PDF
Disputed

Trafford Council states that the current road layout was designed in accordance with guidance, does not concur that there is insufficient room for traffic segregation, and does not consider that there are any improvements required. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Pollard Moss Lane; Altrincham Ref: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths following the inquest of Karen Clayton (Deceased) refer to your letter dated 23r September 2015 regarding the above matter and would comment as follows in relation to items to 4 of your concerns. apologise for the to this response_ The current layout of the section of Moss Lane between Manor Road and Stamford New Road was designed in accordance with the Department of Transport guidance, namely 'Traffic Advisory Leaflet 6/98 September 1998' for Contraflow cycling and was constructed in November 2002. Physical segregation of cyclists and vehicular traffic was provided at the and exit from the one way street because there was sufficient room to do s0 and the route is lined and signed in accordance with this document This layout also corresponds with Transport for Greater Manchester's current 'Greater Manchester Cycling Design Guidance' document: The Council does not concur that there is insufficient room for the three forms of traffic to be effectively segregated on this road. Following its introduction no recorded injury accidents had taken place on this link until the accident in question and there havent been any recorded accidents to date since: It is the Councils opinion that the current layout is not confusing and pedestrians who walk along the mandatory cycle lane do so knowingly to shorten their journey- There are controlled crossings on Moss Lane at the traffic signals junctions at either end of its one way section and the Council does not consider that pedestrians travelling between the railway station and the Tesco Supermarket have to cross the road twice to reach their destination. The Council takes Road Safety seriously and whilst this is an extremely unfortunate incident and Trafford Council regrets the tragic road traffic accident that led to the fatal injuries sustained by Mrs Clayton the Council does not consider that there are any improvements required in this instance for the reasons stated above_ Date: delay entry

hope that the information above provides an assurance that the findings of your report have been considered but if you have any specific enquires please do not hesitate to contact me.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 8th January 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Karen Clayton dob 10th January 1965 investigation concluded on the June 2015 and the conclusion was one of Accidental death. The medical cause of death was Ia Traumatic subdural haematoma
Circumstances of the death
On the 2nd January 2015 at Moss Lane, Altrincham; Mrs Clayton was her bicycle in a designated cycle lane: As she traversed the brow of the railway overbridge, she was confronted by a group of youths walking in the cycle iane. youths made efforts to step off the cycle lane but were prevented from so by the narrowness of the lane; a collision then took place between the cyclist and one of the pedestrians. The cyclist fell to the ground and sustained what proved to be fatal head injuries.
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action_

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0388
Date of report
15 September 2015
Coroner
John Pollard
Coroner area
Manchester (South)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 11 Nov 2015.

Sent to

Secretary of State for Transport
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council

Source links