Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Fiona Lewis
Ref: 2015-0441
Date: 17 Sep 2015
Coroner: Dr Peter dean
Area: Suffolk
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
There's a concern about ensuring healthcare professionals are adequately trained in resuscitation and can respond appropriately to patient collapse.
Date
17 Sep 2015
56-day deadline
12 Nov 2015 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
There's a concern about ensuring healthcare professionals are adequately trained in resuscitation and can respond appropriately to patient collapse.
View full coroner's concerns
Although, in the very sad circumstances of the death of Fiona Luis, any problems in respect of resuscitation at the time of the collapse are unlikely to have affected the outcome for the reasons given above, it is clearly important that there is confidence that health care professionals involved with patient care are adequately trained in resuscitation and able to respond appropriately in the event of a collapse occurring.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On the 8th of April 2015, I resumed the inquest into the death of FIONA MARGARET PATRICIA LEWIS. The conclusion at the end of inquest was that the death was due to Natural Causes, however there were circumstances in respect of this very sad death that gave rise to concern.
Circumstances of the death
Fiona Luis was admitted to Ipswich Hospital on the 5th of September 2014 following a three week period of symptoms which had initially suggested a possible orthopaedic problem, although there was then concern that there was an underlying neurological component to her condition. There were clearly difficulties in obtaining a clinical diagnosis for the condition in life, which were looked into at the inquest given her son’s concerns here, but her condition sadly deteriorated and she passed away at Ipswich Hospital on the 13th of September 2014. By that time an underlying malignancy was suspected but not proven, and the cause of death was found by an independent pathologist to be from Disseminated Carcinoma. No primary mass could be identified at post mortem examination. Medical management and diagnostic issues were explored at the inquest, as stated above. There were, however, concerns raised after the death by one of the nursing staff that health care professionals working on the ward had failed to initiate prompt resuscitation following the collapse, despite Fiona Luis still being for resuscitation in the event of a collapse occurring, and that, once the problem was recognised, appropriate knowledge or ability in respect of resuscitation was not displayed by those health care professionals. These matters were explored at the inquest, but there was evidence that it was unlikely that failure of prompt resuscitation would have altered the outcome here in view of CSF involvement by tumour.
Action should be taken
2 While there was clearly evidence that there was resuscitation training in place within the hospital, what was more difficult was assessing how effective that training had been. In order to minimise the risk of resuscitation associated problems compromising the chances of a successful outcome following a collapse, I would ask that the way in which resuscitation training is provided within the hospital be reviewed and consideration be given as to how the effectiveness of that training can be assessed and audited.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Southport Inquiry
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Taxi driver duty to report criminal activity
Report details
- Reference
- 2015-0441
- Date of report
- 17 September 2015
- Coroner
- Dr Peter dean
- Coroner area
- Suffolk
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 12 Nov 2015 (estimated).
Sent to
- Ipswich Hospital