Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Jonathan Sellman

Ref: 2016-0395 Date: 17 Aug 2016 Coroner: Peter Dorries Area: South Yorkshire (West) Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Water pooling on a busy road and verges that could propel cars over safety barriers create hazardous driving conditions, despite the drainage being considered operative.

Date 17 Aug 2016
56-day deadline 25 Oct 2016
Responses identified 1 of 1
Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Water pooling on a busy road and verges that could propel cars over safety barriers create hazardous driving conditions, despite the drainage being considered operative.
View full coroner's concerns
During the course f the investigation : _ (1) Water appears to be pooling on the carriageway of this fast and busy road, notwithstanding that the Local Authority consider the drainage to be have been broadly operative at the relevant time (2) state of the verges is such that a car might be pushed upwards on leaving the road out of control, landing on or over the Armco barrier.
22): prior The

Responses

1 respondent
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Authority / Fire Service
8 Nov 2016 PDF
Noted

Rotherham MBC provides detailed information about its road maintenance and inspection regimes, but does not commit to any changes as a result of the coroner's concerns. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Sirs MR JONATHAN SELLMAN (DECEASED) -V- ROTHERHAM MBC We write on behalf of the Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (Rotherham MBC) in response to Mr Dorries' (HM Senior Coroner) Regulation 28 Report dated 17 August
2016. Mr Dorries' concerns relate to the circumstances touching the death of Mr Sellman, whose vehicle left the Sheffield Parkway (4630), travelling towards Junction 33 on the morning of 28 March 2016. It is noted that Mr Dorries states at section 4 of his said report that: subject to investigation in greater detail at the Inquest, it appears on preliminary basis that Mr Sellman lost control because of standing water on the carriageway' and that he expressed the following concerns at section 5 of the said report: (1) Water appears to be pooling On the carriageway of this fast and busy road, notwithstanding that the local authority considered the drainage to have been broadly operative at the material time; (2)The state of the verge is as such that a car might be pushed upwards on leaving the road out of control, landing on or over the Armco barrier. Kennedys is trading name of Kennedys Law LLP. Kennedys Law LLP is_ limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number 0C353214). Kernedys offices ussociations and cooperations: Aucktand, Beijing, Belfast, Birmingham, Bogota, Brussels, Buenos Aires, Cambridge, Chelmsford, Copenhagen, Dubai, Dublin, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Kong, Karachi, Lima, Lisbon, London, Madrid; Manchester, Mexico Miami, MoScOw, Mumbai, New Delhi, Oslo, Paris_ Rio de Janeiro, Santiago, Sao Paulo, Shanghai, Sheffield, Singaporc, Stockholm, Sydney, Taunton and Warsaw list of members names is available for inspection at our registered office at 25 Fenchurch Avenue London ECBM SAD. Kennedys Law LLP Is authorised arid regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority: We use the word 'Partner to refer to member of Kennedys Low LLP; Dr @n employee or consultant who is lawyer with equivalent stariding and qualifications. Legali 18632929. Hong City;

Kennedys Rotherham MBC takes Mr Dorries' concerns extremely seriously and has taken number of steps since the accident to meet these concerns including the following: it has commissioned thorough and independent inspection of the A630 at the accident locus and its vicinity; it has undertaken extensive surveying of the highway drainage system at the relevant location to enable a thorough assessment of its suitability; when undertaking its regular inspections of the highway by way of monthly driven inspections, the highway inspector is now accompanied by & drainage supervisor; it has purchased a dash cam and implemented a system whereby design technician drives along the Parkway to monitor the situation during periods of heavy rain_ The above-mentioned investigations support the following conclusions: the A630 was built in the 1960s and the geometry of this highway is appropriate and adheres to relevant construction standards; the capacity of the drainage system on the approach to and at the accident locus, including gully spacing and the capacity of the pipework for the receiving carrier drains is more than adequate to drain the road satisfactorily during periods of heavy rainfall and was functioning in accordance with its capacity at the relevant time; (iii) the construction f the road itself and the drainage system does not give rise to a risk that there will be 'standing water' or 'pools of water' on the carriageway; (iv) Rotherham has long established procedures for the maintenance of the highway at the accident locus, which are in accordance with and in fact exceed National standards and which may be summarised as follows: maintenance of the eastbound and westbound carriageway is scheduled to take place three times year on two consecutive Sundays. A temporary traffic order is made to close individual lanes in order for the maintenance works to be undertaken The works commence early in the day and finish at 10.00 am to avoid traffic congestion and the Police monitor traffic on the day, especially on the M1 motorway, and may require the curtailment of the maintenance works as necessary due to traffic congestion; Legall 18632929.1 2 of

Kennedys the said maintenance works include the cleansing of gullies and, where necessary, gully connections; Rotherham undertakes regular inspections of the highway by way of monthly driven inspections by highway inspector and_ since the accident, who is now accompanied by drainage supervisor; in addition to its regimes of scheduled maintenance and inspection, Rotherham also relies upon reports from members of the public and/or the Police to report any concerns that might arise in the meantime; (vii) the evidence suggests that the two gullies adjacent to the central reservation (at the accident locus) were functioning correctly at the time of the accident; (viii) further evidence indicates that on 10 April 2016 the gully GF3 to the west of the accident locus was recorded as blocked. If it was also blocked on 28 March 2016 (which has not been established) this situation would have caused added pressure on the adjacent downstream gullies: however, this scenario would not have caused water to flow across the carriageway because the system is constructed to accommodate such 'blockages' The water would simply have travelled along to the next point of exit; (ix) it is significant to note from video taken from a Police car at 07:26 hours on the of the accident, that whilst there was clearly surface water flowing across the eastbound carriageway, as might be expected during period of heavy rain, these conditions did not cause the driver to deem it necessary to lower his speed below 84 miles per hour; the verges of the highway comprise compacted 'dirt and are no different to substantial tracts of highway across the country. It is not possible to say what (if any) role the relevant verges had in respect of Mr Sellman's accident in the absence of any information about his speed Or trajectory or the general circumstances in which he lost control of his motor car; (xi) there is no basis upon which to identify the A630 Sheffield Parkway as high risk carriageway from a road safety of view: furthermore, approximately 50,000 vehicles travel on the Parkway on a daily basis.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 29t March 2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Jonathan Edward Michael Sellman (aged The investigation has not yet concluded and the inquest has not yet been heard. The investigation was transferred to me from the Rotherham/Doncaster Coroner's jurisdiction.
Circumstances of the death
On the morning of the 28th March 2016 Mr Sellman left Sheffield on the A630 Sheffield Parkway towards junction 33 of the M1 motorway: Whilst there are no known witnesses to the event; examination of the scene etc , has suggested that the vehicle lost control to the nearside of the carriageway, going onto the Armco barrier and colliding with a lamp post immediately to the old railway sidings bridge. The vehicle then tumbled down the embankment: The incident caused fatal injuries to Mr Sellman. No other vehicles are thought to have been involved. This is, of course, a straight piece of road with the national speed limit. Subject to investigation in greater deal at the inquest; it appears on a preliminary basis that Mr Sellman lost control because of standing water on the carriageway
Action should be taken
believe your Local Authority have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2016-0395
Date of report
17 August 2016
Coroner
Peter Dorries
Coroner area
South Yorkshire (West)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 25 Oct 2016.

Sent to

Rotherham Borough Council

Source links