Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Thomas Wallace

Ref: 2016-0463 Date: 22 Dec 2016 Coroner: Jonathan Heath Area: North Yorkshire (West) 1 response identified · 1 indexed addressee View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner noted several issues with a road junction, including a restricted view of A682 traffic due to the layout and a solid wall, alongside limited and inaccurate signage. National speed limit signs were also visible before reaching the junction.

Date 22 Dec 2016
56-day deadline 16 Feb 2017 est. estimated from the report date
Responses identified 1 of 1
Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner noted several issues with a road junction, including a restricted view of A682 traffic due to the layout and a solid wall, alongside limited and inaccurate signage. National speed limit signs were also visible before reaching the junction.
View full coroner's concerns
The matters of concern raised below although not directly linked to the death are matters which I believe (1) The layout of the junction affords an extremely restricted view of traffic on the A682.

(2) The solid wall running alongside the A682, contributes to the restricted view of the traffic on the A682.

(3) The signage on the A682 regarding the junction with the lane down to Knowles cottages is very limited.

(4) There is a staggered junction sign where there appears to be a cross roads.

(5) The national speed limit signs placed immediately after the junction are visible in advance of being able to see the junction.

Responses

1 respondent

North Yorkshire County Council

Local Authority
Letter dated 13 Jan 2017 PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Planned
AI-generated response summary

North Yorkshire County Council plans to serve a notice under Section 79 of the Highways Act 1980 to compel a landowner to improve junction visibility if voluntary engagement fails. They will also investigate changes to the height of national speed limit signs, but dispute the need to replace the staggered junction sign.

View full response
Dear Mr Heath Thomas Wallace (deceased) I write in response to your Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Death, dated 22 December 2016, and following the inquest into the untimely death of Mr Thomas Wallace on 23 April 2016. We have reviewed your report, and the matters of concern that you raised regarding:
1. The layout of the junction affords an extremely restricted view of traffic on the 4682.
2. The solid wall running alongside the A682, contributes to the restricted view of traffic on the A682.
3. The signage on the 4682 regarding the junction with the lane down to Knowles Cottages is very limited.
4. There is a staggered junction sign where there appears to be a cross roads.
5. The national speed limit signs placed immediately after the junction are visible in advance of being able to see the junction. Our response to your concerns falls into two main parts: improving the visibility from the lane leading to Knowles Cottages and; the signage and road markings approaching and surrounding the junction. .../continued Mr J Heath Assistant Coroner Office of the Senior Coroner 21 Grammar School Lane Northallerton North Yorkshire DL6 1DF Business and Environmental Services I

[Page 2] ln answer to your specific concerns:
1. The layout of the junction affords an extremely restricted view of traffic on the 4682 and:
2. The solid wall running alongside the 4682, contributes to the restricted view of traffic the on 4682. A Fatal Collision Inspection was undertaken by the Traffic Engineering Team of North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC) following the death of Mr Wallace. This inspection identified that the poor visibility was a contributory factor in the collision. As a result, NYCC as Highway Authority committed to engage with the land owner with a view to holding an informal/advisory discussion with them on how to improve the access for their tenants. Subsequent to this report being completed and approved, it was discovered that while the cottages and access road are owned by a charítable trust, the surrounding Iand belongs to a private landowner. NYCC have committed to work with the landowner to improve junction visibility. Since the collision, NYCC have contacted the landowner twice, but she has so far refused to engage with NYCC. Since the inquest, and receipt of the Regulation 28 Report, NYCC have been working to consider the options for improving the visibility from the junction, if the landowner will not work with us voluntarily. As a result of these discussions it has been decided to write to the landowner one more time requesting that she work with us voluntarily, if not we plan to serve a notice under Section 79 of the Highways Act 1980, requiring the landowner to make improvements to the visibility of the junction, and this possibility will be made clear in the aforementioned letter. The costs of these works can be recovered by the landowner from the authority. These improvement works will address concerns 1 and 2 of your report.
3. The signage on the A682 regarding the junction with the lane down to Knowles is Cottages very limited. The County Council is of the opinion that the signage on approach to the junction of the 4682 and the lane to Knowles Cottages is adequate, considering the location of the junction within a 30 mph speed limit, where side roads, are not usually signed. ln response to previous concerns from the residents of Knowles Cottages extra signage and road markings have been provided in the form of the "Staggered Junction" signs (see concern 4 below), countdown markings and "SLOW" markings on approach to the 30mph limit. There are no appropriate signs specified in the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 to highlight the existence of the lane to Knowles Cottages beyond those that are already in place. We are though exploring whether some of the current signage and road markings should be reviewed on both approaches, to increase awareness and conspicuity of the junction to Knowles Cottages.
4. There is a staggered junction sign where there appears to be a cross roads. It is the view of the County Cogncil that the "Staggered Junction" warning signs are appropriate. The signs are in place to warn of the junctions with the lane to Knowles Cottages to the north of the railway bridge, and that to Mill Farm, located to the south of the bridge. National guidance allows for staggered junction signs to be used where the distance between junctions are no

[Page 3] more than 120 metres, the distance in this case is 100 metres. We do not feel that it would be appropriate to replace the signage with a crossroads warning sign, as the access opposite that to Knowles Cottages is a gate into a farmer's field, not a road open to the public. As there is no legal signage to show a crossroads and another side road in close proximity, or vice versa, it is felt that the staggered junction warning sign is the safest and best legal option'
s. The national speed limit signs placed immediately after the junction are visible in advance of being able to see the junction' We acknowledge that the national speed limit signs are visible prior to the junction coming into sight when travelling from Long Preston. The question of extending the 30mph limit further to the south has previously been considered by NYCC, following concerns from local residents. This extension does not however meet Department for Transport criteria, and would not be supported by the police. This is because there is no development south of the junction with Knowles Cottages. The experience of the County Council from other examples of speed limit extensions , such as this is that they have very little effect on motorists' speed and compliance with the limit, and if the council was to make the changes without police support, there would be little chance of robust enforcement. Nevertheless, NYCC will investigate whether any changes - such as the height of the signs - can be made to the sign assemblies, to make them less visible prior to the junction with Knowles Cottages' In summary, the County Council is doing what it can to improve junction conspicuity within the constraints laid down in national guidance, and are looking to review the adequacy of the existing signage. ln addition, we are actively pursuing all avenues, including the possibility for taking enforcement action in order to improve visibility at the Knowles Cottages junction. I will ensure that you receive updates regarding the progress of the work that the County Council has committed to in the above letter.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 25th April 2016 an investigation was commenced into the death of Thomas Wallace, aged 47. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 24th November 2016. The conclusion was accidental death and the facts were that at 1400 hours on 23rd April 2016, Thomas Wallace was riding his Motorbike on the A682 at Long Preston towards Gisburn. At this time a car pulled out of an unclassified track leading from Knowles Cottages ages into the path of Mr Wallace’s motorcycle. A collision occurred and Mr Wallace was pronounced life extinct at the scene.
Circumstances of the death
At 1400 hours on 23rd April 2016, Thomas Wallace was riding his motorcycle on the A682 at Long Preston in the direction of Gisburn. which are accessed by a lane from the A682. At this time was driving her car and was stationary at the junction with the A682, having driven down the lane from her cottage. There were no vehicles in sight as she pulled out of the junction intending to turn right. As she was midway across the road, Mr Wallace, on his motorcycle, collided with car. As a result of the collision Mr Wallace suffered serious multiple injuries and died at the scene.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2016-0463
Date of report
22 December 2016
Coroner
Jonathan Heath
Coroner area
North Yorkshire (West)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 16 Feb 2017 (estimated from the report date).

Sent to

North Yorkshire County Council Highways Authority

Source links