Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

David Sheppard

Ref: 2017-0153 Date: 8 May 2017 Coroner: Louise Hunt Area: Birmingham and Solihull Responses identified: 1 / 3 View PDF

Communication breakdowns due to poor English language skills among care staff, inadequate first aid training, poor record-keeping, and substandard post-event investigation hindered effective emergency response and learning.

Date 8 May 2017
56-day deadline 3 Jul 2017
Responses identified 1 of 3
Care Home Health related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Communication breakdowns due to poor English language skills among care staff, inadequate first aid training, poor record-keeping, and substandard post-event investigation hindered effective emergency response and learning.
View full coroner's concerns
Communication There are three areas where communication is a concern: The initial nurse who attended the deceased after the emergency call had poor English and needed to give evidence at the inquest through an interpreter: The carer who started CPR had very poor English and also gave evidence through an interpreter: The evidence heard at the inquest was that the response to this emergency was chaotic. Inability of staff to communicate with each other contributed to the chaos and poor decision making Staff failed to pass on an accurate history of what had happened to the deceased resulting in there being a poor understanding of his initial complaint namely that the deceased was pointing to his throat and was unable to communicate. These factors would indicate choking: The patients on the challenging behavioural unit are extremely vulnerable and many suffer from dementia and other conditions. Staff being unable to communicate effectively with these patients may cause harm and confusion. Record keeping: Staff failed to keep an acute and contemporaneous note of the events that occurred with timings. This made reconstruction of the event extremely difficult Training: Several of the staff who gave evidence had not received first aid training: They did not understand the signs of choking displayed by the deceased. Post event investigation. The quality of statements produced by staff immediately after the event was extremely poor. Subsequently staff had a very poor recollection of what happened which seriously hampered the inquest. Direction needs to be given to ensure that accurate and contemporaneous statements are taken after such an incident to ensure events are accurately recorded to enable the correct lessons to be learnt:

Responses

1 respondent
David Sheppard
4 Jul 2017 PDF
Noted

The Department of Health acknowledges the concerns and outlines the responsibilities of care providers and the CQC. They clarify the role of the NMC and the requirements for language testing for non-regulated workers, noting the Care Certificate covers communication. (AI summary)

View full response
Philip Dunne MP Minister of State for Health Department of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall Our reference: PFD-1085354 London SWIA 2NS reference: 115279 DAVID SHEPPARD (LHIAS) Tel: 020 7210 4850 Mrs Louise Hunt HM Senior Coroner Birmingham & Solihull Areas Coroner' s Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE Deac Louise , 4th July 2017 Thank you for your letter of 9 2017 to the Secretary of State about the death of Mr David Sheppard. I am responding as the Minister with responsibility for workforce and quality regulation at the Department of Health. Iwas very saddened to read of the circumstances surrounding Mr Sheppard s death. Please pass my condolences to his family and loved ones Ihave noted very carefully the conclusion of the inquest and the areas of concern you have detailed. Clearly, the failure to take adequate action in response to Mr Sheppard's fatal situation was unacceptable. I can appreciate how distressing these circumstances must be for Mr Sheppard '$ family: All registered providers ofhealth and social care in England are required to provide safe, effective, compassionate and high quality care and to meet the fundamental standards of quality and safety as set out in Regulations (Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated activities) Regulations 2014) www legislation gov ukluksi/2014/2936/contents/made: It is the responsibility of Boldmere Court Care Home as the registered provider to ensure there are sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent; skilled and experienced persons deployed and appropriately trained as necessary to enable them to carry out their duties. Your May

It is the responsibility of the Care Quality Commission (CQC), as the independent regulator ofhealth and adult social care in England; to monitor; inspect and regulate services to make sure meet the fundamental standards of quality and safety; You have therefore taken the correct action in addressing your Report to the CQC and Boldmere Court Care Home who will respond on the specific matters of concern you have raised, Iunderstand the provider has taken a number of measures to address concerns including, but not limited to, the provision of training with first aid, CPR and choking prioritised in the induction process; as well as documentation training sessions and the introduction of an incident reporting questionnaire. Iam aware that the CQC conducted an inspection of Boldmere Court Care Home in January 2017, resulting in a of *Good' overall with no breaches of regulation identified. At this inspection the CQC reviewed the provider'$ progress on the actions it had taken in light of this incident: am assured that as part ofits inspection programme, CQC will continue to monitor that service user' s needs are met through verbal and non-verbal communication skills at Boldmere Court The CQC will also monitor that the provider continues to meet the required standards around ensuring staff receive appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal as necessary to enable them t0 cartry out the duties are employed to perform (Regulation 18); and that systems and processes are in place to ensure compliance with the requirements around maintaining accurate; complete and contemporaneous records for people receiving care (Regulation 17). You mention in your Report that two nurses were involved in the incident: As you may be aware, nurses must register with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC); and meet professional standards to work in the UK, and be fit for practise This includes sufficient knowledge of the English language to be able to perform their roles. For registered nurses; we expect the NMC'$ registration processes and associated checks to be appropriate, robust, fit for purpose, effective and to verify that the applicant is who claim to be and that are appropriately qualified, competent and fit to practise and have the ability to speak English to the required standard; The NMC has three different registration processes UK, Europe and the rest of the world; The NMC requires all overseas applicants, defined as those who trained outside the European Economic Area (EEA), to complete the academic version of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) achieving level 7.0 across all four aspects of listening, reading, writing and speaking: they - rating being they they they

Department of Health The NMC also requires those European trained applicants who are unable to provide sufficient evidence of English language skills such as having trained or worked in an English-speaking country to complete an English Language Assessment to the required standard: Where there is concern that a nurse may not meet the professional standards required in the UK, the NMC has a duty to investigate and, where necessary, take action to safeguard the health and well-being of the public. Fitness to Practise allegations can relate to concerns over a nurse'$ ability to communicate effectively in English, in addition to matters such as clinical competence. I note your report has been shared with the NMC. I should clarify that the Department does not involved with or comment on individual fitness to practise cases There is no requirement for language testing non-regulated workers; such a8 care staff. However; social care employers are responsible for ensuring that their staff are trained and competent for the tasks are recruited to do. This includes the ability to communicate effectively. Communication is covered within the Care Certificate. However; there is no explicit reference to being proficient in the English language. The Care Certificate is an identified set of standards that health and social care workers adhere to in their daily working life. Designed with the non-regulated workforce in mind, the Care Certificate provides confidence that these workers have the same introductory skills, knowledge and behaviours to provide compassionate, safe and high quality care and support; Further information on the Care Certificate can be obtained from the Health Education England website https Ihhee nhs uklcarecertificate: I should point out that the Care Certificate also covers awareness of mental health, dementia and learning disabilities so that staff supporting people with challenging behaviours have a basic awareness of their needs. At Boldmere Court Care Home; I am advised that this is supplemented with mandatory training and hands-on training with staff and patients I hope this reply is helpful in setting out the national requirements and regulations around these areas of concern: Thank you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Sheppard's death to our attention. M< PHILIP DUNNE get they

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 15/08/2016 commenced an investigation into the death of David Sheppard who died at Good Hope Hospital on 03/08/16 aged 66. The investigation concluded at the end ofan inquest on Sth May 2017 The conclusion of the Jury at the inquest was "On 31st July 2016, inadequate action was taken to help the deceased from choking: Failure to give appropriate medical assistance in an immediate timeframe A lack of training and communication between caregivers ultimately resulted in the deceased being rushed to Good Hope Hospital where he later passed away due to a severe hypoxic brain injury-In conclusion his death was contributed to by neglect_
Circumstances of the death
The deceased suffered from vascular dementia and a previous stroke: He became a resident at Boldmere Court in July 2013.He had challenging behaviour and was cared for on the challenging behavioural unit however, he was able to verbally communicate his needs. On 31/07/16 he was given a doughnut at 23.22 and went back to his Own room_ Soon after he was found by a carer outside his room, pointing at his throat and unable to communicate verbally The carer took the deceased back into his room, leaving to find the nurse who was on another floor. During this time another carer checked on the deceased and raised the emergency alarm at 23.38. Various members of staff attended, including 2 nurses who entered the room: A nurse checked the deceased's airways which appeared clear, however the deceased still had breathing difficulties and could not communicate. The first ambulance call was placed at 23*41 stating the deceased was having difficulty breathing: Staff brought crash mats into the deceased' $ room. In this period all members of staff who initially attended the alarm call, continually left and re-entered the room until 23*48 when CPR commenced by a carer; Soon after starting CPR a piece of doughnut came out of the deceased' $ mouth: There were points this time where the deceased was left alone: At 23*49 a second ambulance call was placed, stating the deceased was now in cardiac arrest and not breathing: The ambulance arrived 6 minutes later. When the paramedics arrived there was no CPR in progress and no airway assisting the deceased' s breathing: The paramedics noted the deceased had agonal breathing They took over care and resuscitated the deceased several times_ The deceased was then taken to hospital where he arrived with a pulse and a Glasgow coma score of three_ The deceased was treated in A&E where food particles were found in the airway: The deceased was resuscitated and taken to ITU where he was found to have suffered a severe Hypoxic Brain Injury as a result of the cardiac arrest which was caused by choking on a doughnut; Following this, 3 decision was made to withdraw treatment and let nature take its course: deceased later died at Good Hope Hospital on the 3rd August 2016_ Following information from the Deceased's treating clinicians the medical cause of death was during The determined to be: 1a. HYPOXIC BRAIN INJURY 1b. CARDIAC ARREST 1c. CHOKING
2. VASCULAR DEMENTIA, HYPERTENSION
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2017-0153
Date of report
8 May 2017
Coroner
Louise Hunt
Coroner area
Birmingham and Solihull

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 3
2 responses not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Jul 2017.

Sent to

Boldmere Court Care Home
Care Quality Commission
Department of Health and Social Care

Source links