Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Dominic White

Ref: 2017-0177 Date: 24 May 2017 Coroner: ME Hassell Area: London Inner (North) Responses identified: 1 / 3 View PDF

A robust protocol is lacking to ensure all personnel are aware of patient observation levels. An approved mental health professional showed a lack of recognition regarding the absconding risk when allowing a detained patient leave.

Date 24 May 2017
56-day deadline 29 Sep 2017 est.
Responses identified 1 of 3
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A robust protocol is lacking to ensure all personnel are aware of patient observation levels. An approved mental health professional showed a lack of recognition regarding the absconding risk when allowing a detained patient leave.
View full coroner's concerns
Many issues were raised at inquest, but I was given information that the majority of these had been explored in advance of the hearing, and new ways of working had been found. The MATTERS OF CONCERN that remain, are as follows.

1. I heard that, following Mr White’s death, the level of (mental health) observations of a patient at the Whittington Hospital Emergency Unit is now clearly documented.

However, I am not sure that there is yet a robust protocol in place to ensure that all relevant personnel (Whittington EU doctors, nurses and security officers; also visiting independent s12 doctors, BEH and C&I staff) are aware of the level. My concern arises because sometimes, when anyone can look at a record, that nobody actually does.

2. The C&I approved mental health professional (AMHP) who gave Mr White permission to leave the hospital to go to McDonald’s, after the decision had been made to detain him under section 2 of the Mental Health Act, acknowledged that she should have discussed this first with a colleague.

However, she remained of the view at inquest that the decision itself had been the right one. Proof of this, she explained, was the fact that Mr White did return to the hospital from this visit.

Allowing leave in these circumstances was a very unusual step I am concerned at the lack of recognition, even so long after the event, that allowing a person to leave the hospital in these circumstances:

- was not necessarily the right one simply because the patient returned on this occasion (he left again within half an hour and never returned); and
- had the potential to lull others into a false sense of security about his risk of absconding.

The trust’s root cause analysis action plan merely describes the need to have legally authorised permission to leave, without addressing any question of how to shape clinical decision making.

Responses

1 respondent
Whittington Hospital NHS2 Trust NHS / Health Body
24 Jul 2017 PDF
Action Taken

Whittington Health NHS Trust, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, and Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust have created a joint protocol to improve mental health observations in the Emergency Department, including daily safety huddles and escalation procedures. A learning event was held, and an independent review of serious incidents relating to mental health has been commissioned. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Coroner Hassell

Prevention of future deaths report – Dominic Michael White

We write further to your prevention of future death report dated 24 May 2017. Following the inquest, you recorded two matters which gave you cause for concern with regards the care provided to Dominic White.

The first matter (level of mental health observations) spans Whittington Health NHS Trust, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, and Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust. This response, therefore, is a joint response from all three organisations addressing the concerns you have raised.

The second matter concerns the decision making of the Approved Mental Health Professional. The AMHP is employed by the London Borough of Islington. When AMHPs are carrying out their duties, they act on behalf of the Local Authority. The London Borough of Islington will therefore provide you with a separate response to this issue.

Mental health observations

During the inquest you heard that following Mr White’s death, the level of mental health observations of a patient at the Whittington Hospital Emergency Department is clearly documented. However, you are not sure whether there is yet a robust protocol in place to ensure that all relevant personnel (Whittington ED doctors, nurses and security officers; and visiting independent s12 doctors, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey staff and Camden & Islington staff) are aware of the agreed level of observation.

You have recorded your concern that sometimes, when anyone can look at a record, nobody actually does.

Whittington Health Magdala Avenue London N19 5NF

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust Orchard House St Ann’s Hospital St Ann’s Road, London N15 3TH Camden & Islington NHS FT St Pancras Way London NW1 OPE Chief.executive@candi.nhs.uk 1

Protocol for implementing observation levels for mental health patients

We set out below our agreed approach for ensuring that all relevant personnel are aware of a mental health patient’s level of observation. In order to address both concerns identified in the PFD, the Whittington and Camden & Islington have reviewed their mental health policies. These are being updated to ensure the roles and responsibilities are explicit and will also include case studies to assist in decision making. This will be included in Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust’s Mental Health Liaison Operational Policy and the Whittington Health NHS policy for mental health patients in the Emergency Department which is currently being updated.

1. Camden and Islington Foundation Trust’s mental health liaison team is responsible for recommending what the level of observations should be and for documenting this in the mental health care plan;

2. The mental health liaison team is responsible for informing the nurse in charge of Whittington Hospital’s ED and the named nurse looking after the patient in the ED what the recommended level of observation is;

3. The nurse in charge of ED and the mental health liaison team are jointly responsible for ensuring that security staff and any other relevant Whittington ED staff are fully aware of the required observation level;

4. Whittington Hospital’s ED staff are responsible for ensuring that the patient is observed in line with the observation level as documented in the mental health care plan;

5. Visiting AHMPs and section 12 doctors must introduce themselves to the nurse in charge of ED and the named nurse responsible for the patient and request a clinical handover (Including the current observation level) and to view the mental health care plan. Whittington Health ED Nurse in Charge and named nurse are responsible for facilitating this.

6. As part of improving communication between organisations signage has been introduced in Whittington ED, which is prominently placed around the nurses’ station, to ensure that visiting doctors and AHMPs are aware of this process and that the name of the patient’s allocated nurse and any 1:1 or ‘special’ staff member is visible outside the patient’s cubicle (see images).

7. To support patients in ED staffing levels have been increased to allow for an additional ED Assistant on each shift to provide support and 1:1 for mental health patients if required. All ED Assistants have been provided with additional training in mental health including communication skills, how to manage a difficult situation and Level 3 Breakaway training.

8. To ensure that the level of observations is being complied with and that the clinical decision making regarding Mental Health patients is robust Senior Whittington ED staff members (nurse in charge, site team, ED registrar or consultant) conduct a situation report 5 times per day in which the status of the department including 2

3 length of stay of mental health patients and risk assessment is discussed, this is followed by a review in which plans for patients are confirmed and quality of care is checked. In addition to the actions taken as part of the response to the prevention of future deaths report the following actions have also been undertaken:
9. A learning event based around this incident took place on the 15th June 2017 with 43 attendees from all three organisations. Discussions were held around joint working and staff members wrote personal pledges which were shared with the family. As a result of this, the Islington AHMP team has been invited to attend Whittington ED for a training session with ED staff so both teams can learn from each other.
10. The Emergency Care Improvement Programme has conducted a ‘deep dive’ into mental health care of patients presenting with mental health concerns at Whittington Health and in the local area. The results of this review will enable development of a plan for improvements in this area and how to support the trust(s) to achieve these improvements
11. In addition as part of the Emergency Care Improvement Programme a joint audit of a number of patients presenting to ED with mental health issues will be undertaken. Further improvements will be made in line with recommendations resulting from the deep dive.
12. Whittington Health has commissioned an independent review of the cluster of serious incidents relating to mental health, which will commence in July 2017. We hope that our joint protocol as set out above provides assurance as to how seriously we are taking the concerns you raised, and our ongoing determination, and commitment to ensure that we keep all our patients safe.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 14 November 2016, one of my assistant coroners, William Dolman, commenced an investigation into the death of Dominic White aged 27 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 May 2017. The jury made a narrative determination, a copy of which I attach.
Circumstances of the death
Dominic White had diagnoses of bipolar affective disorder and psychosis, but had been well for some time. However, in the few days before his death he very rapidly deteriorated.

His parents took him to the emergency unit at the Whittington Hospital on Monday, 7 November; they called the crisis team at Canning Crescent for help on Tuesday, 8 November; and they returned to hospital with him via ambulance on Wednesday, 9 November.

He spent most of 9 November in the emergency unit and was assessed as requiring detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act, but before being conveyed to a mental health hospital with space for him, he walked out of the hospital emergency unit where he had been assessed.

He was found the following day at an electricity substation, with injuries consistent with a fall from height. There was no evidence that any other person was involved in his death, but he lacked the necessary insight or intent to allow a determination of suicide to be a safe one.
Copies sent to
Care Quality Commission for England, approved mental health professional

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2017-0177
Date of report
24 May 2017
Coroner
ME Hassell
Coroner area
London Inner (North)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 3
2 responses not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 29 Sep 2017 (estimated).

Sent to

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Camden and Islington NHS Trust
Whittington Health NHS Trust

Source links