Sandwell General Hospital
NHS / Health Body
Disputed
The hospital disputes that Mrs. Brady was oversupplied with medication, stating that medications were generally supplied for short durations and the dispensed Aspirin was within agreed limits. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mrs Lees,
RE: Regulation 28 Report – Sarah Brady
I am in receipt of your Regulation 28 Report following the Inquest and your ruling on 5 May 2021, in respect of the late Mrs Sarah Brady.
During the collation of information for the inquest, it was recognised that the frequent attendance and associated discharge processes, including provision of medication, may highlight that there might be an oversupply to an already vulnerable person. I am sorry we missed the opportunity to provide you with this evidence. This was, in fact, not the case.
You will see from the attached list that, apart from the Aspirin, dispensed on 29 July 2020, medications were supplied for 7 days, 5 days or were not dispensed at all, instead giving back her own medications. The Aspirin was a new medication so was supplied to the level agreed with the CCG and in total only provided 2.1g, where the maximum daily dose for pain control is 4g.
I understand from those present at the inquest hearing, that Mrs Brady was known to stock pile medications, clearly both we and her GP were managing the complexity of providing medications to treat her ailments, at the same time as trying not to over provide medicines to a clearly vulnerable person.
Given the information we provided at the Inquest and the attached evidence, I believe we were not over supplying Mrs Brady.
My colleague, , Deputy Director of Governance, would be best placed to provide advice or further details on our actions. She can be contacted on or through
RE: Regulation 28 Report – Sarah Brady
I am in receipt of your Regulation 28 Report following the Inquest and your ruling on 5 May 2021, in respect of the late Mrs Sarah Brady.
During the collation of information for the inquest, it was recognised that the frequent attendance and associated discharge processes, including provision of medication, may highlight that there might be an oversupply to an already vulnerable person. I am sorry we missed the opportunity to provide you with this evidence. This was, in fact, not the case.
You will see from the attached list that, apart from the Aspirin, dispensed on 29 July 2020, medications were supplied for 7 days, 5 days or were not dispensed at all, instead giving back her own medications. The Aspirin was a new medication so was supplied to the level agreed with the CCG and in total only provided 2.1g, where the maximum daily dose for pain control is 4g.
I understand from those present at the inquest hearing, that Mrs Brady was known to stock pile medications, clearly both we and her GP were managing the complexity of providing medications to treat her ailments, at the same time as trying not to over provide medicines to a clearly vulnerable person.
Given the information we provided at the Inquest and the attached evidence, I believe we were not over supplying Mrs Brady.
My colleague, , Deputy Director of Governance, would be best placed to provide advice or further details on our actions. She can be contacted on or through