Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Roy Walklet
Ref: 2023-0240
Date: 15 May 2023
Coroner: Duncan Ritchie
Area: Stoke on Trent and North Staffordshire
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Hospital policy prevented a crucial gastroscopy until a ward bed was available. A consultant was also unaware of patient allocation because the patient remained in A&E, delaying critical review.
Date
15 May 2023
56-day deadline
12 Sep 2023 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Hospital policy prevented a crucial gastroscopy until a ward bed was available. A consultant was also unaware of patient allocation because the patient remained in A&E, delaying critical review.
View full coroner's concerns
On 7th April 2022 the deceased Mr Walklet attended the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Stoke University Hospital suffering from a bleeding duodenal ulcer. A consultant gastroenterologist decided that a gastroscopy should be undertaken that same day to identify and treat the cause of the bleeding. The gastroenterologist felt that it was important for the gastroscopy to be undertaken without delay because there was potential for Mr Walklet to suffer another big bleed, which could be fatal. No gastroscopy took place on 7th April 2022. During the inquest I was told that this was because Mr Walklet had not been allocated a bed in the hospital and a gastroscopy would not take place until a bed had been allocated to him because a patient cannot be returned to the Accident and Emergency Department from the gastroscopy department. A gastroscopy eventually took place on 8th April 2022. Mr Walklet later suffered further bleeding from the duodenal ulcer which resulted in his death. The delay in undertaking the gastroscopy was not causative of Mr Walklet’s death, but I was told that systems and procedures in the Hospital remain as they were at the time of Mr Walklet’s death – i.e. that a stable patient with a gastric bleed who was being cared for in the Accident and Emergency Department could not have a gastroscopy until a bed for them became available in the Hospital. I was further told during the inquest that Mr Walklet was allocated a bed in the Hospital either late on 7th April 2022 or early on 8th April 2022 and that his care was allocated to a consultant gastroenterologist . should have seen Mr Walklet during his morning ward round but did not do so. told me that he was not aware that Mr Walklet had been allocated to his list of patients. Mr Walklet’s family believe that this error occurred because, whilst Mr Walklet had been allocated a bed on the ward, he actually remained in the Accident and Emergency department. As a result, Mr Walklet’s condition and care was not reviewed by the consultant gastroenterologist until later that day. At the time Mr Walklet was still suffering from a bleeding duodenal ulcer from which he was to die later the same day.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 20 April 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Roy WALKLET aged 62. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 03 April 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Roy Walklet died on 9th April 2022 at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent of multiorgan failure caused by a massive gastroduodenal haemorrhage which was contributed to by the taking of ibuprofen. Mr Walklet had attended hospital on 12th March 2022 complaining of abdominal pain. Gallstones were identified and these were assumed to be the cause of the abdominal pain. An endoscopy test which could have been administered to check for an ulcer was not carried out at that stage. Mr Walklet was readmitted to hospital on 7th April 2022 suffering from a bleeding duodenal ulcer. Despite attempts to stem the bleeding he suffered multiple large bleeds which caused his death.
Circumstances of the death
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) On 7th April 2022 the deceased Mr Walklet attended the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Stoke University Hospital suffering from a bleeding duodenal ulcer. A consultant gastroenterologist decided that a gastroscopy should be undertaken that same day to identify and treat the cause of the bleeding. The gastroenterologist felt that it was important for the gastroscopy to be undertaken without delay because there was potential for Mr Walklet to suffer another big bleed, which could be fatal. No gastroscopy took place on 7th April 2022. During the inquest I was told that this was because Mr Walklet had not been allocated a bed in the hospital and a gastroscopy would not take place until a bed had been allocated to him because a patient cannot be returned to the Accident and Emergency Department from the gastroscopy department. A gastroscopy eventually took place on 8th April 2022. Mr Walklet later suffered further bleeding from the duodenal ulcer which resulted in his death. The delay in undertaking the gastroscopy was not causative of Mr Walklet’s death, but I was told that systems and procedures in the Hospital remain as they were at the time of Mr Walklet’s death – i.e. that a stable patient with a gastric bleed who was being cared for in the Accident and Emergency Department could not have a gastroscopy until a bed for them became available in the Hospital. I was further told during the inquest that Mr Walklet was allocated a bed in the Hospital either late on 7th April 2022 or early on 8th April 2022 and that his care was allocated to a consultant gastroenterologist . should have seen Mr Walklet during his morning ward round but did not do so. told me that he was not aware that Mr Walklet had been allocated to his list of patients. Mr Walklet’s family believe that this error occurred because, whilst Mr Walklet had been allocated a bed on the ward, he actually remained in the Accident and Emergency department. As a result, Mr Walklet’s condition and care was not reviewed by the consultant gastroenterologist until later that day. At the time Mr Walklet was still suffering from a bleeding duodenal ulcer from which he was to die later the same day.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Needs-based staffing with acuity measures
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Integrated workforce plans
Fuller Inquiry
Ambulance data on conveying deceased
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Effective Communication and Reporting
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Collaborative Delivery
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Staffing Guidance
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Resolve paramedic-driver shortage in mass casualties
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ensure Airwave Tactical Advisors availability
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Review NWAS Tactical Advisor rostering coverage
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Review HART mobilisation policies
Report details
- Reference
- 2023-0240
- Date of report
- 15 May 2023
- Coroner
- Duncan Ritchie
- Coroner area
- Stoke on Trent and North Staffordshire
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 12 Sep 2023 (estimated).
Sent to
- Royal Stoke University Hospital