Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Kyra Aslam

Ref: 2023-0498 Date: 5 Dec 2023 Coroner: Abigail Combes Area: South Yorkshire (Western) Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

A culture exists where medics may disregard parents' or nurses' views, and junior doctors are not adequately educated when consultants override their decisions, hindering learning.

Date 5 Dec 2023
56-day deadline 30 Jan 2024
Responses identified 1 of 1
Child Death (from 2015) Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A culture exists where medics may disregard parents' or nurses' views, and junior doctors are not adequately educated when consultants override their decisions, hindering learning.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Whether there is a culture which prevents medics from taking account of the views of parents or nursing staff when considering the overall presentation of patients
2. Where a junior doctor is over ruled by a Consultant, is that learning adequately explained to that junior doctor to learn for next time?

Responses

1 respondent
Sheffield Childrens NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
29 Jan 2024 PDF
Action Taken

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust has implemented new processes to ensure Care Groups are fully sighted on complaints, implemented 'Safety Wednesday' led by the Medical Director and Chief Nurse, and refreshed Freedom to Speak Up training. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Combes,

Kyra Aslam (Greaves) Regulation 28

Further to the inquest of Kyra Ali Aslam which concluded on 6 July 2023. I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths issued on 5 December 2023 to Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust. Under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 you requested the Trust to consider your matters for concern and take action to prevent future deaths.

Kyra sadly died on 13 August 2022 at Sheffield Children’s Hospital following a planned procedure to reverse a stoma.

I would like to assure you that the Trust takes the findings and the concerns very seriously and provides the following response to the concerns raised:

1. Whether there is a culture which prevents medics from taking account of the views of parents or nursing staff when considering the overall presentation of patients.

The Trust has recognised that the views of parents and nursing staff have not always been listened to, through feedback we triangulate from inquests, serious incidents and complaints. As a result of this, we have undertaken a significant amount of work to consider and improve areas within our culture and the processes that underpin our ways of working. This includes:

• Implementing new processes to ensure the clinical Care Groups are fully sighted on all complaints and Freedom to Speak Up themes including ones where families or colleagues feel unheard so that they can discuss and learn from these within their internal forums.
• Implementation of ‘Safety Wednesday’ led by the Medical Director and Chief Nurse to review all incidents and complaints through the week. Areas of concern are escalated to Patient Safety Incident Triage Panel for further consideration and fed into the weekly Executive Team meeting on a Thursday to enable timely action. Western Bank Sheffield S10 2TH

The learning from this process has already been rich and has specifically enabled me as Chief Executive (CEO) to speak to families before discharge, if appropriate.
• A new monthly Safety, Quality, Risk and Learning Committee provides a forum for organisation wide learning.
• Funding new Trust wide roles including Quality Matron; Patient Experience Leads and a sepsis Lead Nurse.
• Refresh of our Care Experience Group including stronger attendance, feedback and coproduction of action from The Trust’s Youth Forum and Healthwatch.
• Implementing the new national Patient Safety Incident Response Framework with significant training and appointment of new Learning Response Learning Leads.
• Roll out of human factors training across the Trust.
• Thorough review of bereavement care following themes identified from incidents and complaints with input from families and the development of future proposals.
• Embedding the Trusts ‘In it Together’ culture framework within our People Plan and supporting this with leadership events and line management training.
• Scheduled Consultant engagement meetings for 2024, where feedback from specific learning can be shared with the Consultant body in the Trust.
• Development of the Team Leader role for doctors with a refreshed job role and review of time allocated for the role.
• Invitation of external groups to talk to Executive Team and Trust Board for example the Sheffield parent / carer forum came to present feedback from their engagement work Implementation of Patient and Carer Escalation

. Parent and Carer Escalation (PaCE)

The Trust has implemented a new process to enable parents and carers to escalate concerns about their child’s clinical condition if they feel they are not being listened to. This new process is called PaCE (Parent and Carer Escalation). It is acknowledged by Sheffield Children’s NHS FT that failure to recognise and treat patients whose condition is deteriorating is a cause of significant harm in healthcare environments. One resource in the early detection of deterioration is the contribution that patients and carers can make.

Understanding parental concern as an indicator of clinical deterioration and empowering them to speak up when they are worried is key in the context of improving care quality and safety particularly in terms of preventing avoidable harm in children. PaCE is a four-step process to encourage the concerned parent/ carer to initially speak with the nurse or doctor. If they are still worried they ask for the nurse in charge of the ward. If concerns continue they can ask to speak to the ward manager or the site manager and if they are still concerned following all these conversations they can call the number displayed on the poster to speak to the Senior Nurse on Call.

Posters are prominent in all inpatient areas. The new process was initially trialled on two wards. Following successful pilots this has been rolled out to all in-patient areas on the hospital site across the Trust from 3 November 2023. To date one call has been made to the Senior Nurse on Call and we will continue to promote and monitor use to ensure all patients and carers feel able to use this if needed. Further work we want to develop is around cultural competency of colleagues and ensuring any processes we have are inclusive and accessible.

The Trust has processes and policies in place for escalation by nurses should they feel that their concerns are not being heard, these policies are being updated and will be supported by training. The new Quality Matron post will play a significant part in enabling this culture change at ward level. All clinical colleagues also have access to the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian who will take concerns and raise these directly with the Executive Team.

The Trust is committed to developing our leaders and teams so that everyone feels safe, are able to team up and to keep learning. Our Lead with Care framework supports this cultural approach and is something I personally champion as CEO. We have been very open within the Trust about our need to increase listening to our families and why we have put actions in place. As CEO I have reported back to our Trust Board on themes we are hearing and the actions in place. Whilst we have some areas of outstanding practice already, we are determined in our aim to have consistency across the Trust. We will be working hard to embed these actions to create the culture change everywhere for the safety and experience of all patients and families.

2. Where a junior doctor is overruled by a Consultant, is that learning adequately explained to that junior doctor to learn for next time?

We believe that Sheffield Children’s is a positive learning environment and this is evidenced in many areas by the GMC national trainee survey and by positive HEE quality assurance visits. We have however submitted an educational action plan to HEE to address areas where training is not at the level we expect, and our Director of Postgraduate Medical Education continues to review the quality and develop learning across all posts.

We have invested in additional time for speciality clinical tutor posts which support the development of education locally for doctors in training and act as a local support for trainees to discuss their training and training needs. Any trainee placed at Sheffield Children’s has a personal clinical supervisor assigned to them, their role is to provide learning through case-based discussions and review of their experiences (and address unmet learning needs or concerns).

As a Trust we have introduced a new way for consultants to evidence their upskilling as a Clinical and Educational Supervisor. This is now linked to their appraisal process within their Scope of Work and gives very clear suggestions on how to meet the seven domains required by the GMC. We believe that this will maintain high standards amongst our trainers, increase their accountability and ensure they receive regular training to improve their approach to teaching and give them confidence to challenge colleagues who are not meeting the same standards. Acute medicine can at times require fast decision making by the most senior colleague present which can be appropriate in emergency situations, however embedding improved supervision training for all supervisors will work towards ensuring that all clinical contacts are viewed as learning opportunities.

Additionally, trainees have access to the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian and the Guardian of Safe Working. Trainees are signposted to them as part of the induction process. The confidentiality of those speaking up is respected, in line with the Freedom to Speak Up Principles. Issues raised are brought to the attention of the Executive Medical Director/Deputy Medical Director who review the issues raised and if appropriate discuss with the individual(s). We also have a very active junior doctor forum which encourages trainees to share concerns that they have about training posts within the Trust.

The continued work we are doing with our Quality Strategy, known as the Quality Promise, which has just been launched across the Trust, will assist in embedding our culture to provide safe, kind and outstanding care to everyone. In implementing human factors, engagement with leaders and everyone across the Trust highlighting the importance of listening to parents/ carers and other colleagues across the Trust, along with the learning culture that is being implemented through PSIRF (Patient Safety Incident Response Framework).

The Trust’s ‘In this Together’ culture and behaviour framework, Lead with Care approach and the Education and Learning Strategy that have been rolled out across the Trust will ensure that our culture develops and that learning is embedded across all areas including surgery.

As the CEO of Sheffield Children’s the culture of our Trust is of huge importance to me. I have personally triangulated and fed back themes that have been raised and identified to our Board and I am ensuring that we continue to develop and embed our culture through further projects including our bereavement care and sepsis work.

I trust that this provides adequate assurance on the matters of concern. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require anything further.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 27 October 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kyra Ali Aslam born on 21 March 2022. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 July 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was:-

Kyra Ali Aslam was admitted to Sheffield Children's Hospital on 11 August 2022 for a planned procedure to reverse a stoma which had been created in March 2022. Kyra did not recover from the surgical intervention deteriorating relatively rapidly over the course of 2 days. She died at Sheffield Children's Hospital on 13 August 2022.

The medical cause of death was:

1a: Faecal peritonitis, bowel infarction and sepsis 1b: Leaking of anastomosis 1c: Closure of colostomy
1. The consent process for Kyra's planned surgery in August 2021 did not amount to fully informed consent on the part of Kyra's parents. It is clear that a decision had been made about the course of action to be pursued and this was put to the parents without description of the risks. The option to delay the surgery until after Kyra was 12 months old which was suggested as a possible consideration with the SI report, was not in accordance with the clinical view of the consultant responsible for Kyra's care. Having heard evidence from both Kyra's mother that she was informed this was a much more straight forward surgery than the original surgery which Kyra had and the evidence of the consultant that he could not recall exactly what was discussed with Kyra's family but he would not have offered them clinically unsuitable options (ie waiting until after Kyra was 1 year old) The risks of the procedure were not adequately explained to Kyra's parents at the time of the procedure by the consultant. The consent for the procedure was in effect done twice, there was no evidence either way of what risks were described to Kyra's family by the anaesthetic consultant who also sought consent for the procedure.
2. Notwithstanding my finding above, it is clear that it would never have been a clinical option open to Kyra's family to simply wait until after Kyra was older than 12 months for the procedure. That does not negate the fact that informed consent requires adequate explanation of the risks involved in the procedure being undertaken (including in this case the 1-2% risk of anastomosis). On the balance of probabilities that the finding that fully informed consent was not provided by Kyra's family on the basis of the evidence from Kyra's mother that the impression she was left with was that this was a much less risky procedure this does not change the evidence of the consultant that this surgery was a necessary surgery and it was the only clinically suitable option for Kyra. Therefore even in the context of full disclosure of the data of all of the risks, on the balance of probabilities the surgery would have proceeded and therefore the outcome for Kyra would have been the same.

3. On the basis of the evidence available it was not evident to the consultant or his colleagues, during the procedure, that there was any interruption to the blood supply to Kyra or that there was any issue with the suturing and sealing of the bowel. It was not obvious to the consultant or his colleagues that there was likely to be future issues with the blood supply to the bowel or anastomosis.

4. Kyra was unwell after the surgery and her mother was identifying that she was not behaving either how she normally would or how she had after her earlier surgery which Kyra's mother had been led to believe was a much more significant surgery. Kyra mother's concerns were explained by the medical team as matters which were normal within the context of pain, anaesthetic response and surgery. On the balance of probabilities I find that insufficient weight was placed on Kyra's mothers concerns. These ought to have been more clearly explored with her to understand whether there was anything in 'mother's intuition' that ought to lead medics to consider alternative causes for Kyra's presentation. However, in the circumstances the explanations preferred by the medical teams were within the context of reasonable medical opinion and therefore I am satisfied that on 11 August 2021 the insufficient weight placed on Kyra's mother's observations did not make a difference to the outcome for Kyra.

5. On 12 August 2021 Kyra began vomiting. This was a concern for the nursing staff, along with the temperature and the fact that her heart rate was elevated. It was on the 12 August 2021 that I heard evidence the nursing staff were thinking Kyra may have sepsis. Kyra was prescribed antibiotics and was given IV fluid to try and support her.

6. The nursing staff had significant concerns about Kyra and raised those concerns with medical staff as frequently as they felt able to do. I am satisfied on the basis of the evidence which I have heard, that the nursing staff supporting Kyra raised the concerns as soon as they were able to do so and as regularly as required to safeguard Kyra.

7. It is apparent that anastomosis within 48 hours of the procedure is a rare condition. The result of that is that it was not something which was high on the list of differential diagnosis the medics were considering and instead the medics formed the view that ileus was the most likely cause of the deterioration.

8. This was a possible diagnosis that all of the medics were working towards and that none of the medics considered that escalation to intensive care was required. I also heard evidence from the Consultant that even if he had been considering sepsis he would not have escalated care to intensive care as Kyra's management was suitable for ward level management.

9. On the balance of probabilities, that insufficient weight was placed on the nursing concerns about Kyra. The nursing staff were the best placed to identify the overall holistic view of Kyra's condition and they had significant concerns about her deterioration.

10. The medics appeared to place little weight on the observations and concerns instead placing significant weight on their own observations and the lack of expected signs of anastomosis and/or peritonitis.

11. That said, the diagnosis which the medics were considering the most likely was within the range of possible reasonable diagnosis which applied to Kyra's presentation. On the balance of probabilities that the medics had not ruled out sepsis or other conditions for Kyra but that they incorrectly worked on the basis of what they believed the most likely diagnosis. The findings cannot be made with the benefit of hindsight, clearly their diagnosis was the wrong one and this was apparent during the surgery on the 13 August 2021. However the working diagnosis was within the spectrum of reasonable possible diagnosis and the treatment the medics provided was appropriate for that diagnosis.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2023-0498
Date of report
5 December 2023
Coroner
Abigail Combes
Coroner area
South Yorkshire (Western)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 30 Jan 2024.

Sent to

Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust

Source links