Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Kaine Fletcher

Ref: 2025-0383 Date: 25 Jul 2025 Coroner: Alexandra Pountney Area: Nottinghamshire Responses identified: 3 / 9 View PDF

Concerns exist about emergency services' reliance on problematic terms like 'ABD', criticized for their potential to perpetuate racial bias and discrimination, despite rejection by psychiatric bodies.

Date 25 Jul 2025
56-day deadline 19 Sep 2025
Responses identified 3 of 9
Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) Mental Health related deaths Police related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Concerns exist about emergency services' reliance on problematic terms like 'ABD', criticized for their potential to perpetuate racial bias and discrimination, despite rejection by psychiatric bodies.
View full coroner's concerns
This PFD should be read in conjunction with the PFD that I issued mid-inquest, dated 17 July 2025.
1. Lack of joint agency policy/cross-sector working on Acute Behavioural Disorder/Disturbance In September 2022, the Royal College of Psychiatrists issued a position statement on Acute Behavioural Disturbance and Excited Delirium. The RCP recommended that:









A cross-sector working group should be convened to develop an interim consensus on ‘ABD’, with active involvement of patients and carers, to agree terminology, key principles for professional guidance, and priorities for further research. This group should include representatives from police, custodial, ambulance, emergency medicine, mental health, and the judicial and coronial system. Support from relevant government departments would help ensure consistency across services. Further research should be urgently commissioned, including detailed investigation into how racial bias plays into the application of terminology such as ‘ABD’. Members of the cross-sector working group should collaborate on the development and delivery of training materials for staff working across public services All services should seek to improve standardised collection of disaggregated data on presentations and outcomes, and to conduct regular multi-disciplinary reviews to support high-quality research on this topic.

I have heard evidence that in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire, no such cross-sector working is in place or joint agency policy is in place. I have also heard that there is no knowledge of such cross-sector working or joint agency policy in place within the East Midlands generally, or nationally. The consequence of this is that there is no joined up thinking, procedure or policy, between front-line services who are regularly dealing with cases of ABD. That lack of collaborative working between services gives rise to a risk of future death for persons who develop ABD both in the community or in custody. People at risk of developing ABD often also fall into categories of vulnerability, such as suffering with a mental health disorder or using illicit substances. To my mind, this increases the risk of future death in the absence of any collaboration. I am concerned that this appears to be a national issue.
2. Lack of agreed joint agency policy between EMAS and the police on s.136 MHA 1983 detentions I issued a PFD on 17 July 2025, part way through the final inquest hearing, to raise my concern over the apparent confusion with both the police and EMAS as to the applicable joint agency policy dealing with s.136 MHA 1983 detention and conveyance. Since that PFD was issued, the evidence has developed and the position at the end of the inquest was as follows:


The police confirmed that the document titled “Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Multi-Agency Policy & Procedure Review Group Memorandum of Understanding: Joint Agency, sections 135 and 136 Mental Health Act 1983 Procedures” has been ratified within their organisation and continues to remain the relevant joint-agency policy for s.136 detention and conveyance. This policy has been implemented for the police since its inception.



EMAS cannot confirm whether the above policy has been ratified in its current version within the organisation. They have confirmed that an employee at EMAS signed off on the 2021 version, but that this information was never disseminated within the organisation because the finalised version of the policy remained within that employee’s email inbox. The consequence appears to be that EMAS has never implemented this policy, rather they have been working to an internal policy for Mental Health Conveyance that contains different working standards.

Acknowledging that there is no confusion for the police as to the relevant policy, and that they do consider that it has been implemented, I remain concerned. My concerns can now properly be formulated as follows:


There is no joined up thinking between agencies on the local policy for s.136 MHA 1983 detention and conveyance. For a policy to be effective, all purported parties to that policy need to know it applies to them.



Internal disorganisation within EMAS has culminated in a situation where, even after a period of investigation between 17 July – 25 July, they are unable to tell the Court which, if any, joint agency policy applies to them. They are unable to tell the Court whether they are still part of the relevant working group. EMAS have allowed a situation to perpetuate in which they appear, on the face of the policy documents, to be party to an agreement (which includes service level agreements for conveyance) when they simply do not know if this is correct. The upshot of this is that other agencies may be placing reliance on the conveyance terms within the policy when they are dealing with s.136 detention.

My concerns are supported by the guidance available at ss. 16.30 – 16.35 of the Mental Health Code of Practice, which highlights the importance of local policy for s.136 detention. It does not appear that the is compliance with this guidance, published by the Department of Health. The lack of joined up thinking between agencies locally gives rise to a risk of future death for persons detained under s.136 MHA 1983.
3. Police use of an ambulance as the mode of conveyance for s.136 detainees I heard evidence that the correct mode of conveyance for persons detained under s.136 MHA 1983 is an ambulance, save in exceptional circumstances (e.g. where the detained person’s behaviour means it would be inappropriate, or where the wait for an ambulance would exceed 30 minutes). I also heard evidence, that in the last 12 months an ambulance was called by the police in only 50% of s.136 detentions. Of that 50% in which an ambulance was called, an ambulance only attended on 50% of occasions (so 25% of the total detentions). Of the nine police officers that gave evidence to me in this inquest on s.136 matters, none of them knew about the police policy on calling an ambulance to convey a s.136 detainee.

Two of the officers knew, anecdotally, that an ambulance was the preferred method of conveyance, but their evidence was that it was common for an ambulance to take well over 30 minutes or not turn up at all. I am concerned that:


There is a training issue within the police in relation to s.136 detentions and the correct mode of conveyance. Either officers do not know that they should call an ambulance, or they are ignoring their training/the instructions that they are given. This is born out in the statistics above.



There is a response issue on the part of EMAS. This may, in part, be explained by the policy/service level agreement confusion within EMAS.

4. Police training on s.136 MHA 1983 detention and mental health I heard evidence that there is no national training for police officers on the correct wording to communicate a decision and the reasons for a s.136 detention to the detainee. Further, that there is no specific training in relation to persons who are struggling with their mental health and who may be under the influence of illicit substances. I am concerned that training in the area of mental health generally is lacking, which is impacting upon the approach of the police officers dealing with mental health related incidents.
5. The availability of the Street Triage Team I heard evidence that Nottinghamshire is pioneering in its provision of a Street Triage Team, a service that has been available since 2014. This team is comprised of one police officer and one community psychiatric nurse who can travel to mental health incidents to provide assessment and advice to the response officers, particularly in relation to exercising s.136 powers. I heard that this service is available between 8am and 1am, and that the resourcing of the service (both in terms of the shift patterns and the available cars) was determined by analysis of a data set in 2017. At the time that the incident arose with Kaine on 3 July 2022, no STT was available as it was out of hours. I am concerned that there is a need to review the data to ensure that the demand for the service in 2025 is still reflected by the shift patterns. I am concerned, based on the evidence that I heard from EMAS in relation to an increase of ~60% in mental health related calls, that the demand for service may have changed since 2017. I note that the Mental Health Code of Practice includes the following guidance at [16.23] in relation to triage and s.136: “When deciding that detention may be necessary, the police may also benefit from seeking advice before using section 136 powers in cases where they are unsure that the circumstances are sufficiently serious for using these powers. Local protocols should set out how this advice can be provided and who the police should contact, including outside of normal business hours”. I am concerned that I have not seen any local protocol as to who the police should contact out of hours, and I note that EMAS do have available mental health nurses between the hours of 1am and 8am. This again appears to be a local policy and communication issue.
6. Mental Health Services – ‘the gap’ I am concerned that there is a ‘gap’ in mental health services for those people who have a dual diagnosis of a recognised mental health condition, combined with a substance misuse diagnosis. Clinically, I understand that substance misuse can provide a barrier to effective treatment of any mental health condition. However, I have heard evidence that there is no service available to patients for management, monitoring and treatment in circumstances where they are unable to abstain from substances but require care for the residual mental health condition. In circumstances where it is clinically recognised that substance misuse can exacerbate the symptoms of many mental health conditions, this gives risk to a clear risk of future death. The evidence that I have heard is that once treatment or referral options for these patients have been exhausted, they are discharged from the Local Mental Health Team with signposting to other services e.g. substance misuse services/charities or CRISIS. These services often required self-referral, which is not realistic for many people in these circumstances. Kaine fell into this gap, and I am concerned that there is a risk of future death for other patients if this gap is not filled. Again, it seems to me that this is an issue of national concern.

Responses

3 respondents
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
25 Jul 2025 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust is providing training for all acute facing mental health staff on ABD in August and October 2025 and signs and symptoms, clinical assessment and escalation processes are now included within the Trust Fundamentals of Care training for mental health staff. The Trust has updated Internal Working Instructions and established a strategy group and works across the system to strategically plan access and treatment for people with dual diagnosis needs. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney

Regulation 28 Response: Mr. Kaine Regan Fletcher

I write in response to the inquest which was concluded on 25 July 2025 into the death of Mr Kaine Regan Fletcher. We accept your findings in relation to the received Regulation 28 and offer our sincere apologies to the family of Mr Fletcher. Please find below the Trust response in relation to the relevant three of the six matters of concern and actions taken.

Lack of joint agency policy/cross-sector working on Acute Behavioural Disorder/Disturbance (ABD) This point was accepted as important key learning prior to, during and at the conclusion of the inquest. Although this is clearly both a national and regional issue, the Trust wished to reiterate the internal learning and changes being made in response to the learning from M Fletcher’s death. There is training for all acute facing mental health staff from a GP medical volunteer from EMICS (voluntary emergency paramedic teams) arranged over two sessions. One session in August and the other in October 2025, specifically providing training on ABD. Signs and symptoms, clinical assessment and escalation processes are now included within the Trust Fundamentals of Care training for mental health staff under the medical emergency section. This has been peer reviewed by the GP medical volunteer from EMICS to ensure accuracy and appropriateness.

16 September 2025

Private and Confidential HM Assistant Coroner Alexandra Pountney

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA

A quick reference guide for staff has been developed alongside both Royal Colleges of Psychiatry and Nursing guidance and this has been peer reviewed by emergency services. This has been shared with the Street Triage Team and will be distributed broadly once all staff have received the training. We are conducting a review of ABD related content within PMVA and the provision of this to acute facing community mental health staff, including learning from past cases of ABD related deaths. The insights and expertise of , a leading topic expert and advisor to the previously NICE-endorsed Positive and Safe Violence Reduction Training Manual, will be incorporated into this process. A clinical guidance document is being developed for Trustwide clinical staff and developed in conjunction with pathways established within EMAS and Nottinghamshire Police. This will be finalised by the end of September 2025. This will be supported by a revised version of the clinical algorithm within Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) and Royal College of Emergency Medicine. The Trust have in development a clinical decision support tool that will be available for front facing acute mental health clinicians in supporting the knowledge and actions should ABD be a suspected clinical presentation. This will be finalised following consultation with wider agencies (Nottinghamshire Police and EMAS). The Trust is in discussions with Nottinghamshire Police and EMAS to establish a collaborative approach to address the concerns relating to patients with a clinical presentation of ABD including training, pathways and clinical guidance. There is an agreement with EMAS to meet with the Trust to explore opportunities for collaboration. This will be continued through to completion and take into consideration any wider national guidance from any response to this Regulation 28 Report received from Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

The availability of the Street Triage Team Since the conclusion of the inquest, the Trust has worked with Nottinghamhire Police colleagues in order to collate and analyse the data available to consider the current operational hours of the Street Triage Team. This review of the mental health incident demand experienced by Nottinghamshire police force, has actually highlighted that demand continues to be broadly at its highest during the operating hours of the Street Triage Team, meaning that the service model continues to be appropriate and offer best value and quality in its current format. However, to further strengthen our urgent mental health response to the public from the Trust, we are also currently undertaking a number of improvement programmes that will see us strengthen the offer made by our crisis services over the full twenty-four hour period, meaning that urgent mental health care will be more accessible to the public at all times of the day and night, every day of the week.

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA

Mental Health Services – ‘the gap’ Although this has been identified as a national issue by the coroner in this case, we did want to provide some information in response to this point from a Trust perspective as we recognise that there was a gap in provision of service for people with a dual diagnosis presentation during the time that Mr Fletcher accessed services in 2022. As part of the wider community mental health transformation programme which commenced in 2022, a key area for improvement was improving access to services for patients with a dual diagnosis. During 2022 this work was in its infancy and there was only one worker who was allocated to liaise with the four City Local Mental Health Teams (LMHTS). As the improvement work progressed, it became clear that the remote liaison was not working, and additional resource was also required. Key changes have since been made which includes co-located substance misuse workers, which includes Peer Support workers who have lived experience being located into the LMHTs, working as part of the team. The introduction of an additional three staff members and the service having its own referral pathway on the patient electronic system means that prior to any discharge, the core LMHT would be able to see the person is accessing the co-located practitioners and therefore consider any post discharge needs and liaison. As we have now established the workers within teams the staff are also embedded as part of the internal escalation meetings and processes should there be a requirement to escalate any concerns around discharge planning or unmet care needs. Whilst the structural changes that have been made, such as resource configuration, have made a huge difference for people with dual diagnosis needs, work has also been completed to support wider mental health staff in relation to core training and awareness for people with dual diagnosis needs. We continue to review and strategically plan access and treatment for people with dual diagnosis needs and this is in the form of a strategy group and works across the system including wider system partners and organisation, so people’s needs are not just considered in isolation. Public Health England is working alongside the services and planning to complete an evaluation of the pathway and wider system working which will inform further service developments to ensure that mental health services work with people holistically, in a non-judgemental way to ensure that they receive the right care and treatment. A key area of concern was also identified in relation to people that have an identified need which can be met by another service or organisation, such as third sector or voluntary services, and the process of self-referral. Whilst services work collaboratively with people, we recognise that it is not always realistic for some people to complete the appropriate self-referral processes and time is often dedicated by staff to do this however we have updated our team’s Internal Working Instructions which outlines the expectation of staff and services to ensure that this is clear. We will also be sharing and discussing this learning within a planned learning event to further support awareness and practice change.

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA

I can confirm that any responses from other organisations / individuals involved in this case, including the wider response from Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, will also be carefully reviewed, including any guidance shared and partnership working opportunities fully accepted. I hope that this response provide reassurance that the Trust has taken the concerns highlighted seriously and have robust plans to address these as far as practicable in order to improve services for our large and varied patient population.
College of Policing Police / Law Enforcement
19 Sep 2025 PDF
Action Planned

The NPCC clinical panel is reviewing existing guidance developed by the Faculty of Legal and Forensic Medicine regarding Acute Behavioural Disturbance. The College of Policing provides the Mental Health Approved Professional Practice (APP) to assist forces in developing their policies and responses to incidents relating to people with mental ill health. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney

Thank you for your report dated 25th July 2025 concerning the tragic death of Kaine Regan Fletcher. We extend our sincere condolences to his family and all those affected.

We have carefully considered the matters of concern raised in your Regulation 28 report. This response outlines the College of Policing’s position on Acute Behavioural Disturbance, and police training in respect of the Mental Health Act. In relation to the operational elements and local partnership working, we have been in contact with Nottinghamshire Police and understand that a number of measures are being implemented and a full response to the concerns you have raised is being provided.

1. Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD)

ABD is addressed in the College of Policing’s First Aid Learning Programme (FALP) under learning outcome 9 ‘Explain acute behavioural disturbance – recognise the signs and symptoms of acute behavioural disturbance’ (Module 2 and 4). Police forces are required to train this learning outcome for all public facing officers. The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) clinical panel recognises the complexity of ABD and following a meeting on 17th July 2025 the panel discussed the need to develop material to support the service’s management of incidents of ABD. This has led to the following actions:
• The panel is currently reviewing existing guidance developed by the Faculty of Legal and Forensic Medicine, alongside representatives, with the intention of ensuring first aid training remains appropriate
• The panel has offered clinical support to the NPCC Self Defence & Restraint (SDAR) Group and ongoing work in the Public & Personal Safety Training (PPST) curriculum
• The panel chair raised the aim of developing consensus on ABD with the NPCC Health & Safety strategic lead

The College recognises the term ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance’ (ABD) as an ‘umbrella term for a variety of medical conditions that can cause a person to behave in a way that is out of character and potentially harmful to themselves of others’ – as set out within the training material the College provides for police forces. This is informed by the position set out by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM). The key emphasis of the College ABD training is about recognising the potential for serious harm and acting accordingly. In particular, the training emphasises the importance of avoiding the use of force, where possible. One of the key messages within the ABD training material, is to ‘Avoid physical restraint unless absolutely necessary for the safety of the subject, self or public.’ The College is aware of the recent Delphi study publication, titled; Consensus on acute behavioural disturbance in the UK: a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study to determine what it is and how it should be managed. Humphries C, et al. Emerg Med J 2023. The study concluded by setting out ‘It is key that Acute Behavioural Disturbance should be understood to be a presentation, not a diagnosis.’ The College guidance does not focus on diagnosis, instead the focus is on presentation as outlined in the College’s ABD training. Since this was published, the Delphi study highlighted the need for consensus on shared terminology and offered some ideas in relation to using new terms, including the term ‘Agitation’ – The College of Policing sets out to support Health partners in leading and developing the work in this area. This is an area that requires further research and an evidence base to inform national policy. The police’s role in responding to ABD, particularly as a medical risk, needs to be informed and based on agreed guidance from our partners in Health – it is imperative that health should lead on areas of national health- related policy. The College recognises that ABD presentation can lead to risks of serious harm, and therefore medical intervention by health professionals, who are the most appropriate agency with the skills and expertise, is crucial in these cases. This is consistent with the principles set out within the national Right Care Right Person (RCRP) toolkit. This does not however absolve the police from being involved where there is an immediate risk of serious harm, or where a crime is involved. As it currently stands, the term Acute Behavioural Disturbance is a health term that is recognised across different agencies, and any changes to the term will have to be carefully mitigated to ensure that patients are not put at risk. The use of consistent, recognised terminology helps ensure appropriate response by emergency services and correct medical management. The Delphi study sets out, ’Specific terminology should be used to identify this group and provide a common language regarding prioritisation and management strategies’. The College is currently undertaking a review of the mental health Approved Professional Practice (APP), which will ensure that any development in the published guidelines in relation to ABD are updated to ensure consistency with updated health policy. Right Care Right Person (RCRP) is a national initiative that has been adopted by policing and partners under the National Partnership Agreement: Right Care, Right Person (RCRP) - GOV.UK with the aim to ensure that vulnerable people get the right support from the right services. The RCRP toolkit went live in June 2023 and forces have continued to work with partners to ensure effective implementation.

The RCRP toolkit, hosted by the College of Policing, applies to calls for service about:

• concern for the welfare of a person
• people who have walked out of a healthcare setting
• people who are absent without leave (AWOL) from mental health services
• medical incidents, including conveyance

The focus of RCRP is to ensure vulnerable people receive care from the most appropriate agency. This will often not be the police. The Right Care Right Person toolkit sets out that forces should work with partners, as follows: Protocols will need to be developed at a local partnership level to set out the lines of responsibility for each agency. Once agreed, these changes to ways of working must be communicated to staff within each agency and guidance provided.

2. Transporting patients

Where the police remove a patient under section 136 of the MHA, the default mode of transport is by ambulance or other healthcare-led transport. Transportation using a police vehicle should only be in exceptional circumstances. This should be subject to risk assessment. See Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983 (Department of Health, 2015).

The RCRP Toolkit sets out that ‘Staff should be aware of inter-agency attendance and transportation arrangements when dealing with s135 and s136 MHA patients, as well as casualties.’

implementation-guidance#13cbaa76-afc8-4491-b947-4e78b4b52a2f

3. Police training on s.136 MHA 1983 detention and mental health

The College of Policing’s Mental Health Training Programme provides learners with knowledge and skills that are required when responding to individuals with mental health conditions. The programme comprises a suite of learning standards for use at all levels of the service, setting out the learning requirements for staff working within different roles, and enabling progression so that learners can develop their understanding of the topic area as required for their role. The Mental Health Learning Programme is available via College Learn. The purpose of the programme is to ensure that officers and staff are able to recognise indicators of potential mental ill health and understand appropriate methods to communicate with and respond to people exhibiting those indicators. The programme specification and Trainer Guide has been updated as of October 2021. The College training on ABD is also available via College Learn, which is accessible for all forces to use as part of their organisational training programmes.

The College of Policing provides the Mental Health Approved Professional Practice (APP) to assist forces in developing their policies and responses to incidents relating to people with mental ill health. Within the APP there is specific guidance on how officers should explain the detention of a person under Section 136 of the MHA, which can be found on the following link. https://www.college.police.uk/app/mental- health/mental-health-detention#explanation-of-detention-avoid-the-use-of-arrest-terminology.

The College has liaised directly with Nottinghamshire Police and highlighted the current guidance available and following this we are aware that they have now developed specific guidance, based upon the APP guidance, for frontline officers to use when exercising this power.

4. Commitment to Continuous Improvement

The College remains committed to supporting forces in delivering lawful, proportionate, and effective responses to incidents. The concerns raised will be communicated with all forces within the national governance structures, where learning can be shared. The College will:

• Review all recommendations for potential learning through the NPCC First Aid Forum
• Review and update national guidance based on emerging learning
• Support forces in developing local protocols with partner agencies
• Promote national consistency through the Mental Health Forum and Tactical Delivery Board
• Encourage a culture of continuous improvement and reflective practice

We hope this response provides assurance of our commitment to addressing the issues raised and to preventing future deaths in similar circumstances. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any further information.
Department for Health and Social Care Central Government
19 Nov 2025 PDF
Action Planned

The Department and NHS England are finalising the Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Delivery framework to improve delivery of integrated, person-centred care across drug and alcohol treatment and mental health services. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 25 September 2025 about the death of Kaine Regan Fletcher. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for mental health and I am grateful for the additional time you have allowed for me to do so.

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Kaine’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.

Your report raises concerns addressed to a number of organisations and I understand your concerns. Those for my Department include the lack of joint agency policy/cross sector working on Acute Behavioural Disorder/Disturbance, police use of an ambulance as the mode of conveyance for section 136 detainees and the gap in mental health services for people who have a dual diagnosis of a mental health condition, combined with a substance misuse diagnosis. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns.

I have been advised by NHS England that it recognises the importance of ensuring that individuals presenting in extreme distress receive timely, safe, and effective care. However, the term “Acute Behavioural Disorder” (ABD) is not a formal diagnosis within the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which is the global diagnostic tool used in the NHS. ABD is an umbrella term often used across emergency services to describe behaviours linked with extreme agitation or distress, which may indicate a potentially life-threatening physical health emergency.

NHS England has noted the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ position statement and recommendations on ‘Acute behavioural disturbance’ and ‘excited delirium’ and fully supports ongoing multi-agency initiatives led by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, including new training launched in 2024.

Your concern about the lack of agreed joint agency policy between East Midlands Ambulance Service and the police on section 136 detentions is a matter for those organisations

However, I note that Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, in its response to your report, has confirmed it is in discussions with Nottinghamshire Police and East Midlands Ambulance Service to establish a collaborative approach to address the concerns relating to patients with a clinical presentation of ABD including training, pathways and clinical guidance.

With regard to your concerns about the police use of ambulances to convey people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act, the National Partnership Agreement on Right Care, Right Person (RCRP) between policing, health and social care partners and other relevant partners was published in July 2023, and sets out the principles around the RCRP approach which aims to ensure that those in need of mental health support or experiencing a mental health crisis receive the right support from the right professional. The RCRP framework promotes coordinated, evidenceinformed multi-agency responses (whether it is police, ambulance, or mental health services, or a joint agency response).

NHS England has issued comprehensive guidance, including on the conveyance of individuals detained under section 136, which sets out that:

- local partners – including police and ambulance services – should agree the most appropriate health-based vehicle provision, informed by lived experience, to ensure safe and compassionate transport;
- for people detained under section 136, the target ambulance response time is an average of 30 minutes, as set out in the NHS England Ambulance Quality Indicators.
- while police have the legal power to remove individuals under sections 135 and 136, health-based transport should usually be used. Police should accompany the individual to ensure a safe handover.

I understand that the College of Policing has addressed your concern about police training on section 136 detentions in its response to your report and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust has done so in respect of your concern about the local Street Triage Team.

Your report lastly raises concerns regarding the care of individuals with co-occurring mental health and drug or alcohol use disorders.

The Department recognises that, too often, people with co-occurring substance use and mental health needs do not receive the integrated, person-centred care they require and deserve. Although there are examples of good practice and integrated services, we recognise the need for better integrated care between mental health services and substance use services, to ensure people no longer fall through the gaps of treatment.

Dame Carol Black’s independent review of drugs1 underlined the complex relationship between mental health and drug and alcohol use. The review identified that people can be excluded from mental health services until they resolve their drug problem, while

1 Independent review of drugs by Professor Dame Carol Black - GOV.UK

also excluded from substance use services until their mental health problems have been addressed.

Working with subject matter experts, including people with lived experience, academics, clinicians, and service providers, the Department and NHS England are currently finalising the Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Delivery framework. This framework will provide national commitments and calls to the sector on how the health system can improve delivery of integrated, person-centred care across drug and alcohol treatment and mental health services.

This approach is fully aligned with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s guideline on coexisting severe mental illness and substance misuse ( 1, which states: “Do not exclude people with severe mental illness because of their substance misuse.”

NHS England continues to promote joined-up, holistic support for people with dual diagnosis needs, ensuring services work collaboratively to meet the full range of individual needs.

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
An investigation into the death of Kaine Regan FLETCHER was opened on 28 September 2022, and the final inquest hearing is currently being heard by me, sitting with a jury. The final inquest hearing started on 30 June 2025 and concluded on 25 July 2025.
Circumstances of the death
Kaine was a 26-year-old male with a diagnosis of Paranoid Personality Disorder and a history of substance misuse.

On 2 July 2022, Kaine called the police via 999 making threats to kill, if the police did not attend to him at his mum’s address. A double-crewed, marked police vehicle attended Kaine and arrived at 16:00. On arrival, the response officers formed the view that Kaine was suffering an acute episode of mental illness, and that they may need to exercise their
s.136 MHA 1983 powers to detain him. Kaine told the officers that he had recently used cocaine. The officers requested assistance from the Street Triage Team, a team formed through collaboration between Nottinghamshire Police and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, who duly attended to assess Kaine arriving at 17:04. The Street Triage Team comprised of one police officer and one community psychiatric nurse, travelling together in a marked police car. Kaine was assessed by the community psychiatric nurse not to require a Mental Health Act Assessment, and so the police did not exercise their s.136 powers. Rather, having had his physical health checked by paramedics between approximately 17:27 and 17:42, he was conveyed by marked police car back to his residential dwelling at the YMCA in Hucknall. The police incident log confirmed that Kaine was at the property by 19:46.

On 3 July 2022, at 00:04 and 00:16, respectively, two 999 calls were made by a member of Kaine’s family to EMAS due to a concern that he may have attempted to take his own life and, by the later call, that he was uncontactable by phone. EMAS advised the family member that the incident had been logged as a Category 3 response, and that there was an 8 hour wait for an ambulance.

At 00:33 a member of Kaine’s family called the police to report their concerns. A police resource was allocated to the incident, and two response officers in a marked police vehicle arrived at the YMCA at 01:55 to conduct a ‘safe and well check’. Those officers quickly formed the view that Kaine was suffering an acute episode of mental illness and that he had taken illicit substances, namely cocaine and nitrous oxide. To begin with, Kaine is amenable to attending hospital voluntarily for a Mental Health Act Assessment. He followed the police officers out of the building and got into their marked police car. The situation changed rapidly and within seconds of being inside the vehicle, Kaine vocalised his belief that the officers are not really police. The officers showed Kaine their ID, but the situation persisted and one of the officers detained Kaine using her s.136 powers; handcuffs are applied. This happened at around 02:34. More units were requested and arrived at the scene. Kaine began to resist the detention, and there was then a period of approximately half an hour where Kaine was being restrained by officers. The restraint continued as officers attempted to gain effective control of Kaine so that they could convey him to a place of safety by police vehicle.

During the period of restraint, Kaine’s physical condition deteriorated, and at 03:03 EMAS are called when the police recognise that he was displaying symptoms of Acute Behavioural Disorder. The incident was then deemed a medical emergency.

EMAS arrived on scene at 03:18. Kaine was pre-alerted to the Queens Medical Centre Resuscitation Department and conveyed there by ambulance. He arrived at 03:47.

Despite the best efforts of the medical teams at QMC, Kaine had developed rhabdomyolysis and went into multi-system organ failure, which culminated in an unsurvivable cardiac arrest. Kaine died at 09:46 on 3 July 2022.

The cause of death provided by the Home Office Pathologist is: 1(a) the physiological effects of exertion following a period of restraint, combined with cocaine and other substances.
Copies sent to
All other IPs

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0383
Date of report
25 July 2025
Coroner
Alexandra Pountney
Coroner area
Nottinghamshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 9
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 19 Sep 2025.

Sent to

College of Policing
Custodial Services
Department of Health and Social Care
East Midlands Ambulance Service
Faculty of Forensic & Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Police
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Royal College of Emergency Medicine
The Judicial and Coronial System

Part of a series

2 reports
2025-0363 All responses identified

Source links