Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Alexander Lewis

Ref: 2025-0539 Date: 24 Oct 2025 Coroner: Aled Gruffydd Area: Swansea Neath & Port Talbot Responses identified: 3 / 2

Pursuing drivers lacked the ability to communicate dynamic risk assessments, were overburdened with tasks leading to missed critical information, and police training suggested a two-officer crew for safety.

Date 24 Oct 2025
56-day deadline 19 Dec 2025
Responses identified 3 of 2
Road (Highways Safety) related deaths Wales prevention of future deaths reports (2019 onwards)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Pursuing drivers lacked the ability to communicate dynamic risk assessments, were overburdened with tasks leading to missed critical information, and police training suggested a two-officer crew for safety.
View full coroner's concerns
1. There was no opportunity for the pursuing driver to communicate a dynamic risk assessment to the control centre, to assist the control centre in making a decision to authorise or stand down the pursuit. the control centre indicated that such information would go towards authorising the pursuit as opposed to standing it down in the present case
2. The number of tasks having to be undertaken by the pursuing driver meant that vital information as to the risks involved in continuing the pursuit were missed, in the present case that being a contravention of a red light
3. The officer in charge of driver training confirmed that from a safety perspective, it would be safer to have the crew in a pursuit situation “double manned”.

Responses

3 respondents
Department of Transport Central Government
18 Nov 2025 PDF
Noted

The Department of Transport notes that there are no specific statutory guidance or mandatory distance regulations for yellow lines near junctions. The decision rests with the local authority, and traffic signing is devolved to the Welsh Government. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Aled,

Thank you for your letter of 4 November about mandatory distance regulations for parking.

I should note that there is no specific statutory guidance or mandatory distance regulations that stipulate the minimum distance single yellow lines must be situated from a junction.

Ultimately, it is for the local authority to assess that the visibility of the junction is sufficient and to determine how much they want to protect with yellow lines.

As you may be aware, traffic signing is now devolved and would be a matter for the Welsh Government.

Best wishes,

MINISTER FOR LOCAL TRANSPORT
Minister of State for Policing and Crime Other
5 Jan 2026 PDF
Noted

The Minister explains police driver training standards, noting that decisions on crewing are operational matters for Chief Constables. Pursuits resulting in a fatality are referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Aled,

Thank you for sending your report concerning the investigation into the death of Mr Alexander Rhys Lewis. I am replying as the Minister of State for Policing and Crime, and I apologise for the delay in responding.

My sincere sympathy is with Mr Lewis’s family. I was deeply saddened to read about the circumstances of his death and the impact on his family and those close to him.

I understand the importance of the concerns you have raised and I will respond to each in turn.

Police drivers operate in high-pressure situations to urgently respond to incidents and to pursue drivers who pose a danger to the public. The Government recognises the vital role police drivers play and is committed to ensuring they are trained to high and consistent standards to ensure their safety and that of the public. The Government works closely with the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing to ensure police driver training meets these high and consistent standards, as set out in the Road Traffic Act 1988 (Police Driving: Prescribed Training) Regulations. These regulations prescribe minimum standards of police driver training in line with the Police Driving Standards measures in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 is a legislation that enhances police powers and reforms the criminal justice system.

This Act amended the Road Traffic Act 1988 to require that an assessment of whether a constable or other ‘designated person’ has driven carelessly or dangerously compares their standard of driving against that of a competent and careful constable who has undertaken the same prescribed training, rather than with a member of the public, as was the case previously.

The prescribed minimum requirements for police driver training form part of a standardised programme, which is developed, maintained, and implemented by the NPCC and the College of Policing. This training is aligned with the College of Policing’s Authorised Professional Practice, Roads policing, police pursuits guidelines for managing pursuits, and the national police driver training curriculum. Officers engaging in pursuits must complete both levels of practical police pursuit driver training: Initial Phase Pursuit and the Tactical Phase Pursuit standard, as set by the College of Policing and within the College’s

Police Driving National Policing Curriculum. Police officers should also take account of the College of Policing’s Authorised Professional Practice guidance on whether a pursuit is appropriate. The College introduced licensing in April 2024 for police driver training providers to further professionalise police driving standards. These high standards of training are intended to ensure officers do not fall below the professional standards expected of them and to safeguard the public.

College Authorised Professional Practice guidelines set out that officers should give due regard to the purpose and justification of their actions and ensure any decision to pursue is necessary, proportionate, and balanced against threats, risks and the possibility of harm to the person being pursued, the officers involved and any others who may be affected. Any decision on whether to undertake a pursuit is an operational one and Authorised Professional Practice sets out the factors for officers to consider when planning and running an operation.

Your report sets out your concerns that the officer had no opportunity to communicate a dynamic risk assessment to the control room for it to take a decision on whether to authorise or stand down the pursuit; the number of tasks the officer had to undertake meant risks involved in continuing the pursuit were missed; and from a safety perspective, double-crewing is safer.

Authorisation of pursuits While officers should seek authorisation where possible, in accordance with Authorised Professional Practice, to engage in a pursuit, that Practice sets out that this may not always be possible, depending on the operational circumstances of an incident. Officers performing any role in pursuit management must be trained to the standards set out by the College of Policing and police drivers should not be authorised to pursue if they are unable to meet the required level of competence during training. The College of Policing’s Authorised Professional Practice sets out that, in some circumstances, the time available between recognising the need for action and the deadline for taking action may be too short to acquire authorisation from a control/communications room. Officers, in these circumstances, may self-authorise so long as they can justify the decision at a later time, in line with the National Decision Model. The National Decision Model is a used by everyone in policing. It encourages officers to act in accordance with the Code of Ethics (Ethical policing principles | College of Policing) It encourages them to use their discretion where appropriate and should reduce risk aversion. In a fast-moving incident, it makes clear that decision makers should adhere to their overarching mission to act with integrity to protect and serve the public.

Following each pursuit, reflective and lessons-learned meetings are held where forces review and analyse the decision to pursue and examine whether training protocols were followed.

Managing risks As set out above, College of Policing training requirements must be undertaken and met by officers before they can be qualified to engage in pursuits. This includes officers being trained to demonstrate competence in applying effective decision making from the initial phase to the tactical phase of a pursuit and the need to carry out dynamic risk assessments throughout.

Before engaging in pursuits, officers must be familiar with pursuit considerations and use the intelligence at hand to assess the level of risk posed by the pursued driver and the seriousness of the offence being committed, or suspected, in accordance with the National Decision Model. This allows officers to make decisions where many short-duration pursuits might not allow time for specific guidance to be communicated by a control room and communications room staff.

Crewing Decisions on crewing are operational matters and at the discretion and judgement of Chief Constables who determine how to deploy available resources to deal with issues for which the force is responsible, considering specific local problems and demands.

Any pursuit that results in a fatality is taken very seriously and referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduc, a statutory body with powers and duties to investigate under the Police Reform Act 2002 and associated legislation. The Independent Office for Police Conduct has the authority to independently investigate cases where there has been a death or serious injury following police contact, public complaints against police, and conduct matters where a member of the public has been adversely affected and/or public interest requires it. Following its investigations, the Independent Office for Police Conduct may direct disciplinary proceedings for persons serving with the police and/or refer them to the Director of Public Prosecutions for a charging decision. Following the Independent Office for Police Conduct investigation into Mr Lewis’ death, I note they concluded that the investigation was not subject to special procedures and the decision-maker found the service of the police to be acceptable.

I hope this response is helpful in responding to the concerns raised in your report. On a personal note, I wish again to extend my condolences to the family and friends of Mr Lewis, and to thank you for bringing this issue to my attention.

Very best wishes,

Minister of State for Policing and Crime
South Wales Police Police / Law Enforcement
9 Jan 2026 PDF
Noted

South Wales Police acknowledges the concerns about crewing of Road Policing Unit officers during pursuits, but states its training and operational model are designed to ensure public safety and officer competence. They highlight national standards, training, and post-pursuit review processes, while also emphasizing the need to balance operational effectiveness and resource availability, deeming single crewing the most practical option. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Senior Coroner Gruffyd,

South Wales Police offer its sincerest sympathies to Mr Lewis’ family on this case. South Wales Police also acknowledge the concerns raised regarding the crewing of Road Policing Unit (RPU) officers during pursuits and specifically in relation to the case of Alexander Rhys Lewis. Our current operational model and training standards are designed to ensure public safety, officer competence, and compliance with national guidance.

Training and Operational Practice Police pursuit training, as delivered under the College of Policing’s Police Driving National Policing Curriculum (PDNPC) to all national forces, reflects real-world operational conditions. During both Initial Phase Pursuit (IPP) and Tactical Phase Pursuit (TPP) training, officers operate single-crewed, even when accompanied by an instructor, so that they replicate day-to-day working practices. This approach ensures officers are fully prepared for the responsibilities they will assume in live operations. While single-crewed, officers are trained to:

• Receive and process intelligence to build a dynamic picture of the subject vehicle and driver.
• Deliver accurate commentary using the National Surveillance Glossary, enabling other units to position effectively for tactical intervention.
• Manage the Tactical Phase, which includes high-speed driving, commentary, tactical use of lights and sirens, and implementation of pursuit resolution tactics.
• Continuously apply the eight pursuit considerations and produce Dynamic Risk Assessments (DRAs) that reflect evolving circumstances.
• Make real-time decisions on proportionality and justification for continuing or terminating the pursuit.

National Standards and Professional Guidance The prescribed minimum requirements for police driver training are set by the NPCC and College of Policing and aligned with Authorised Professional Practice (APP). Officers engaging in pursuits must complete both IPP and TPP training. Since April 2024, the College has introduced licensing for training providers to further professionalise standards. These measures ensure officers meet the highest professional standards and safeguard the public. APP guidance requires that any decision to pursue is necessary, proportionate, and balanced against threat, risk, and harm to all parties. Decisions remain operational and must consider risk factors and proportionality throughout.

Resourcing and Operational Realities Adopting a default position of double-crewing vehicles for pursuits would significantly reduce South Wales Police’s ability to maintain specialist roads policing coverage across the wider network. Our challenge is to fully address the concerns raised in the Reg 28 notice while safeguarding our statutory duty to serve the broader South Wales community and manage wider risk. When setting crewing models, we must strike a balance between operational effectiveness and resource availability. To sustain a strong capability for pursuits and TPAC tactics across the road network, single crewing remains the most practical option given the number of vehicles and trained officers required. This approach enables us to respond effectively to both planned and spontaneous incidents while maintaining public safety and operational resilience. As a force, we continually assess resources to ensure capability and capacity are maintained across the area. We are confident in the national training both initial and refresher undertaken by our officers, which equips them to carry out Dynamic Risk Assessments and make informed decisions, including standing down when risk outweighs benefit. We fully support officers in exercising this professional judgment.

Post-Pursuit Review and Continuous Learning South Wales Police have robust post-pursuit review processes, bringing together the Driving Training Unit (DTU) and operational teams to examine tactics and circumstances and embed learning. This ensures continuous improvement and reinforces our commitment to public safety and officer professionalism. In addition, following the Independent Office for Police Conduct investigation into Mr Lewis’ death, the investigation was not subject to special procedures, however we will continue to focus on continuous improvement in relation to pursuits as highlighted above.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 13th December 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Alexander Rhys Lewis. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 17th October 2025.

The medical cause of death is 1a) chest injuries 1b) road traffic collision (motorcyclist)

The conclusion of the inquest as to how Mr Lewis came to his death was a road traffic collision whilst being pursued by the police.
Circumstances of the death
The deceased was Alexander Rhys Lewis and he was pronounced dead on the 2nd December 2025 at St Helens Road, Swansea. The cause of death was chest injuries caused by a road traffic collision in which he was a motorcyclist.

The collision has occurred shortly after Alex, whilst riding a Yamaha motorcycle failed to stop for a South Wales Police Roads Policing Units on the Kingsway, Swansea. The Yamaha motorcycle has entered onto St Helens Road from the direction of the Kingsway roundabout where it has carried out an overtake of an unidentified white motor vehicle in the vicinity of the pedestrian crossing. The Yamaha motorcycle than appears to accelerate after completing this manoeuvre. At the same time the silver Toyota Prius has been in the process of emerging slowly from the give way junction of Wyndham Street and turning right onto St Helens Road. On seeing the Toyota Prius the rider of the Yamaha motor cycle has braked heavily causing the motorcycle to go into a sideways skid, where the motorcycles off side has collided heavily with the off side of the Toyota Alex was pronounced deceased at the scene.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0539
Date of report
24 October 2025
Coroner
Aled Gruffydd
Coroner area
Swansea Neath & Port Talbot

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 19 Dec 2025.

Sent to

Home Office
South Wales Police

Source links