AR-2: Protocol for Post-Incident Debriefing
Noted · No statement from Metropolitan Police Service found
Recommended
At an early date there should be liaison between the IPCC, the MPS and ACPO (and, more significantly, lawyers acting for each) with a view to establishing a protocol for the future conduct in the event of a shooting by a police officer of an early debriefing as an obligation equal and complementary to any IPCC investigation.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended establishing a protocol for early debriefings following fatal police shootings. In conclusions from Commander Neil Basu's review in June 2014, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) stated that it had engaged with the recommendation but had been unable to secure agreement or cooperation from the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) (Metropolitan Police Service response, Jun 2014). The MPS added that debriefs would be disclosable in future judicial proceedings and could not be fully anonymised, restricting their effectiveness (Metropolitan Police Service response, Jun 2014). In August 2014, Deputy Chief Constable (DCC) Simon Chesterman, National Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) Lead for Armed Policing, stated that the MPS, the College of Policing, and ACPO had produced approved practice for conducting debriefs in death or serious injury cases (Simon Chesterman, Aug 2014).
Addressed to Metropolitan Police Service · Full record