Total NIO-funded Inquiry costs: £155.6m. Full cost including MOD (£35.6m for legal and other) is £191.2m. This was the most expensive UK public inquiry until overtaken by IICSA and COVID-19. No core participant legal funding scheme - families funded through other means.
Total NIO-funded Inquiry costs: £155.6m. Full cost including MOD (£35.6m for legal and other) is £191.2m. This was the most expensive UK public inquiry until overtaken by IICSA and COVID-19. No core participant legal funding scheme - families funded through other means.
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsKatie Lam · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department has spent on legal and administrative costs in connection to the Saville Inquiry.
Answered by Ministry of Defence: This information is publicly available at;https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a796e76e5274a3864fd6eef/bloody_sunday_inquiry_-_annual_expenditure_by_category_to_end_may_2010.pdf
Early Day MotionHouse of CommonsMr Gregory Campbell · Democratic Unionist Party
Said: That this House notes that, on 27 January 1972, Sergeant Peter Gilgunn and Constable David Montgomery, two police officers on patrol in Londonderry, were murdered by the Provisional IRA using a Thompson sub machine gun; further notes that this happened in the vicinity of, and …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsColum Eastwood · Social Democratic & Labour Party
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate his Department has made of the cost to the public purse of (a) legal costs and (b) other support provided to Soldier F relating to the case of the alleged murders of James Wray and …
Answered by Ministry of Defence: The Ministry of Defence is committed to supporting veterans and their families. As part of this, Soldier F has received legal and welfare support throughout his legal proceedings at public expense. The legal fees associated with these proceedings (including associated judicial reviews) amount to £4.3 million, which may rise marginally once final bills are received. These costs cover the period …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsJohnny Mercer · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what (a) meetings, (b) discussions, (c) correspondence and (d) other communications took place between Baron Saville of Newdigate and former Prime Minister Blair (i) before and (ii) during the existence
Answered by Northern Ireland Office: The information requested is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsJohnny Mercer · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what the cost was of the Saville Inquiry into Bloody Sunday; and if he will provide a breakdown of the costs.
Answered by Northern Ireland Office: The total cost of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry to the end of May 2010 is £191.2 million. These are the publicly available figures that were published following the completion of the inquiry and publication of the report in 2010.
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsGavin Robinson · Democratic Unionist Party
Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what (a) meetings, (b) correspondence and (c) other communication occurred between former Prime Minister Tony Blair and Baron Saville of Newdigate (i) before, (ii) during and (iii) after the Saville Inquiry into Bloody Sunday.
Answered by Cabinet Office: Information about correspondence and other communication between Mr Blair (as Prime Minister) and Lord Saville (as Head of the Inquiry) is not readily available. The information is contained in paper records of the Inquiry for a 12-year period and records of the Prime Minister's Office covering a 10-year period. For this reason an answer could only be provided at disproportionate …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsMr Gregory Campbell · Democratic Unionist Party
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what the final costs were for each of the participating legal teams and individuals involved in the Saville Inquiry; and what costs in that inquiry were incurred after 2005.
Answered by Northern Ireland Office: The team costs for each of the participating legal teams are detailed in the enclosed attachment. A full breakdown of the legal costs from 2005 onwards is not readily available. The table below provides a less detailed breakdown. Costs £ 2004/ 2005 2005/ 2006 2006/ 2007 2007/ 2008 2008/ 2009 2009/ 2010 2010/ 2011 Inquiry Counsel fees 1,579,400 840,342 855,342 …
The Bloody Sunday Inquiry, chaired by Lord Saville of Newdigate, was established in 1998 to examine the events of 30 January 1972 when British soldiers shot 26 unarmed civilians during a civil rights march in Derry/Londonderry, killing 13 immediately and another who died later from injuries. The inquiry reported in June 2010 after 12 years of investigation.
The inquiry made 10 recommendations, though the available evidence indicates these were findings of fact rather than specific policy recommendations. Prime Minister David Cameron responded immediately to the report's publication with a statement to Parliament on 15 June 2010, accepting all findings in full. In his statement, Cameron acknowledged that 'What happened on Bloody Sunday was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong.' He further stated that 'Some members of our Armed Forces acted wrongly' and offered an apology on behalf of the government and country, saying 'I am deeply sorry.'
The government's response represents a significant moment in British-Irish relations, with the Prime Minister's apology and acceptance of the inquiry's findings marking a formal acknowledgement of state responsibility for the events. The Saville Report's findings effectively replaced those of the earlier 1972 Widgery Report, which had largely exonerated the soldiers involved.
However, the available public record shows no documented evidence of progress updates, implementation reviews, or resulting legislation in the 16 years since the report's publication. While all 10 recommendations were accepted by the government, the absence of recorded follow-up activity in the public domain means the practical outcomes beyond the initial acceptance and apology cannot be assessed from the evidence provided.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated- Prime Minister's formal apology to Parliament on 15 June 2010 acknowledging that the events of Bloody Sunday were 'unjustified and unjustifiable' - Official government acknowledgement that some members of the Armed Forces acted wrongly on 30 January 1972 - Establishment of new historical record through the Saville Report findings, replacing the conclusions of the 1972 Widgery ReportUnfinished business · AI-generated- No published evidence has been identified regarding action on any of the 10 recommendations beyond the initial government acceptance - No formal implementation reviews or progress updates have been recorded in the 16 years since the report's publication - No key legislation resulting from the inquiry has been documented
Recommendation tracking
The Saville Inquiry made findings of fact about the events of Bloody Sunday, not actionable recommendations. PM Cameron apologised and accepted the findings on 15 June 2010.
The Saville Inquiry was established in 1998 explicitly to re-examine the events of Bloody Sunday after the Widgery Tribunal's findings were widely rejected as inadequate.