Public Inquiry

1957 Bank Rate Tribunal

Completed · Chair: Lord Justice Parker · Established November 1957 · Commissioned by HM Treasury

Statutory tribunal into allegations that advance information about the Bank Rate rise of 7 September 1957 was improperly disclosed to City financiers.

More about this inquiry

Statutory tribunal into allegations that advance information about the Bank Rate rise of 7 September 1957 was improperly disclosed to City financiers. Heard evidence through late 1957 and reported in January 1958, concluding there was no justification for the allegations and that no improper disclosure had occurred.

Historical inquiry (pre-Inquiries Act 2005). Listed for reference; recommendation progress is not actively tracked.

Where it stands

The inquiry made no formal recommendations.

Costs

£7,700

Total reported cost to January 1958 Costs in detail

Parliament

3

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Costs

Total reported cost: £7,700
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Jan 1958 (cum.) £7,700 Not reported Not reported

Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 14 Nov 1957 to 28 Jan 1958.

Minister reported total tribunal cost as about GBP7,700. Approximate nominal pounds; no inflation adjustment or detailed cost breakdown supplied. Period fields identify establishment and the answer date as a reporting checkpoint, not an annual accounts period. The 4 February 1958 answer separately says publication price was calculated to recover printing and selling expenses; it does not establish actual revenues recovered.

Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)

14 Nov 1957 – 28 Jan 1958 · Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)

Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 14 Nov 1957 to 28 Jan 1958.

Minister reported total tribunal cost as about GBP7,700. Approximate nominal pounds; no inflation adjustment or detailed cost breakdown supplied. Period fields identify establishment and the answer date as a reporting checkpoint, not an annual accounts period. The 4 February 1958 answer separately says publication price was calculated to recover printing and selling expenses; it does not establish actual revenues recovered.

Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)

Detailed cost breakdown · to Jan 1958

Parliamentary activity

3 mentions since Feb 1958
3 debates
View all 3 mentions →

Legacy & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Bank Rate Tribunal of 1957-58 investigated allegations that advance information about the Bank of England's decision to raise Bank Rate from 5% to 7% on 19 September 1957 had been improperly disclosed, enabling certain individuals to profit. Established under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921 and chaired by Lord Justice Parker, the tribunal examined whether ministers, civil servants, or City figures had exploited inside knowledge for personal gain. The tribunal's report, published on 21 January 1958, found no evidence of improper disclosure and exonerated all those under suspicion. The inquiry produced no recommendations and led to no immediate legislative or regulatory changes. The tribunal's significance lies primarily in its use of the 1921 Act procedures to investigate allegations of misconduct at the intersection of politics and finance. While the case contributed to public discourse about insider trading and market regulation, statutory controls on insider dealing were not introduced until the Company Securities (Insider Dealing) Act 1985, nearly three decades later. The Bank Rate Tribunal remains notable as an early post-war example of a formal inquiry into alleged financial impropriety involving government officials, though its direct impact on policy or institutional reform was minimal.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generatedNone identified - the tribunal made no recommendations and produced no direct legislative or structural reforms
Unfinished business · AI-generatedNone identified - the tribunal made no recommendations

Recommendation tracking

Tribunal found no wrongdoing and cleared all those accused of improper disclosure. Made no formal recommendations.

Key facts

Duration: 2 months Total reported cost: £8k