Select committee: Education Committee
Conclusion 26
Seventh Report - Persistent absence and support for disadvantaged pupils
Published 27 Sep 2023
Paragraph 131
Addressed to Department for Education
Education Committee Persistent absence and support for disadvantaged pupils All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We have seen overwhelming evidence indicating a radical increase in mental health difficulties amongst school pupils since the covid-19 pandemic. With CAMHS waiting lists at all-time highs, and pupils on three-year waiting lists in some parts of the country, it is evident that the current capacity of mental health services is grossly 66 Persistent absence and support for disadvantaged pupils inadequate. Whilst the Department has issued non-statutory guidance on mental health in schools, it needs to do more to improve its offer of support for these pupils.
From: Education Committee, Seventh Report - Persistent absence and support for disadvantaged pupils (HC 970), paragraph 131, 27 September 2023
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 6 December 2023 (deadline 27 November 2023).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The Government states that it "accepts the majority of the committee's recommendations" and has provided its rationale where it does not accept others.
- On daily attendance data, the Department agrees with the aim of 100% of state-funded schools sharing data and intends to introduce regulations to mandate participation "no sooner than September 2024", subject to continued engagement and "the usual parliamentary procedures".
- The Government agrees the attendance guidance should be made statutory, but says it will legislate "when parliamentary time allows".
- It does not accept ring-fenced funding for local authority attendance work, saying core functions "can and should" be funded through the Central School Services Block, and "cautious" on a national roll-out of attendance mentors pending evaluation of the pilot.
- It does not believe a cross-government assessment of pupil mental health is "necessary at this time", and has "concerns" that a separate mental health absence code is "unhelpful in practice".