Select committee: Education Committee

Recommendation 69

Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention Published 17 May 2024 Paragraph 284 Addressed to Department for Education
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We recognise the importance of the work done through the behaviour hubs programme since 2020. Schools need practical advice and guidance on managing pupil behaviour and creating a positive behavioural culture. We recommend expanding the behaviour hubs programme to increase capacity and allow more schools to benefit from this programme, which could also help teacher retention.

From: Education Committee, Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention (HC 119), paragraph 284, 17 May 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 January 2025 (deadline 17 July 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it "will consider the report's findings and recommendations carefully" and points to its own programme, including recruiting an additional 6,500 teachers, while setting out agreement and disagreement on individual recommendations.

  • On extending the Teacher Workforce Model to further education, the Department says it "will continue to keep the schools and further education estimates separate" because of "the differing factors determining both the demand and supply of teachers".
  • On subject-level data, it says it "will explore publishing subject level leaver rates" in future School Workforce Census publications, but does not publish reasons for leaving by subject "due to small sample sizes".
  • On a bursary for career changers, it states "We do not believe there is a need to introduce a bursary specifically for career changers", noting that such trainees can access existing bursaries and scholarships.
  • On NPQ funding, it is "committed to continue delivering funded NPQs in 2025", with future funding "confirmed in due course following the multiyear Spending Review".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error