Select committee: Education Committee

Conclusion 53

Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention Published 17 May 2024 Paragraph 220 Addressed to Department for Education
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We welcome the Department’s initial efforts to support flexible working through the Flexible Working Toolkit launched in summer 2023. However, with only 15% of senior leaders aware of its existence, and even fewer - only 4% - reporting that they found it useful, far more needs to be done to increase awareness of the toolkit amongst school leaders and ensure it is meeting their needs.

From: Education Committee, Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention (HC 119), paragraph 220, 17 May 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 January 2025 (deadline 17 July 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it "will consider the report's findings and recommendations carefully" and points to its own programme, including recruiting an additional 6,500 teachers, while setting out agreement and disagreement on individual recommendations.

  • On extending the Teacher Workforce Model to further education, the Department says it "will continue to keep the schools and further education estimates separate" because of "the differing factors determining both the demand and supply of teachers".
  • On subject-level data, it says it "will explore publishing subject level leaver rates" in future School Workforce Census publications, but does not publish reasons for leaving by subject "due to small sample sizes".
  • On a bursary for career changers, it states "We do not believe there is a need to introduce a bursary specifically for career changers", noting that such trainees can access existing bursaries and scholarships.
  • On NPQ funding, it is "committed to continue delivering funded NPQs in 2025", with future funding "confirmed in due course following the multiyear Spending Review".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error