Select committee: Education Committee

Conclusion 51

Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention Published 17 May 2024 Paragraph 208 Addressed to Department for Education
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Since the pandemic, flexible working has been widely embraced across different professions and sectors of the economy. However, this has not been replicated in the education sector. If the education sector is to remain competitive, particularly in the recruitment of graduates, more must be done to increase opportunities for flexible working in schools.

From: Education Committee, Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention (HC 119), paragraph 208, 17 May 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 January 2025 (deadline 17 July 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it "will consider the report's findings and recommendations carefully" and points to its own programme, including recruiting an additional 6,500 teachers, while setting out agreement and disagreement on individual recommendations.

  • On extending the Teacher Workforce Model to further education, the Department says it "will continue to keep the schools and further education estimates separate" because of "the differing factors determining both the demand and supply of teachers".
  • On subject-level data, it says it "will explore publishing subject level leaver rates" in future School Workforce Census publications, but does not publish reasons for leaving by subject "due to small sample sizes".
  • On a bursary for career changers, it states "We do not believe there is a need to introduce a bursary specifically for career changers", noting that such trainees can access existing bursaries and scholarships.
  • On NPQ funding, it is "committed to continue delivering funded NPQs in 2025", with future funding "confirmed in due course following the multiyear Spending Review".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error