Select committee: Education Committee
Conclusion 1
6th Report - Further Education and Skills
Published 23 Sep 2025
Addressed to Department for Education
Education Committee Further Education and Skills All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Given the primacy of the Government’s economic growth mission, and the emphasis the Government has placed on a high-functioning and forward- looking skills system to deliver that mission, the comparison between the status of Skills England on the one hand and organisations such as the Met Office and the DVLA on the other is a weak one. Skills England has been given the crucial role of transforming skills opportunities and driving growth and it is vital that it is able to work impartially and, if necessary, challenge Government policy. We were concerned, therefore, by the reluctance of the Chairs and CEOs of Skills England to comment on the adequacy of funding for the FE sector when they gave oral evidence. Furthermore, without a statutory foundation, Skills England may be altered or abolished by this or any future Government and without the consent of Parliament. (Conclusion, Paragraph 17)
From: Education Committee, 6th Report - Further Education and Skills (HC 666), 23 September 2025
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 9 December 2025 (deadline 23 November 2025).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the Committee's report and shares its views on the importance of skills and the FE sector, accepting some recommendations, saying others are already in place or under review, and not taking forward several others.
- It accepts the recommendation to monitor and report annually on compliance with provider access legislation, with the Careers and Enterprise Company data publication "expected to be in spring 2026".
- On Skills England, it says the review committed to by Ministers is due "within 18 to 24 months" of it becoming an Executive Agency, and that leadership structure is best considered within that broader review.
- It does not take forward devolving 16 to 19 funding, stating "it is important to maintain a national offer which is consistently high quality across the country" and that "16 to 19 funding has not been devolved".
- It does not take forward re-introducing all-age Level 7 apprenticeship funding, saying public funding should be prioritised "towards those at the start of their working lives", and says there are "currently no plans" for a pay review body for FE.