Select committee: Education Committee

Conclusion 30

Third report - A plan for an adult skills and lifelong learning revolution Published 19 Dec 2020 Paragraph 82 Addressed to Department for Education
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The community learning budget has been capped at an arbitrary level for ten years. Community learning funding is overly bureaucratic; an average community learning provider may have to negotiate up to ten different funding streams, all with different rules and outcomes. This places unnecessary strain on providers, and takes up time and resources that should be spent on delivery.

From: Education Committee, Third report - A plan for an adult skills and lifelong learning revolution (HC 278), paragraph 82, 19 December 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 March 2021.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it has "considered the findings and recommendations of the report carefully" and responds to each recommendation, largely by pointing to existing and planned measures such as the Skills for Jobs White Paper and the Lifetime Skills Guarantee.

  • On a long-term strategy, it points to the Skills for Jobs White Paper and a Lifelong Loan Entitlement equivalent to four years of post-18 education from 2025, and says it will consult on its detail and scope "later this year", with legislation "where necessary".
  • On funding, it says funding beyond 2021-22 "will be considered as part of a wider Spending Review later this year which will include full costings".
  • On devolving National Careers Service funding, it states "There are no plans to devolve careers budgets".
  • On the Union Learning Fund, it says it "chose not to continue to support" it, and will instead use the funding for wider skills and retraining.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error