Select committee: Education Committee

Conclusion 26

Second Report - Educational poverty: how children in residential care have been let down and what to do about it Published 8 Jul 2022 Paragraph 66 Addressed to Department for Education
Conclusion (the committee's words)
All looked-after children should be receiving full-time education in a DfE registered school—it is unacceptable for local authorities to settle for unregulated education provision as an alternative.

From: Education Committee, Second Report - Educational poverty: how children in residential care have been let down and what to do about it (HC 57), paragraph 66, 8 July 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 10 November 2022 (deadline 8 September 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it "fully agrees with the core message" that looked-after children are educationally disadvantaged and accepts the wide majority of recommendations fully or in part, with other recommendations handled through existing or planned reforms.

  • On data, it says it "will publish the recommended breakdowns in the 2023 releases", in conjunction with its confidentiality policy, which "may result in us needing to suppress low numbers".
  • On putting the extended Virtual School Head role on a statutory footing, it says longer-term plans, including whether to do so, "are under active consideration", informed by an independent evaluation.
  • On a maximum 20-day timeframe for Schools Adjudicator decisions, it says this "would be unlikely to improve the speed of decisions", and it has "no plans" to extend Ofsted's remit to assess admissions.
  • It is committed to a new school-movement framework and local authority backstop power, with a formal public consultation "in due course" and primary legislation "when an appropriate legislative opportunity arises".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error