The role of School Governing Bodies
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“This inquiry looked at the existing role of governing bodies, and the implications of recent Government policy developments in education for them, as well as a range of issues concerning recruitment, reward and responsibilities. The Education Committee Report found that too few school governing bodies are taking advantage of new regulations to make them more effective, and that more support was needed to help school governors raise their game. Original terms of reference for this inquiry Report published: Role of School Governing Bodies Government Response published”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
Governing bodies perform a critical role in school leadership but, despite approximately 300,000 individuals serving as school governors in England, vacancies continue to be an issue for many governing bodies. The quality of governance in many schools is also inadequate.
In September 2012, the Government introduced regulations which provide additional flexibility for the governing bodies of maintained schools to reconstitute themselves to be smaller, with an emphasis on skills as opposed to prescribed constitutions. Our inquiry concludes that these regulations provide the opportunity for governing bodies to recruit individuals with appropriate skills and address vacancies. However, many schools are not yet taking full advantage of the regulations. There is a role for the Government in spelling out more clearly what models of governance are now possible within the new regulations, along with explaining how these could be beneficial in different school contexts. Lessons should be learned from the newer forms of governance appearing in academies, and greater consideration given to how groups of schools can be governed.
Governing bodies need to get better at identifying the mixture of representation and skills they require in order to be effective, and tailoring their recruitment accordingly. To assist with the recruitment of skilled individuals from businesses, we recommend that the Government review the current incentives for and requirements on, businesses that release their staff for governor duties, including for academies.
A strengthening of current approaches to intervention in poor or failing governing bodies is required. We recommend that the Government investigate the reasons why so many local authorities and the Secretary of State have been reluctant to use their powers of intervention more often where governance is failing. We also recommend that the Government reviews processes for removing poorly performing chairs from office and give governing bodies the power to remove poorly performing governors.
Ofsted’s clearer expectations of governing bodies will encourage governors to identify weakness where it exists, and help to raise standards across the board. The Government’s focus on peer-to-peer support for governing bodies is also welcome. However, too many governors have not received suitable training and we recommend that the Government require all schools to offer training to new governors. As a rule, we do not advocate remuneration for governors, but recommend that the Government give further consideration to certain circumstances in which it may be appropriate to pay governors—for example, when governors use their skills to improve governance in other schools.
Clerks are vital to the success of governing bodies and our inquiry indicates clearly that the role of clerk should be a professional one. High quality support and information for clerks should be a priority and the Government should work with the NGA to rectify the loss of much valuable detail from the new Governors’ Handbook.
What the government said
2nd Report - The Role of School Governing Bodies - Volume III (Additional written evidence)
No government response is linked to this report.
2nd Report - The Role of School Governing Bodies - Volume II (Volume II - Oral and written evidence)
No government response is linked to this report.
2nd Report - The Role of School Governing Bodies - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes)
The government responded on 13 September 2013.
The government's response agrees with the Committee on a number of governance recommendations, such as external reviews, clerk training and removing barriers to recruitment, but disagrees on others, including a new role for Ofsted on Interim Executive Boards and mandatory governor training.
- On training, it states that "Good schools don't need government to mandate training" and that universal mandatory training "risks being inappropriate for some and a barrier to recruiting others"; it says "We will keep the position under review."
- On time off for academy governors, it is "considering the extent" to which the lack of a legal requirement is a barrier and "will explore the option" of amending the Employment Rights Act 1996.
- It disagrees that Ofsted needs a new role in recommending Interim Executive Boards, saying this "could blur the boundary of responsibilities" between the Chief Inspector, the local authority and the Secretary of State.
- On clerks, it states NCTL "will have trained 2,000 highly-skilled professional clerks" by 2015, but says it does not think SGOSS is ideally placed to recruit clerks and has "no plans" to fund this.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 5 November 2012 to 13 September 2013.
- Report 3 reports
- Government response 13 Sep 2013