Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 5

First Report - Ready for War? Published 4 Feb 2024 Paragraph 35 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
In a functioning democracy, the House of Commons Defence Committee needs to be routinely informed about the planning assumptions and readiness of the nation’s armed forces. We therefore recommend that—following the Minister’s welcome commitment to work with us—the Government propose how we and our successors can receive at least annually a meaningfully detailed update on the readiness of the UK Armed Forces, taking account of our conclusions above.

From: Defence Committee, First Report - Ready for War? (HC 26), paragraph 35, 4 February 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 25 April 2024 (deadline 4 April 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees there is no regular mechanism to scrutinise readiness and offers an annual open session, releases some Defence Planning Assumptions headlines, and sets out its position on stockpiles, recruitment and procurement.

  • On transparency, the government "recognises that the Committee should have public access to more information on planning assumptions and readiness" and releases headlines from the 2023 assumptions, committing to release "as much as possible" of the next iteration "when national and NATO planning processes have matured".
  • It agrees the response time for the inquiry was slow and "will make every effort to ensure this is not repeated".
  • On the £1.95bn from the Spring Budget 2023, it states the money "will be spent in full on measures to address gaps in our capabilities". It says exact stockpile holdings are "not releasable on the grounds of national security".
  • On recruitment and retention, it says a formal response to each Haythornthwaite Review recommendation "will be published during 2024", with next steps for delivery and implementation for each.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error