Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 10

4th Report – The Armed Forces Covenant Published 8 Apr 2025 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The evidence available to help us understand how well the Covenant is working is currently very fragmented. This makes recognising success, learning lessons and holding organisations to account difficult. The Minister told us there were ‘plans afoot’ to create structures that can improve Government’s understanding of how well the Covenant is working. (Conclusion, Paragraph 36)

From: Defence Committee, 4th Report – The Armed Forces Covenant (HC 572), 8 April 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 June 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The MOD agrees with the Committee's main conclusions on the Armed Forces Covenant and accepts the recommendations on extending the Covenant Legal Duty and on data collection, while stating that UK-wide minimum standards 'would not be appropriate'.

  • The MOD agrees with the conclusions at Paragraphs 13 and 20 and recognises that application of the Covenant principles 'varies across the UK'.
  • On a strategy for consistent application, it says the Legal Duty is 'deliberately flexible and does not mandate outcomes', and that UK-wide minimum standards would not be appropriate. It will provide training materials, webinars, downloadable resources and updated statutory guidance.
  • It accepts the recommendation to extend the Duty to all government departments and the devolved governments. Officials are 'currently developing plans' for this, and it acknowledges the extension will place 'additional strain' on departments and local authorities.
  • It accepts the recommendation on data collection, says the evidence available is 'limited', and will hold the next Covenant conference in July 2025. On departmental reporting it will 'engage with OGDs to consider how best they can report'.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error