Select committee: Defence Committee
Conclusion 7
Ninth Report - It is broke — and it’s time to fix it: The UK’s defence procurement system
Published 16 Jul 2023
Paragraph 102
Defence Committee All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
There is a need for greater continuity in the critical portfolio of Minister for Defence Procurement (MinDP) who is now in day to day charge of an equipment budget totalling almost a quarter of a trillion pounds of UK taxpayer’s money. Politicians need to play their part in reforming our procurement system and therefore we should address the longevity of this appointment. Given the very high importance of the role, the Prime Minister, who is ultimately responsible for Ministerial appointments, should be strongly encouraged to promote greater stability in the procurement system, with MinDP in future serving for at least the bulk of a Parliament.
From: Defence Committee, Ninth Report - It is broke — and it’s time to fix it: The UK’s defence procurement system (HC 1099), paragraph 102, 16 July 2023
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 20 September 2023 (deadline 16 September 2023).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government does not agree that the procurement system is broken, but accepts "the need for reform" and sets out reform work already under way across Defence.
- On the Committee's P75 recommendation, it agrees there is "a strong argument" for higher probability figures for schedule approval of complex programmes, and has issued guidance making P70 "the norm on schedule" for Government Major Projects Portfolio programmes. It says approval at a higher P value "will not improve project performance".
- It agrees on the need for more consistent dialogue with industry and on "an increased emphasis on time", but says it "would therefore not be desirable" to use the Urgent Capability Requirements approach across the whole defence portfolio.
- On accountability, it "recognises the need to clarify internal accountabilities", and says this will be addressed in the Defence Operating Model review. It says "active consideration" is being given to the CEO of DE&S joining the Defence Board.
- On SRO tenure, it notes there is "no formal mechanism" to keep an individual in post for five years, but says it continues to explore how to use available levers such as performance pay and pivotal role allowances.