Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 1

2nd Report - Developing AI capacity and expertise in UK defence Published 10 Jan 2025 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The UK has many of the right conditions that would allow it to be a global leader in the development of Defence AI, but at present Defence is an under-developed aspect of the AI ecosystem in the UK, and the gap between the UK and the current global leaders in AI, the United States and China, is significant. The UK cannot and should not aim to match those countries’ sectors in terms of scale but should instead seek to specialise in areas of strength and achieve a first-class level of sophistication in these. (Conclusion, Paragraph 15)

From: Defence Committee, 2nd Report - Developing AI capacity and expertise in UK defence (HC 590), 10 January 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 4 April 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report and agrees with most recommendations, in several cases in general terms or subject to the outcome of the Strategic Defence Review.

  • On the Strategic Defence Review, it "agrees in general terms" that specific actions should normalise AI use, though the response "cannot pre-empt the findings of the SDR".
  • On the Defence AI Strategy, it believes it is "more pertinent to focus on shaping our future approach" and anticipates the need to refresh its strategic approach, while agreeing that specific, measurable actions will be essential.
  • On a new fund to scale innovations, it says ongoing discussions with HM Treasury "prevent a direct response", and will raise the recommendation with the Treasury "where it is appropriate to do so".
  • On the Digital Strategy for Defence, it "partially agrees" and plans a refreshed digital strategy with an implementation plan and metrics; it says the Digital Backbone has no completion date.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error