Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 9

Second Report - The Integrated Review, Defence in a Competitive Age and the Defence and Security Industrial Strategy Published 28 Jul 2022 Paragraph 54 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The lack of prioritisation means that it is impossible to determine which of the threats highlighted the Government perceives to be greatest. It also results in the military seemingly being the answer for every question whilst not being appropriately resourced for the task.

From: Defence Committee, Second Report - The Integrated Review, Defence in a Competitive Age and the Defence and Security Industrial Strategy (HC 180), paragraph 54, 28 July 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 10 November 2022 (deadline 28 September 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the report and says it "supports the sentiment" of the calls to update its strategy, while confirming an update to the Integrated Review and disputing some of the Committee's criticisms.

  • On the Integrated Review, it says it "believes the IR and Defence Command Paper hold true" but is "not complacent", and that "Defence is supporting the update to the IR".
  • On Army numbers, it says there are "currently no plans to reverse the Army's reduction in regular personnel", while adding that "as the threat changes, we need to change with it".
  • On procurement, it states it does "not accept" that its record on large and complex programmes is "abysmal", citing the P-8A Poseidon and Type 31 frigate programmes. On publishing annual MACA figures, it says the MOD "will consider" a more detailed breakdown.
  • On the Reserves Forces 2030 Review, the Government "will provide a response" following consideration of the UK's commitment to the NATO new force model. No date is given.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error